河街司法:中國基層政法邏輯
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-04-09 23:12
本文選題:司法所 切入點(diǎn):基層司法 出處:《北京理工大學(xué)》2015年博士論文
【摘要】:基于江西豐市河街司法所的實(shí)地調(diào)查,本文較為系統(tǒng)地考察了司法所在實(shí)踐運(yùn)作中所呈現(xiàn)出的種種生動(dòng)面貌:糾紛解決機(jī)制的運(yùn)作及變遷、行政性代理的實(shí)踐樣態(tài)、法制宣傳的真實(shí)面目以及信訪博弈中各方的行動(dòng)和策略。進(jìn)一步,本文將視野從現(xiàn)在放寬到過去、從局部放眼到整體,對(duì)司法所的發(fā)展歷程和窘迫現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了全面而深入的描述和分析,繼而立足于基層政法譜系乃至基層政治生態(tài)的整體,窺探其中存在的問題。透過基層司法的生動(dòng)圖景,本文嘗試挖掘隱藏于基層司法背后的實(shí)踐邏輯,力圖對(duì)現(xiàn)有的基層司法理論有所提升。本文共分八章。第一章作為引子,對(duì)研究緣起、對(duì)象、方法和樣本進(jìn)行交代,并對(duì)既有文獻(xiàn)和理論進(jìn)行梳理。二到五章是對(duì)河街司法所實(shí)踐場(chǎng)景的具體展示。第二章立足于河街司法所,考察了司法所調(diào)解機(jī)制的變遷,認(rèn)為司法所調(diào)解本質(zhì)上是一種行政式調(diào)處。中國基層調(diào)解機(jī)制經(jīng)歷了從自治性調(diào)解、政治性調(diào)解到行政式調(diào)處的變化。在經(jīng)過多年的法制建設(shè)之后,河街司法所的調(diào)處也呈現(xiàn)出新的特點(diǎn)。透過司法所調(diào)解機(jī)制的變遷,本章指出司法所調(diào)解遵循的是一種不同于法庭司法的“政法邏輯”。第三章基于一起深度個(gè)案,考察了行政性代理的發(fā)生機(jī)理及其中各方的行動(dòng)策略,并運(yùn)用博弈論的分析框架對(duì)企業(yè)合作的原因進(jìn)行了探討。最后指出行政性代理在制度化、合法性、合理性和資源供給等方面存在隱憂。第四章從司法所長的工作經(jīng)歷出發(fā),通過講述河街“纏鬧訪”的故事,概括了纏鬧者的行動(dòng)策略,歸納了政府治理信訪的具體類型,進(jìn)而挖掘出引發(fā)“纏鬧訪”的制度原因,揭示基層信訪治理遵循的是一種形式上“依法”治理而實(shí)質(zhì)上“權(quán)宜性”治理的邏輯。第五章集中討論普法與法治的問題。本章將普法放置于社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型的大背景中去理解,回顧了普法運(yùn)動(dòng)的緣起及歷次流變,并回到豐市及河街的普法實(shí)踐,指出普法所面臨的諸多難題,進(jìn)而提出具體改進(jìn)的建議,分析普法運(yùn)動(dòng)的未來走向。文章最后回到普法與法治這一本質(zhì)問題上,指出要突破普法的現(xiàn)有悖論與局限,就需要深入到立法、司法和執(zhí)法層面實(shí)現(xiàn)普法與法治的結(jié)合。六到七章打開視角,力圖從整體上把握司法所這一基層官僚機(jī)構(gòu)。第六章系統(tǒng)梳理了司法所的歷史脈絡(luò),以及它與法律服務(wù)所之間的利益糾葛。在此基礎(chǔ)上,本章對(duì)司法所的體制與運(yùn)作現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了全面的考察,指出國家權(quán)力的延伸和擴(kuò)張與資源供給不足之間的矛盾充斥于司法所的日常運(yùn)作當(dāng)中。第七章則以司法所為中心,對(duì)基層政法譜系進(jìn)行了考察和分析,并試圖透過司法所,觀察中國基層政治生態(tài)的發(fā)展和運(yùn)作問題。結(jié)語部分對(duì)中國基層政法邏輯進(jìn)行了歸納總結(jié),指出基層司法的運(yùn)作過程,是政治權(quán)力和政治意圖與法治因素相互沖突、碰撞、融合進(jìn)而形成平衡的過程。基層司法遵循的這一政法邏輯,在日益強(qiáng)調(diào)法治化的背景下,其政法平衡點(diǎn)逐漸從凸顯實(shí)質(zhì)主義法治的一端走向形式主義法治的另一端。
[Abstract]:Jiangxi city Feng River Street justice based on field survey, this paper systematically investigates the judicial practice of various vivid show appearance in the operation: operation and change of the dispute settlement mechanism, the practice of state administrative agency, the true face of legal publicity and the parties petition in the game of action and strategy. Further. This paper will relax the view from now to the past, from the overall look to the development of local, judicial and distress situation has made a comprehensive and thorough description and analysis of the overall based on the primary law enforcement and genealogy of grassroots political ecology, and the existing problems. Through the vivid picture of grassroots judicial practice, this thesis attempts to explore the the logic hidden in the grassroots judicial behind, trying to improve the existing grassroots judicial theory. This paper is divided into eight chapters. The first chapter is introduction, the object of the study of the origin, and the party Method and samples are explained, and the existing literature and theories. The two chapter to the five chapter is the concrete practice of river scene show street justice. The second chapter based on river street justice, to study the evolution of judicial mediation mechanism, that judicial mediation is essentially a kind of administrative mediation at the grassroots level. From the experience of the mediation mechanism China autonomy mediation, changes of political mediation to administrative mediation. After years of legal construction, judicial mediation River Street also presents new features. Through the change of judicial mediation mechanism, this chapter points out that judicial mediation follows a different from the court the "political logic". The third chapter is based on the case study with depth, occurrence mechanism and action strategies of the parties including administrative agency, reason and analysis using the game theory framework for enterprise cooperation are discussed. At last The administrative agency of legitimacy in the system, the existence of hidden rationality and resource supply and other aspects. The fourth chapter, starting from the judicial experience, by telling the River Street "wrapped around the trouble to visit the story, summarizes the action strategies around downtown, summarizes the government petition with body type, and then dig out lead to" institutional reasons around downtown to visit, to reveal the rural petition governance follows a form of "law" and "governance essentially expedient" governance logic. The fifth chapter focuses on the legal issues and the rule of law. This chapter will be placed in the background of the social transformation to understand and review the origin the movement and legal practice and return to the previous flow, Feng City and River Street, pointed out many problems faced by the law, then put forward the concrete suggestions for improvement, analyzes the trend of legal movement. Finally, back to the general law and rule of law The nature of the problem, the article points out the existing limitations to break the paradox and legal, it needs to further realize the combination of legislation, law and rule of law in the judicial and law enforcement level. The six chapter to the seven open angle of view, tries to grasp the grass-roots judicial bureaucracy as a whole. The sixth chapter systematically combs the history of justice, and between it and the legal services of the conflicting interests. On this basis, this chapter of the judicial system and the operation status of a comprehensive study, points out the contradiction between the lack of state power extension and resource supply to be in the company law of the daily operation. The seventh chapter based on the judicial center on the base of political spectrum is investigated and analyzed, and tried through justice, observe the development of grassroots political ecology Chinese and operation problems. The conclusion part summarizes China grassroots political legal logic, pointed out The operation process of grassroots judicial, political power and political intentions and legal factors of conflict, collision, fusion and the formation of a balanced process. The political logic of judicial follow base, in the increasing emphasis on the background of the rule of law, the other end of the political equilibrium gradually from the end of substantive law to highlight the formalism of the rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:北京理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號(hào)】:D926
,
本文編號(hào):1728579
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/1728579.html
最近更新
教材專著