本文選題：死因調(diào)查制度　切入點：死因裁判制度　出處：《比較法研究》2016年03期

【摘要】：當今世界的死因調(diào)查制度大致可以分為獨立式模式與附屬式模式兩大類。我國的死因調(diào)查制度完全附屬于刑事訴訟,并不存在一套獨立、完整的死因調(diào)查制度體系,且由偵查機關完全主導,導致了程序邏輯上的悖論和結(jié)構(gòu)上的失衡,在部分案件的實踐中造成了司法公信力的弱化。普通法系的死因裁判制度具有獨立性強、程序公正、社會參與度高、司法公信力強的優(yōu)點。我國可借鑒普通法系的死因裁判制度且結(jié)合自身司法體制的特點,確立獨立式的死因調(diào)查模式,建立死因調(diào)查委員會,完善調(diào)查程序,使調(diào)查結(jié)論更具社會公信力。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, the system of death investigation in the world can be divided into two categories: the independent mode and the subsidiary mode.The death investigation system of our country is completely subordinate to the criminal procedure, and there is no independent, complete system of the death investigation system, and it is completely dominated by the investigation organ, which leads to the paradox of procedure logic and the imbalance of structure.The judicial credibility has been weakened in the practice of some cases.The common law system has the advantages of strong independence, fair procedure, high social participation and strong judicial credibility.In our country, we can learn from the common law system and combine the characteristics of our own judicial system, establish the independent mode of death investigation, establish the death investigation committee, perfect the procedure of investigation, and make the conclusion of investigation more credible.
【作者單位】： 上海師范大學法政學院法律系;
【分類號】：D925.2

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 林勁松;;論羈押場所死因調(diào)查制度[J];浙江大學學報(人文社會科學版);2013年02期

，

本文編號：1724224