本文選題：恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪　切入點(diǎn)：獨(dú)立沒(méi)收　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著國(guó)際反恐的高壓態(tài)勢(shì),恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪的隱蔽性逐漸增強(qiáng),犯罪往往通過(guò)數(shù)人或者一人實(shí)施,但卻給公民帶來(lái)極大的恐慌,尤其在近期的歐洲,恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪頻發(fā)。隨著各國(guó)沒(méi)收理論的不斷發(fā)展,針對(duì)涉案財(cái)物的沒(méi)收不再限于因犯罪所得的收益,需要沒(méi)收的對(duì)象已經(jīng)從收益逐漸的延伸到違禁品、犯罪所用財(cái)物以及組成犯罪行為之物等涉案財(cái)物。明確恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪涉案財(cái)物沒(méi)收的性質(zhì),剖析恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪涉案財(cái)物獨(dú)立沒(méi)收的對(duì)象,探討目前法律存在的不足并針對(duì)性的提出相應(yīng)的建議,不僅利于打擊恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪,還能最大限度的保護(hù)犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的合法權(quán)利,從而實(shí)現(xiàn)恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪的打擊和人權(quán)的維護(hù)。文章約三萬(wàn)字,由四部分組成。第一部分是恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪涉案財(cái)物獨(dú)立沒(méi)收的概念和性質(zhì)。合理界定恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪涉案財(cái)物獨(dú)立沒(méi)收的相關(guān)概念是研究的前提,通過(guò)相關(guān)概念的對(duì)比和辨析,明確文章研究的范圍。對(duì)恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪涉案財(cái)物獨(dú)立沒(méi)收的性質(zhì)進(jìn)行分析,總結(jié)以往學(xué)者對(duì)涉案財(cái)物沒(méi)收性質(zhì)的學(xué)術(shù)分析,最后提出自己的觀點(diǎn)。第二部分是對(duì)恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪涉案財(cái)物獨(dú)立沒(méi)收必要性和可行性的探討。刑事訴訟法第280條為沒(méi)收恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪涉案財(cái)物獨(dú)立沒(méi)收提供了法律基礎(chǔ),我國(guó)反恐態(tài)勢(shì)決定了我國(guó)對(duì)恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪涉案財(cái)物沒(méi)收必須嚴(yán)格實(shí)施。從已經(jīng)出臺(tái)的《刑法修正案九》以及《反恐法》可見(jiàn),恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪涉案財(cái)物獨(dú)立沒(méi)收保障體系越來(lái)越完善。第三部分是明確恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪涉案財(cái)物獨(dú)立沒(méi)收的對(duì)象。通過(guò)對(duì)刑法和刑事訴訟法法律規(guī)定的理順,加之對(duì)相關(guān)概念的解釋可以總結(jié)出對(duì)恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪涉案財(cái)物獨(dú)立沒(méi)收對(duì)象主要有三類(lèi):一是恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪中的違禁品;二是恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪中的違法所得;三是實(shí)施恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪的本人財(cái)物。第四部分是在實(shí)體和程序兩個(gè)角度提出完善恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪涉案財(cái)物獨(dú)立沒(méi)收的建議。由于恐怖活動(dòng)犯罪打擊的力度大,涉及的財(cái)物多,案情相對(duì)復(fù)雜,因此在沒(méi)收涉案財(cái)物時(shí),沒(méi)收的理念,證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及利害關(guān)系人的保護(hù)都需要進(jìn)一步完善。
[Abstract]:With the high pressure of international anti-terrorism, the concealment of terrorist activities is gradually enhanced. The crime is often carried out by several people or one person, but it brings great panic to the citizens, especially in recent Europe, the crime of terrorist activities occurs frequently.With the continuous development of confiscation theory in various countries, the confiscation of property involved in the case is no longer limited to the proceeds of crime, and the objects that need to be confiscated have gradually extended from proceeds to contraband.The property used in the crime and the property which constitutes the criminal act, etc.To clarify the nature of the confiscation of property involved in terrorist crimes, to analyze the objects of independent confiscation of property involved in terrorist crimes, to explore the shortcomings of current laws and to put forward corresponding suggestions, is not only conducive to cracking down on crimes of terrorist activities,It can also protect the legal rights of criminal suspects and defendants to the maximum extent, thus realizing the fight against terrorist activities and the protection of human rights.The article is about 30,000 words and consists of four parts.The first part is the concept and nature of the independent confiscation of property involved in terrorist crimes.It is the premise of the study to reasonably define the related concepts of the independent confiscation of property involved in the terrorist crime. Through the contrast and differentiation of the relevant concepts, the scope of the article is clarified.This paper analyzes the nature of the independent confiscation of property involved in terrorist crime, summarizes the academic analysis of the nature of property confiscation involved in the case by scholars in the past, and finally puts forward his own views.The second part discusses the necessity and feasibility of independent confiscation of property involved in terrorist activities.Article 280 of the Criminal procedure Law provides a legal basis for the confiscation of property involved in terrorist activities, and the situation of anti-terrorism in our country determines that the confiscation of property involved in terrorist crimes must be strictly carried out in our country.From the "Criminal Law Amendment 9" and the Anti-Terrorism Law, we can see that the system of independently confiscating the property involved in terrorist activities is becoming more and more perfect.The third part is to clarify the object of independent confiscation of property involved in terrorist activities.Through the straightening out of the criminal law and the criminal procedure law, together with the explanation of the related concepts, it can be concluded that there are three main objects of independent confiscation of the property involved in the crime of terrorist activity: first, the contraband in the crime of terrorist activity;The second is the illegal proceeds of the terrorist crime, and the third is the personal property of the terrorist crime.In the fourth part, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the confiscation of the property involved in terrorist crime from the two angles of entity and procedure.Because the crime of terrorist activities has a strong strike, involving a lot of property, the case is relatively complex, so when confiscating the property involved, the concept of confiscation, the standard of proof and the protection of interested parties all need to be further improved.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 康均心;官爾杰;劉猛;;海峽兩岸反恐法律比較研究[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年05期

2 陳衛(wèi)東;李響;;論違法所得沒(méi)收特別程序中的利害關(guān)系人[J];政法論壇;2015年01期

3 鄧立軍;;違法所得特別沒(méi)收程序的潛在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與控制[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2015年01期

4 張小玲;;我國(guó)恐怖活動(dòng)案件違法所得沒(méi)收程序探討[J];江淮論壇;2014年06期

5 邵劭;;特別沒(méi)收程序的理論和適用問(wèn)題探析[J];法商研究;2014年04期

6 黃風(fēng);;論“沒(méi)收個(gè)人全部財(cái)產(chǎn)”刑罰的廢止——以追繳犯罪資產(chǎn)的國(guó)際合作為視角[J];法商研究;2014年01期

7 熊秋紅;;從特別沒(méi)收程序的性質(zhì)看制度完善[J];法學(xué);2013年09期

8 初殿清;;違法所得沒(méi)收特別程序的性質(zhì)與案件范圍[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年08期

9 孫煜華;;涉案財(cái)產(chǎn)沒(méi)收程序如何才能經(jīng)受憲法拷問(wèn)[J];法學(xué);2012年06期

10 張明楷;;論刑法中的沒(méi)收[J];法學(xué)家;2012年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 楊婷婷;我國(guó)刑法中特別沒(méi)收的對(duì)象研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年

2 董文;日本刑法中的沒(méi)收制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2014年

3 劉溉;我國(guó)刑事沒(méi)收制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2013年

4 張婕;我國(guó)未經(jīng)定罪財(cái)產(chǎn)沒(méi)收制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1703291