本文選題：刑事附帶民事訴訟　切入點：調(diào)解制度　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國刑事附帶民事訴訟制度在實踐運用中正面臨著立法與實踐脫節(jié)的困境，本應(yīng)作為節(jié)約訴訟成本、減少訴累的制度，反而引起了纏訟等問題，不僅降低了訴訟效率，甚至加深了當(dāng)事人之間的矛盾。面對這一困境，理論界展開了關(guān)于該制度存廢問題的探討，而實務(wù)界則是自生自發(fā)地進行了改革附帶民事訴訟制度的探索，運用調(diào)解制度解決附帶民事糾紛。 從實踐的效果來看，通過調(diào)節(jié)結(jié)案是目前彌補附帶民事訴訟制度缺陷的最佳方案，并對緩解當(dāng)事人之間的矛盾有著重要的意義：一方面，運用調(diào)解的方式解決附帶民事糾紛并達成調(diào)解協(xié)議，被害人能夠及時獲得損害賠償，解決了判決執(zhí)行難的問題；被告人也可以通過積極履行賠償義務(wù)，在一定情況下能夠獲取較輕的刑罰，既維護了雙方當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益，也能有效化解矛盾，實現(xiàn)“雙贏”；另一方面，糾紛得到順利解決，能夠有助于訴訟效率的提高、減少訴累，節(jié)約司法成本，建立一個系統(tǒng)的調(diào)解機制勢在必行。 本文從附帶民事訴訟存在的問題著手，通過分析現(xiàn)有制度的不足與刑事附帶民事訴訟調(diào)解的理論依據(jù)，并對比調(diào)解與判決、和解的差別，介紹了建立調(diào)解制度的必要性和可行性；針對如何正確處理好損害賠償與量刑的關(guān)系以及結(jié)合附帶民事訴訟調(diào)解制度的特殊性，探討了調(diào)解制度適用的前提和應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循的原則；最后則是從調(diào)解程序的啟動方式、適用范圍、適用階段、經(jīng)調(diào)解可能產(chǎn)生的結(jié)果以及相關(guān)配套措施的完善五個方面，，對調(diào)解的具體適用問題展開了進一步的探討。
[Abstract]:China's criminal incidental civil litigation system is facing the dilemma of disconnection between legislation and practice in its practical application. It should be regarded as a system of saving litigation costs and reducing litigation tired.On the contrary, it has caused problems such as litigation, which not only reduces the efficiency of litigation, but also reduces the efficiency of litigation. It even deepens the contradiction between the parties. In the face of this dilemma, the theoretical circle has launched a discussion on the issue of the retention and abolition of the system, while the practical circles have spontaneously carried out the exploration of reforming the system of incidental civil action. The use of mediation system to resolve incidental civil disputes. From the point of view of practice effect, it is the best scheme to remedy the defects of incidental civil action system by adjusting the settlement of the case, and it has important significance to alleviate the contradiction between the parties: on the one hand, By means of mediation to resolve incidental civil disputes and reach an agreement on mediation, the victim can receive compensation for damages in time, and the problem of difficult execution of the judgment can be resolved; the defendant may also actively perform the obligation of compensation, Under certain circumstances, the lighter penalty can be obtained, which not only preserves the legitimate rights and interests of both parties, but also effectively resolves contradictions and realizes "win-win situation". On the other hand, the smooth resolution of disputes can help to improve the efficiency of litigation. It is imperative to reduce litigation tiredness, save judicial cost and establish a systematic mediation mechanism. This article begins with the problems existing in incidental civil action, through the analysis of the deficiency of the existing system and the theoretical basis of the mediation of criminal incidental civil action, and compares the difference between mediation and judgment, reconciliation, etc. This paper introduces the necessity and feasibility of establishing mediation system, discusses the application premise and principles of mediation system in view of how to correctly handle the relationship between compensation for damages and sentencing and the particularity of mediation system in incidental civil proceedings. Finally, from five aspects of the starting mode, the scope of application, the applicable stage, the possible results of mediation and the improvement of relevant supporting measures, the paper further discusses the specific application of mediation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 崔永東;;從“恢復(fù)性司法”看中國法文化傳統(tǒng)的現(xiàn)代意義[J];北方法學(xué);2009年06期

2 陸詩忠;;恢復(fù)性司法“中國化”之制度抗衡問題研究[J];北方法學(xué);2011年06期

3 肖乾利;國建;代松;;刑事附帶民事訴訟面臨困境和對策的思考——基于宜賓市刑事附帶民事訴訟案件的實證調(diào)查[J];西華大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期

4 ;關(guān)于刑事附帶民事訴訟面臨的司法困境及其解決對策的調(diào)研報告[J];法律適用;2007年07期

5 陳斯;李紅輝;;刑事附帶民事訴訟調(diào)解:協(xié)商與損害回復(fù)——一種值得重視的刑事沖突化解方式[J];法律適用;2010年09期

6 曲新久;論刑事附帶民事訴訟中公權(quán)與私權(quán)的協(xié)調(diào)[J];法學(xué);2003年08期

7 王文軍;黃洵;;刑事附帶民事訴訟的現(xiàn)狀與反思——基于對刑事附帶民事程序的實證調(diào)查[J];法學(xué);2008年03期

8 汪翔;;論刑事附帶民事訴訟調(diào)解制度的完善[J];法制與社會;2010年20期

9 溫剛;溫國鵬;;刑事附帶民事訴訟調(diào)解中利益失衡問題的審視與展望[J];法律適用;2012年08期

10 江笑;;刑事附帶民事訴訟調(diào)解輕刑化的正當(dāng)性與適用[J];法制與社會;2013年26期

本文編號：1674867