本文選題：現(xiàn)行犯　切入點：訴訟程序　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著迅速出警機(jī)制的建立和社區(qū)管理的不斷完善，我國破獲的現(xiàn)行犯案件數(shù)量日益增加，現(xiàn)行犯案件在案件總量中的比例持續(xù)攀升。我國針對現(xiàn)行犯案件并未規(guī)定特別的處理程序，針對現(xiàn)行犯案件仍然使用普通程序處理。實踐中被羈押的犯罪嫌疑人即使是證據(jù)充分、案件輕微的現(xiàn)行犯，對其長期羈押的現(xiàn)象仍然十分常見。這不僅不利于對犯罪嫌疑人的人權(quán)保護(hù)，也不利于案件得到及時有效的處理。在這種大背景下，，對于現(xiàn)行犯案件適用特別處理程序尤為必要。 我國現(xiàn)行的刑事訴訟法規(guī)定了對于現(xiàn)行犯可以適用先行拘留的幾種情形，但是法律并未明確規(guī)定現(xiàn)行犯的概念，這導(dǎo)致實踐中對于現(xiàn)行犯案件確立標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和適用范圍的混亂�？v觀世界各國法律，許多國家的法律都明確界定了現(xiàn)行犯的內(nèi)涵，并針對現(xiàn)行犯案件適用迅速審判的處理程序。由于現(xiàn)行犯案件有著不同于普通刑事案件的特點，這類案件一般犯罪事實清楚、證據(jù)較為充分，因此再對現(xiàn)行犯案件適用普通程序處理明顯不符合訴訟效率的價值目標(biāo)，也不利于對犯罪嫌疑人的人權(quán)保護(hù)。鑒于此，我國有必要借鑒國外對于現(xiàn)行犯立法的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗，確立我國現(xiàn)行犯案件的特別處理程序。 在構(gòu)建現(xiàn)行犯案件速決程序的過程中，應(yīng)注意我國特有的違法行為追訴機(jī)制的影響，以及速決程序是否有違無罪推定原則。本文首先介紹了我國現(xiàn)行法律對于現(xiàn)行犯的規(guī)定及存在的問題，隨后借鑒國外對于現(xiàn)行犯的立法經(jīng)驗，確立了自己對于現(xiàn)行犯概念的界定。其次對現(xiàn)行犯訴訟程序的歷史發(fā)展進(jìn)行了梳理，并對幾個國家的現(xiàn)行犯處理程序進(jìn)行了比較研究。再次針對我國現(xiàn)行犯案件的處理現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了評價和總結(jié)。最后提出了如何構(gòu)建我國現(xiàn)行犯案件的處理程序，以及構(gòu)建過程中應(yīng)注意的問題。
[Abstract]:With the rapid establishment of police mechanism and the continuous improvement of community management, the number of current criminal cases cracked in our country is increasing day by day. The proportion of current criminal cases in the total number of cases continues to rise. China has not stipulated special procedures for handling cases of current crimes. For cases of current crimes, ordinary procedures are still used to deal with them. In practice, criminal suspects who are detained even if the evidence is sufficient and the case is minor, The phenomenon of their prolonged detention is still very common. This is not only detrimental to the protection of the human rights of criminal suspects, but also to the timely and effective handling of cases. It is necessary to apply special procedure to the current crime cases. The current criminal procedure law of our country provides for several cases in which advance detention can be applied to the current crime, but the law does not clearly specify the concept of the current crime. This has led to confusion in the practice of establishing standards and the scope of application for existing crimes. Throughout the world's laws, the laws of many countries clearly define the connotation of the current crime. Due to the fact that the current crime cases are different from ordinary criminal cases, the general criminal facts of such cases are clear, and the evidence is relatively sufficient. Therefore, it is obviously not in line with the value goal of litigation efficiency to apply the ordinary procedure to the current crime cases, nor is it conducive to the protection of the human rights of the criminal suspects. In view of this, it is necessary for our country to learn from the advanced experience of foreign countries in the legislation of the current crime. To establish the special procedure of handling the current crime cases in our country. In the process of constructing the procedure of prompt decision of the current crime case, we should pay attention to the influence of the prosecution mechanism of the special illegal act in our country. And whether the procedure of prompt decision is contrary to the principle of presumption of innocence. Firstly, this paper introduces the provisions and existing problems of the current crime in our country, and then draws lessons from the legislative experience of foreign countries on the current crime. It establishes its own definition of the concept of current crime. Secondly, it combs the historical development of the current criminal procedure. Finally, the author makes a comparative study of the current crime handling procedures in several countries, and then evaluates and summarizes the present situation of handling the current crime cases in our country. Finally, it puts forward how to construct the handling procedures of the current crime cases in our country. And the problems that should be paid attention to in the process of construction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 施鵬鵬;;控權(quán)模式下的真相發(fā)現(xiàn):法國拘留制度述評[J];比較法研究;2010年06期

2 鄭齊猛;;論我國刑事訴訟法立法語言的完善[J];法律適用;2011年06期

3 焦盛榮;;提高我國刑事訴訟效率的思考[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年02期

4 謝小劍;;現(xiàn)行犯訴訟程序論[J];河北法學(xué);2009年07期

5 方成軍;;多元化快速審理程序的構(gòu)建 以意大利刑事特別程序的借鑒為視角[J];人民檢察;2008年18期

6 馬靜華;潘利平;;迅速審判:不同刑事訴訟模式下的理念與制度比較[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期

7 謝小劍;公訴審查略式程序研究——省略我國審查起訴程序的思考[J];法學(xué)論壇;2005年02期

8 周長軍;;現(xiàn)行犯案件的初查措施:反思性研究——以新《刑事訴訟法》第117條對傳喚、拘傳的修改為切入[J];法學(xué)論壇;2012年03期

9 黃朝俊;;論刑事訴訟中的迅速審判程序[J];宜賓學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年02期

10 耿連海;關(guān)于對現(xiàn)行犯適用先行拘留的思考[J];政法學(xué)刊;2004年06期

本文編號：1668054