發(fā)布時間：2018-03-24 05:24

  本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代　切入點：法官　出處：《安徽大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代是一個高度自由開放的多元時代,網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒介高度發(fā)達,媒介信息繁紛復(fù)雜、良莠不齊,對社會大眾的日常生活和工作學(xué)習(xí)影響越來越大。法官作為社會大眾的一份子,同樣生活和工作在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境之中,接觸和使用網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒介及其信息早已是其生活和工作的一部分,潛移默化之中也會受到網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒介及其信息的影響。我國法治建設(shè)不斷推進,公民的法治觀念、法律權(quán)利意識及其維權(quán)能力不斷提高,越來越關(guān)注法律案件的審判。監(jiān)督報道司法審判一直是網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒介的重要工作內(nèi)容。網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒介追逐新聞價值、商業(yè)利益和社會轟動效應(yīng)的這些先天特性,決定了法官這一群體是網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒體關(guān)注的焦點,特別是在今天強調(diào)發(fā)揮媒介輿論監(jiān)督司法的法治社會。這就導(dǎo)致網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒介輿論對法官的工作影響會越來越大,且以負面影響居多,如輿論審判。但當前我國法官整體媒介素養(yǎng)普遍偏低,不具備熟練應(yīng)用網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒介信息的技能,缺乏有效處理網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒介對其審判工作的干擾,不能有效應(yīng)對處理"網(wǎng)絡(luò)審判"。同時,法官也沒有樹立網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代的新聞觀和"新聞話語權(quán)"意識,缺乏尊重網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒介輿論監(jiān)督權(quán)和給予網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒介輿論監(jiān)督以寬容。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代下要求法官具備網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒介素養(yǎng),是緩解法官與網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳媒對抗的現(xiàn)實要求、是順應(yīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)展趨勢的時代要求、是法官職業(yè)完善發(fā)展的自身要求,也是網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒體監(jiān)督越位的倒逼和審判公開趨勢的推動。提高法官媒介素養(yǎng)已成為當下解決司法與媒體沖突關(guān)系的重要手段,也是提高法官綜合素養(yǎng)和審判工作能力的迫切要求。但目前我國的法官媒介素養(yǎng)教育還主要理論研究階段,尚未形成完善的法官媒介素養(yǎng)教育體系,法官的媒介素養(yǎng)亟需提高。造成上述現(xiàn)象的原因主要有法官媒介素養(yǎng)教育理論不足、法官學(xué)習(xí)媒介素養(yǎng)意識薄弱以及法官媒介素養(yǎng)教育投入不足等。要在短時間內(nèi)整體提高法官的媒介素養(yǎng),教育則是最為有效的提升途徑。法官媒介素養(yǎng)教育作為一項系統(tǒng)工程,需要明確其教育目標定位,明確其教育內(nèi)容和能力要求。對法官進行媒介素養(yǎng)教育,除了要掌握媒介素養(yǎng)教育的一般內(nèi)容外,還應(yīng)掌握司法與媒體的關(guān)系、法官審理案件與媒體報道案件的區(qū)別和聯(lián)系、如何處理"媒體審判"、"網(wǎng)絡(luò)審判"等專業(yè)內(nèi)容;同時還應(yīng)具備以下能力:輿論搜集與評估能力、輿論引導(dǎo)能力、處理媒體庭審報道的能力。進行法官媒介素養(yǎng)教育,需要進行頂層設(shè)計,將法官媒介素養(yǎng)教育寫入《人民法院第五個五年改革綱要》,為進行法官媒介素養(yǎng)教育提供政策保障;需要加大法官媒介素養(yǎng)教育投入,為法官媒介素養(yǎng)教育提供經(jīng)費保障;通過完善法官學(xué)院法官媒介素養(yǎng)教育,為進行法官媒介素養(yǎng)教育提供師資培訓(xùn)、教學(xué)教材以及教學(xué)場地保障等;同時還要重視法學(xué)院校的媒介素養(yǎng)教育,做到法官媒介素養(yǎng)教育從法學(xué)學(xué)生抓起。
[Abstract]:The network age is a highly free and open multivariate era. The network media is highly developed, the media information is complex, the good and bad are intermingled, and the influence on the daily life and work and study of the public is increasing. Judge is a member of the public. Also living and working in the network environment, contact and use of network media and their information has long been a part of their lives and work, and will also be influenced by network media and their information. Citizens' concept of rule of law, awareness of legal rights and their ability to protect their rights have been improving, and more and more attention has been paid to the trial of legal cases. The supervision and reporting of judicial trials has always been an important part of the work of the network media, which pursues the value of news. These innate characteristics of commercial interests and social sensations determine that the judges are the focus of attention in the network media. Especially today, the emphasis is placed on the rule of law society in which the media and public opinion supervise the administration of justice. This has led to the increasing influence of Internet media public opinion on the work of judges, and the majority of the negative effects. For example, public opinion trial. But at present, the overall media literacy of judges in our country is generally low, they do not have the skills of skilled application of network media information, and they lack the ability to deal effectively with the interference of network media to their trial work. At the same time, the judges have not set up the news view and the consciousness of "news discourse right" in the network era. The lack of respect for the right of public opinion supervision of the network media and the tolerance of the supervision of the public opinion of the network media. In the network age, it is a realistic requirement to ease the confrontation between the judges and the network media by requiring judges to possess the qualities of the network media. It is the requirement of the times to conform to the development trend of the network, and the self-requirement of the professional perfection of the judges. It is also the push of offside supervision of network media and the promotion of trial publicity. Improving the media literacy of judges has become an important means to resolve the relationship between judicature and media conflict. It is also an urgent requirement to improve the judges' comprehensive literacy and the ability of judicial work. But at present, the judges' media literacy education in our country is still the main theoretical research stage, and has not yet formed a perfect system of judges' media literacy education. The media literacy of judges needs to be improved urgently. The reasons for the above phenomenon are mainly lack of the theory of judges' media literacy education. In order to improve the media literacy of judges in a short period of time, education is the most effective way to promote it. As a systematic project, the education of judges' media literacy is a systematic project. It is necessary to define its educational objective, its educational content and its ability requirements. In addition to mastering the general content of media literacy education, judges should also master the relationship between the judiciary and the media. How to deal with the professional contents such as "media trial" and "network trial" and how to deal with the professional contents such as "media trial" and "network trial"; at the same time, they should also have the following abilities: the ability of collecting and evaluating public opinion, the ability of guiding public opinion, The ability to deal with the media reports in court. To carry out the media literacy education of judges, it is necessary to carry out the top-level design and write the education of the judges' media literacy into the fifth five-year reform outline of the people's Court, so as to provide policy guarantee for the education of the judges' media literacy. It is necessary to increase the investment in the media literacy education of judges, to provide financial guarantee for the media literacy education of judges, and to provide teacher training for the media literacy education of judges through perfecting the media literacy education of judges in the judges' colleges. At the same time, we should pay attention to the media literacy education in law colleges and universities, so that the judges' media literacy education should be started from the law students.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 蔡斐;許建兵;;法官媒介素養(yǎng)論——從保障審判獨立的角度切入[J];臨沂大學(xué)學(xué)報;2011年05期

2 郭衛(wèi)華;劉園園;;論媒體與法院的良性互動[J];法學(xué)評論;2008年01期

3 高一飛;;庭審直播問題的法與理[J];法學(xué);2006年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李媛;法官與媒體的關(guān)系研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1656903