發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-23 23:07

  本文選題：抽象規(guī)范審查　切入點(diǎn)：客觀釋明利益　出處：《環(huán)球法律評(píng)論》2017年05期

【摘要】：德國(guó)違憲審查制度是最具代表性的憲法保障制度之一。抽象規(guī)范審查是為彌補(bǔ)美式具體司法審查的不足而發(fā)展起來(lái)的一種客觀規(guī)范審查程序。抽象規(guī)范審查是在由于聯(lián)邦制而形成的規(guī)范審查、法官的規(guī)范審查權(quán)以及規(guī)范審查權(quán)集中于憲法法院等基礎(chǔ)上發(fā)展起來(lái)的�；痉▽�(duì)抽象規(guī)范審查程序作了規(guī)定,聯(lián)邦憲法法院則對(duì)之作了具體化。經(jīng)由對(duì)基本法和聯(lián)邦憲法法院法有關(guān)抽象審查的受理要件、審查依據(jù)、判決形式和效力、特別程序的規(guī)定以及相關(guān)學(xué)說(shuō)與判例的介紹和分析,可以發(fā)現(xiàn),即便在德國(guó),抽象規(guī)范審查作為憲法保障制度所發(fā)揮的功能也非常有限,在缺乏具體案件的情況下,憲法法院不僅可能對(duì)法律難以有充分的認(rèn)識(shí),而且容易淪為咨詢機(jī)關(guān)及政黨斗爭(zhēng)的工具,損害司法權(quán)威。
[Abstract]:Germany's unconstitutional review system is one of the most representative constitutional guarantee systems. Abstract normative review is an objective normative review procedure developed to make up for the deficiencies of the specific judicial review in the United States. Normative review resulting from federalism, The judges' normative review powers and their normative review powers have been developed on the basis of the Constitutional Court. The basic Law provides for an abstract normative review procedure. The Federal Constitutional Court, for its part, has concretized it. Through the introduction and analysis of the basic Law and the Federal Constitutional Court Law on the admissibility of the abstract review, the basis of the review, the form and effect of the judgment, the provisions of the special procedures and the relevant doctrines and jurisprudence, It can be found that, even in Germany, the function of the review of abstract norms as a system of constitutional guarantees is very limited. In the absence of specific cases, the Constitutional Court may not only be unable to fully understand the law, And easy to become advisory bodies and political parties fighting tools, damage to judicial authority.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院法學(xué)院;
【基金】：作者參與的北京市社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重大項(xiàng)目“我國(guó)憲法實(shí)施制度的改進(jìn)與完善”的研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：D951.6;DD916.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 袁勇;;行政規(guī)范審查初論[J];公法研究;2012年01期

2 張桂龍;劉作翔;孔祥俊;張志銘;王潔;甘文;青鋒;謝暉;;法律律規(guī)范審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)筆談[J];行政管理改革;2012年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1655601