本文選題：缺席　切入點：言詞辯論　出處：《法商研究》2017年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：在民事訴訟中,出席庭審參加言詞辯論乃當(dāng)事人在訴訟法上的負擔(dān)而非訴訟義務(wù),缺席的本質(zhì)乃當(dāng)事人對該訴訟法上負擔(dān)的不履行�！吨腥A人民共和國民事訴訟法》關(guān)于當(dāng)事人缺席之規(guī)制并不科學(xué),主要表現(xiàn)為對雙方當(dāng)事人同時缺席處理的缺失以及不正當(dāng)?shù)貐^(qū)分原、被告缺席而作不同之處理。這種制度安排不僅有違平等原則,也不符合民事訴訟的基本原理�！睹袷略V訟法解釋》第174條第2款關(guān)于拘傳原告的規(guī)定更是嚴重違反了法律保留原則。完善我國民事訴訟當(dāng)事人缺席之規(guī)制制度不僅應(yīng)當(dāng)立足于缺席的性質(zhì),更應(yīng)遵循民事訴訟運行的內(nèi)在規(guī)律。
[Abstract]:In civil proceedings, it is the party's burden in the procedural law rather than the duty of litigation to attend the hearing and participate in the speech debate. The essence of absence is the failure of the parties to fulfill the burden of the procedural law. The rules governing the absence of the parties in the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China are not scientific. This kind of institutional arrangement is not only against the principle of equality, but also shows the absence of both parties and the improper division of the original and the absence of the defendant. It also does not accord with the basic principle of civil action. Article 174, paragraph 2, of the interpretation of the Civil procedure Law on the arrest of the plaintiff is a serious violation of the principle of legal reservation. Should be based only on the nature of absence, More should follow the internal law of the operation of civil proceedings.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金項目(17BFX053) 國家2011計劃司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心項目
【分類號】：D925.1

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 占善剛;;言詞辯論的全部意旨研究——德國、日本的判例、學(xué)說之考察及其啟示[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2012年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 周優(yōu)菊;民事訴訟中電子截屏證據(jù)的審查判斷研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2017年

2 宋娟;民事訴訟送達難及其對策研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號：1646388