本文選題：文化遺產保護　切入點：公益訴訟　出處：《西北大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：近年來人為破壞文化遺產的現(xiàn)象愈演愈烈,人們的法治意識不斷提高,維護社會公益觀念被大眾廣泛認可,充分調動了公眾參與文化遺產保護的積極性。但是,當前我國文化遺產保護的公眾參與機制不健全,公眾參與文化遺產保護沒有合法的地位和途徑,阻力重重。面對不斷受到侵害、逐漸消失在城市化進程中的文化遺產,公眾要求參與文化遺產保護的呼聲越來越高,構建文化遺產保護公益訴訟制度被提上日程。 面對如此局面,本文意在分析如何構建適合我國國情的文化遺產保護公益訴訟制度。這是一個復雜的社會法律問題,本文擬從社會學、文化遺產學、法學等角度解決該問題。以定海古城訴訟案和北京前門222號院訴訟案這兩個典型案例為切入點,從保護文化遺產的必要性、需要公益訴訟保護渠道和現(xiàn)有保護制度不足這三個角度分析論題的必要性和可行性,結合美、英、法、日等國的相關制度經驗提出符合我國國情的立法建議,從立法確認文化遺產公益訴訟制度、原告資格、訴訟程序設置、激勵措施等角度構建文化遺產保護公益訴訟制度,并構建了相關法律保護理念、配套法律法規(guī)、文化遺產保護管理的配套制度,探索出法律上構建社會公眾共同參與的文化遺產保護制度化之路。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the phenomenon of man-made destruction of cultural heritage has intensified, people's awareness of the rule of law has been constantly raised, and the concept of safeguarding the public good has been widely recognized by the public, and the enthusiasm of the public to participate in the protection of cultural heritage has been fully mobilized. However, At present, the mechanism of public participation in the protection of cultural heritage in our country is not perfect, the public participation in the protection of cultural heritage has no legal status and means, and there are many obstacles. In the face of the continuous encroachment, the cultural heritage gradually disappears in the process of urbanization. The public demand to participate in the protection of cultural heritage is increasing, and the construction of public interest litigation system for the protection of cultural heritage has been put on the agenda. In the face of this situation, this paper intends to analyze how to construct the public interest litigation system of cultural heritage protection suitable for the national conditions of our country. This is a complicated social and legal problem. From the angle of law and other aspects, to solve this problem. From the two typical cases, the case of the ancient city of Dinghai and the lawsuit case of Qianmen 222 in Beijing, as a starting point, from the point of view of the necessity of protecting cultural heritage, It is necessary to analyze the necessity and feasibility of the topic from the three angles of public interest litigation protection channel and insufficient existing protection system. Combined with the relevant system experiences of the United States, Britain, France, Japan and other countries, the author puts forward legislative proposals that are in line with the national conditions of our country. From the angle of legislation confirming the public interest litigation system of cultural heritage, the qualification of plaintiff, the setting of litigation procedure, the incentive measures and so on, this paper constructs the system of public interest litigation for cultural heritage protection, and constructs the related legal protection idea, supporting laws and regulations, etc. The supporting system of cultural heritage protection and management explores the way to institutionalize the legal construction of cultural heritage protection in which the public can participate in it.
【學位授予單位】：西北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王林;中外歷史文化遺產保護制度比較[J];城市規(guī)劃;2000年08期

2 莫紀宏,張毓華;訴權是現(xiàn)代法治社會第一制度性權利[J];法學雜志;2002年04期

3 張順杰;;國外文化遺產保護公眾參與及對中國的啟示[J];法制與社會;2009年32期

4 顏運秋;周曉明;;公益訴訟制度比較研究——兼論我國公益訴訟制度的建立[J];法治研究;2011年11期

5 崔華平;;美國環(huán)境公益訴訟制度研究[J];環(huán)境保護;2008年24期

6 吳漢東;;文化多樣性的主權、人權與私權分析[J];法學研究;2007年06期

7 賀云翱;;文化遺產學初論[J];南京大學學報(哲學.人文科學.社會科學版);2007年03期

8 陶信平;;日本歷史文化遺產法律保護對我國的借鑒[J];西北農林科技大學學報(社會科學版);2009年04期

9 陳娥;;非物質文化遺產的公益訴訟保護[J];理論觀察;2013年03期

10 劉先輝;;我國文化遺產保護法律體系:構建與發(fā)展[J];時代法學;2013年04期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 劉敏;天津建筑遺產保護公眾參與機制與實踐研究[D];天津大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1582631