本文選題：國際民商事平行訴訟　切入點(diǎn)：不方便法院原則　出處：《福州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的背景下,由于各國管轄權(quán)制度的差異性和擴(kuò)張性,導(dǎo)致各國對涉外民商事案件的管轄權(quán)容易發(fā)生積極沖突。在多個國家均具有管轄權(quán)的情況下,當(dāng)事人往往出于自身利益的考慮進(jìn)行法院挑選,挑選的結(jié)果容易出現(xiàn)當(dāng)事人同時或先后就同一爭議向不同國家的法院提起訴訟的情況,使得國際民商事平行訴訟的產(chǎn)生成為一種必然。國際民商事平行訴訟固然可以為各國當(dāng)事人提供訴訟上的便利,使得當(dāng)事人能夠獲得必要、正當(dāng)?shù)乃痉ň葷?jì),比如保障債權(quán)的全面清償,防止訴訟時效期間屆滿,保護(hù)被告的訴訟權(quán)利,限制法院的不當(dāng)管轄等；但在當(dāng)事人存在濫訴、惡意拖延訴訟的情況下,平行訴訟則演變?yōu)橐环N亟待解決的現(xiàn)存問題,它往往造成當(dāng)事人負(fù)擔(dān)的增加、司法資源的浪費(fèi)、判決的矛盾與沖突,也使得國家間判決的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行困難重重。正源于此,國際上有關(guān)規(guī)制和協(xié)調(diào)國際民商事平行訴訟問題的法律機(jī)制應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。從我國有關(guān)平行訴訟的立法和司法實(shí)踐來看,我國在國際民商事平行訴訟問題上解決得并不理想,存在很多有待完善的地方,有必要結(jié)合我國國情參考和借鑒國外協(xié)調(diào)平行訴訟的豐富經(jīng)驗(yàn)和方法,從而完善我國國際民商事平行訴訟的協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制。本文主要采用比較分析方法、理論和實(shí)踐相結(jié)合的研究方法探討我國國際民商事平行訴訟問題,整篇文章共分為4章。第一章是關(guān)于國際民商事平行訴訟概述。這章從平行訴訟的概念出發(fā),具體分析了平行訴訟問題的多元成因和正負(fù)價值,從而論證平行訴訟問題規(guī)制的正當(dāng)性。第二章是關(guān)于我國國際民商事平行訴訟之現(xiàn)狀分析。本部分致力于分析我國有關(guān)平行訴訟的立法和司法現(xiàn)狀,從中發(fā)現(xiàn)問題并嘗試挖掘出問題的根源所在。第三章是關(guān)于國外對國際民商事平行訴訟的既有協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制的評析。這部分內(nèi)容主要以美國和歐盟為例對國際平行訴訟的既有協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制進(jìn)行歸納,具體評析了這些協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制和方法的優(yōu)劣性從而探索這些機(jī)制或方法在我國是否有生長的土壤。第四章是在上述部分的基礎(chǔ)上完善我國國際民商事平行訴訟的協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制。一方面,應(yīng)當(dāng)順應(yīng)時代變化轉(zhuǎn)變我國看待國際民商事平行訴訟問題的固有視角和思維。另一方面,在具體措施上研究協(xié)調(diào)我國國際民商事平行訴訟問題的可能路徑,從而完善我國國際民商事平行訴訟的協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制,在司法實(shí)踐中公正、合理地解決跨國民事爭議,促進(jìn)跨國民事交往的順利進(jìn)行。
[Abstract]:Under the background of economic globalization, because of the difference and expansibility of the jurisdiction system of various countries, the jurisdiction of various countries over foreign civil and commercial cases is prone to active conflict. The parties tend to select the court out of self-interest, and the results of the selection are likely to result in the parties taking proceedings in the courts of different countries at the same time or successively in relation to the same dispute, The parallel litigation of international civil and commercial affairs becomes a kind of necessity. The parallel litigation of international civil and commercial affairs can, of course, provide the parties in various countries with the convenience of litigation, and enable the parties to obtain necessary and proper judicial relief. For example, to ensure the full settlement of claims, to prevent the expiration of the limitation period of action, to protect the litigation rights of the defendant, and to limit the improper jurisdiction of the court, etc., but in the case of excessive litigation by the parties and malicious delay in litigation, Parallel litigation has evolved into an existing problem that needs to be solved urgently. It often results in the increase of the burden of the parties, the waste of judicial resources, the contradiction and conflict of the judgment, and the difficulties in the recognition and enforcement of the judgment between countries. The international legal mechanism of regulating and coordinating parallel litigation in international civil and commercial affairs has emerged as the times require. From the legislative and judicial practice of parallel litigation in our country, the problem of parallel litigation in international civil and commercial matters has not been solved satisfactorily in our country. There are many places to be perfected. It is necessary to refer to and learn from the rich experience and methods of coordinating parallel litigation in foreign countries, so as to perfect the coordination mechanism of parallel litigation in international civil and commercial affairs. This article is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is an overview of international civil and commercial parallel litigation. This chapter starts from the concept of parallel litigation. This paper analyzes the multiple causes and positive and negative value of parallel litigation. The second chapter is about the analysis of the current situation of China's international civil and commercial parallel litigation. This part is devoted to the analysis of the legislation and judicial status of parallel litigation in China. The third chapter is about the analysis of the existing coordination mechanism of foreign parallel litigation against international civil and commercial affairs. This part mainly takes the United States and the European Union as an example to the international parallel litigation. The existing coordination mechanism of litigation is summarized. This paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of these coordination mechanisms and methods and explores whether they have the soil to grow in our country. Chapter 4th is to perfect the coordination mechanism of parallel litigation of international civil and commercial affairs in China on the basis of the above mentioned parts. We should adapt to the changes of the times and change our country's inherent perspective and thinking on the issue of parallel litigation in international civil and commercial affairs. On the other hand, we should study the possible ways to coordinate the problem of parallel litigation of international civil and commercial affairs in China on the basis of concrete measures. In order to perfect the coordination mechanism of parallel litigation of international civil and commercial affairs in our country, solve transnational civil disputes fairly and reasonably in judicial practice, and promote the smooth progress of transnational civil communication.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王忠清;從一實(shí)例看我產(chǎn)品在美之責(zé)任訴訟問題[J];律師世界;1995年10期

2 強(qiáng)顯禎;國豐華;;淺談涉港民事平行訴訟問題的協(xié)調(diào)[J];山東審判;2007年02期

3 任秀芳;曹建波;;公司設(shè)立無效訴訟問題思考[J];浙江萬里學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年04期

4 王玉靜;;禁訴令在解決海峽兩岸平行訴訟問題的展望與適用[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年12期

5 夏先鵬;林欣宇;;論兩岸民商事平行訴訟問題的法律規(guī)制[J];海峽法學(xué);2013年01期

6 劉樂才;;關(guān)于公益訴訟問題的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年10期

7 林峰;;中W內(nèi)地和香港的同案重復(fù)訴訟問題(英文)[J];中國法律;2009年04期

8 ;重大污染事故后的訴訟問題[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2010年37期

9 徐曉光;;黔東南小江流域的林契及相關(guān)訴訟問題[J];原生態(tài)民族文化學(xué)刊;2012年01期

10 賴紫寧;;兩岸民事平行訴訟問題及其解決方法探析[J];法律適用;2008年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 田東紅;265家今年涉訴 上市公司維權(quán)意識增強(qiáng)[N];上海證券報;2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 龍靚;我國國際民商事平行訴訟問題研究[D];福州大學(xué);2014年

2 孫蕾;平行訴訟問題研究[D];青島大學(xué);2007年

3 趙素萍;平行訴訟問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2004年

4 李笑e，

本文編號：1578835