發(fā)布時間：2018-03-07 01:23

  本文選題：政府信息公開訴訟　切入點(diǎn)：反信息公開訴訟　出處：《海南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：權(quán)利的實(shí)現(xiàn)需要制度的保障,知情權(quán)是公民的一項基本權(quán)利,為了在制度上更好的維護(hù)和保障公民知情權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn),國務(wù)院于2008年頒布實(shí)施了《中華人民共和國政府信息公開條例》(以下簡稱《條例》)、最高人民法院2011年頒布了《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理政府信息公開行政案件若干問題的規(guī)定》(以下簡稱《若干規(guī)定》),該《條例》及《若干規(guī)定》從法律層面上承認(rèn)了公民部分知情權(quán),同時為保證公民知情權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)還提供了救濟(jì)途徑,即公民、法人或其他組織可以根據(jù)現(xiàn)實(shí)情況提起政府信息公開訴訟。適格的原告資格是上述不同類型政府信息公開訴訟順利進(jìn)行的前提條件,但由于我國政府信息公開訴訟實(shí)踐時間較短,《條例》、《若干規(guī)定》中對信息公開訴訟原告資格的認(rèn)定具有模糊性,加之《條例》、《若干規(guī)定》中原告資格的規(guī)定與《中華人民共和國行政訴訟法》(以下簡稱《行政訴訟法》)銜接上的空白,使得“政府信息公開訴訟”和“反信息公開訴訟”在實(shí)踐中都出現(xiàn)了諸多困境,其中“政府信息公開訴訟”和“反信息公開訴訟”案件的復(fù)雜性以及這兩類訴訟原告資格的特殊性,使得政府信息公開訴訟中原告資格的認(rèn)定存在標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不一、認(rèn)定混亂的情況,很多的政府信息公開訴訟因原告不適格而被排除在司法程序之外,行政相對人的知情權(quán)及自身的合法權(quán)益無法得到確實(shí)的保障。 本文的結(jié)構(gòu)主要由引言、四部分內(nèi)容和結(jié)語組成。第一部分介紹了政府信息公開訴訟原告資格的一般理論,具體包括政府信息公開訴訟的概念、特征以及政府信息公開訴訟的原告資格認(rèn)定的規(guī)則和相關(guān)規(guī)定。 第二部分主要闡述了我國政府信息公開訴訟原告資格認(rèn)定存在的問題及原因,主要問題是原告資格標(biāo)準(zhǔn)選擇不明確,同案不同判；原告范圍狹窄,訴權(quán)無法保障；原告資格認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)內(nèi)涵不明確,濫訴案件數(shù)量增長。造成這些問題的主要原因是條例與法律銜接上的斷層、行政公益訴訟制度缺位、政府信息公開訴訟沒有類型化以及相關(guān)法律概念界定模糊。 第三部分主要闡述了政府信息公開訴訟原告資格認(rèn)定的域外考察及啟示,該部分介紹了英美法系及大陸法系具有代表性的國家,即英國、美國、德國和日本關(guān)于政府信息公開訴訟原告資格認(rèn)定的相關(guān)規(guī)定,以及這些域外法對我國的啟示。 第四部分論述了完善我國政府信息公開訴訟原告資格認(rèn)定的設(shè)想,首先完善三種類型政府信息公開訴訟原告資格的認(rèn)定；其次細(xì)化政府信息公開訴訟中原告資格認(rèn)定涉及的相關(guān)概念。
[Abstract]:The realization of right needs the guarantee of system, the right to know is a basic right of citizens, in order to better safeguard and guarantee the realization of citizens' right to know in the system, On 2008, the State Council promulgated and implemented the regulations of the people's Republic of China on the publicity of Government Information (hereinafter referred to as the regulations), and the Supreme people's Court promulgated the Supreme people's Court on 2011 on several administrative cases concerning the trial of government information disclosure. The provisions of the question (hereinafter referred to as "certain provisions"), the regulations and the "certain provisions" recognize the right of some citizens to know at the legal level, At the same time, in order to ensure the realization of citizens' right to know, it also provides a remedy, that is, citizens, A legal person or other organization may file a lawsuit for disclosure of government information according to the actual situation. The qualification of the plaintiff is the prerequisite for the smooth proceeding of the different types of government information disclosure proceedings mentioned above. However, due to the short practice time of our government information disclosure litigation, the confirmation of plaintiff's qualification in "regulations" and "several provisions" is vague. In addition to the regulations, the gap in the connection between the qualification of the plaintiff and the Administrative Litigation Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Administrative Litigation Law), As a result, both "government information publicity litigation" and "anti-information publicity litigation" have encountered many difficulties in practice. The complexity of the cases of "public government information litigation" and "anti-information disclosure litigation" and the particularity of the plaintiff's qualifications of these two kinds of litigation make the standard of the plaintiff's qualification in the government information disclosure litigation different, and the situation of disordered identification. Many public litigation of government information is excluded from the judicial procedure because the plaintiff is unfit, and the right to know and the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart can not be guaranteed. The structure of this paper is mainly composed of introduction, four parts and conclusion. The first part introduces the general theory of plaintiff's qualification of government information disclosure litigation, including the concept of government information disclosure litigation. Characteristics and the rules and relevant regulations of plaintiff qualification in public government information litigation. The second part mainly expounds the problems and reasons of the plaintiff qualification in our government information publicity litigation. The main problems are that the standard of plaintiff qualification is not clear, the same case is different, the scope of plaintiff is narrow, and the litigation right can not be guaranteed. The standard of plaintiff qualification is not clear, and the number of cases is increasing. The main causes of these problems are the gap between the regulations and the law, and the absence of the administrative public interest litigation system. There is no classification and vague definition of relevant legal concepts in public litigation of government information. The third part mainly elaborated the government information disclosure litigation plaintiff qualification confirmation outside the investigation and the enlightenment, this part introduced the common law system and the civil law system representative country, namely the United Kingdom, the United States, Germany and Japan on the government information disclosure litigation plaintiff qualification of the relevant provisions, as well as these extraterritorial laws on China's enlightenment. Part 4th discusses the assumption of perfecting the qualification of plaintiff in the litigation of government information disclosure in our country. Firstly, it consummates the confirmation of the plaintiff's qualification of three types of public litigation of government information. Secondly, the government information disclosure litigation involved in the qualification of the plaintiff involved in the concept.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 周佑勇;;論行政裁量的利益溝通方式[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2008年03期

2 林鴻潮;許蓮麗;;論政府信息公開訴訟中的證明責(zé)任[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2009年01期

3 黃學(xué)賢;;行政訴訟原告資格若干問題探討[J];法學(xué);2006年08期

4 韓鳳然;郝靜;;政府信息公開之配套法律制度研究[J];河北法學(xué);2010年03期

5 董妍;;政府信息公開訴訟雙重訴訟利益解析[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年05期

6 徐超華;;政府信息公開中的個人信息保護(hù)研究[J];四川教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年04期

7 王振清;;政府信息公開訴訟原告資格問題研究[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2009年04期

8 章劍生;;知情權(quán)及其保障——以《政府信息公開條例》為例[J];中國法學(xué);2008年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 董妍;中美政府信息公開訴訟制度比較研究[D];南開大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1577348