發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-06 20:03

  本文選題：刑事訴訟　切入點(diǎn)：電子證據(jù)　出處：《西南民族大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2012我國(guó)新刑事訴訟法第四十八條規(guī)定：“可以用于證明案件真相的材料，都是證據(jù)。證據(jù)包括：（一）物證；（二）書(shū)證；（三）證人證言；（四）被害人陳述；（五）犯罪嫌疑人、被告人供述和辯解；（六）鑒定意見(jiàn)；（七）勘驗(yàn)、檢查、辨認(rèn)、偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)等筆錄；（八）視聽(tīng)資料、電子數(shù)據(jù)。證據(jù)必須經(jīng)過(guò)查證屬實(shí)，才能作為定案的根據(jù)�！弊鳛橐环N新入法的刑事證據(jù)的表現(xiàn)形式，電子證據(jù)在刑事訴訟中的具體運(yùn)用仍存在非常多問(wèn)題。筆者以刑事電子證據(jù)問(wèn)題研究為題進(jìn)行了研究。從刑事訴訟中的電子證據(jù)的概念及特點(diǎn)入手，研究了以下幾個(gè)問(wèn)題：第一章，主要對(duì)電子證據(jù)的概念、特點(diǎn)及其證明力進(jìn)行了認(rèn)真分析，為后文中電子證據(jù)的收集、審查及其證明規(guī)則等問(wèn)題的研究提供理論基礎(chǔ)。第二章，主要就國(guó)內(nèi)外電子證據(jù)的研究現(xiàn)狀及電子證據(jù)在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中面對(duì)的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析，提出應(yīng)當(dāng)加強(qiáng)對(duì)司法機(jī)關(guān)工作人員進(jìn)行計(jì)算機(jī)專門知識(shí)技能培訓(xùn)，鼓勵(lì)電子證據(jù)領(lǐng)域相關(guān)專門公司介入，進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)法律專家和電子計(jì)算機(jī)專家的合作，，加強(qiáng)在電子證據(jù)方面的國(guó)際合作。第三章，主要對(duì)電子證據(jù)在新刑事訴訟法背景下的收集、保全與運(yùn)用進(jìn)行分析，提出不能為了完成收集電子證據(jù)就置人權(quán)保障于不顧，在針對(duì)電子證據(jù)采用措施時(shí)，必須要履行法定的人權(quán)保護(hù)的義務(wù)、保護(hù)公民合法權(quán)利和自由、進(jìn)一步貫徹相稱性原則；在保全電子證據(jù)時(shí)要滿足電子證據(jù)保全方法和規(guī)范性的特殊要求；在電子證據(jù)的運(yùn)用中應(yīng)當(dāng)改變我國(guó)目前對(duì)電子證據(jù)的研究現(xiàn)狀，并借鑒國(guó)外的有利經(jīng)驗(yàn)、結(jié)合自身的實(shí)際情況以完善我國(guó)電子證據(jù)的具體運(yùn)用規(guī)則，保障司法實(shí)踐的順利進(jìn)行。第四章，闡述電子證據(jù)和司法鑒定的銜接問(wèn)題，主要包括電子證據(jù)鑒定的證據(jù)制度、管理制度和訴訟制度。
[Abstract]:Article 48th of China's new Criminal procedure Law states: "the materials that can be used to prove the truth of the case are all evidence. Evidence includes: (1) physical evidence (2) documentary evidence (3) witness testimony (4) victim statement (5) criminal suspect, Testimony and justification of the defendant (6) expert opinions (7) record of investigation, inspection, identification, investigation, etc. (8) Audio-visual materials and electronic data. Evidence must be verified and verified. "as a form of expression of new criminal evidence," There are still many problems in the concrete application of electronic evidence in criminal procedure. The following problems are studied: in chapter one, the concept, characteristics and proof power of electronic evidence are analyzed carefully, which provides a theoretical basis for the collection, examination and proof rules of electronic evidence. This paper analyzes the current research situation of electronic evidence at home and abroad and the problems faced by electronic evidence in the judicial practice of our country, and puts forward that we should strengthen the training of computer specialized knowledge and skills for judicial staff. Encouraging the involvement of relevant specialized companies in the field of electronic evidence to further strengthen cooperation between legal experts and computer experts, as well as international cooperation in electronic evidence... It mainly analyzes the collection, preservation and application of electronic evidence in the context of the new Criminal procedure Law, and points out that human rights should not be safeguarded in order to complete the collection of electronic evidence, and when adopting measures against electronic evidence, It is necessary to fulfill the obligation of legal protection of human rights, protect the legal rights and freedoms of citizens, further implement the principle of proportionality, and meet the special requirements of methods and norms of preservation of electronic evidence when preserving electronic evidence. In the application of electronic evidence, we should change the current research status of electronic evidence in our country, and learn from the beneficial experience of foreign countries, combine with our own actual situation to perfect the concrete application rules of electronic evidence in our country. Chapter 4th describes the connection between electronic evidence and judicial expertise, including the evidence system of electronic evidence identification, management system and litigation system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 馬柳穎;論電子證據(jù)可靠性規(guī)則構(gòu)建[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年07期

2 張松;邵宏雷;馬曼;;刑事案件中電子證據(jù)的特征及適用規(guī)則探討[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2012年08期

3 邵躋;;刑事訴訟電子證據(jù)保全芻議[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年13期

4 蘇云;王建濤;;電子取證的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及其規(guī)制[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年10期

5 胡志毅;;試論刑事訴訟中電子證據(jù)的鑒定和運(yùn)用[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2007年01期

6 楊郁娟;;從司法鑒定的證據(jù)屬性看司法鑒定制度改革[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2009年06期

7 李震宇;;電子證據(jù)的新探[J];網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全技術(shù)與應(yīng)用;2011年12期

8 高峰;鄒積超;;試論刑事訴訟中電子證據(jù)的審查[J];信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全;2011年09期

9 喬洪翔;宗淼;;論刑事電子證據(jù)的取證程序——以計(jì)算機(jī)及網(wǎng)絡(luò)為主要視角[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

本文編號(hào)：1576275