本文選題：刑事和解　切入點(diǎn)：恢復(fù)性司法　出處：《煙臺(tái)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：新刑訴法將刑事和解程序作了專(zhuān)章規(guī)定，刑訴解釋和高檢規(guī)則對(duì)刑事和解的具體適用作了相關(guān)補(bǔ)充和細(xì)致化處理，標(biāo)志著刑事和解制度正式作為一項(xiàng)重要的特別程序被確定下來(lái)。我國(guó)刑事和解制度是指在公安司法機(jī)關(guān)主持或調(diào)停下，刑事訴訟雙方通過(guò)協(xié)商達(dá)成合意，加害人履行賠償協(xié)議同時(shí)獲取從寬或免予刑事處罰的制度。在我國(guó)倡導(dǎo)構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)的政策背景和法治理念下，以實(shí)現(xiàn)被害人利益保護(hù)和侵害人更好回歸社會(huì)為目標(biāo)的刑事和解制度，其價(jià)值追求和獨(dú)特視角閃耀著理性和民主的光芒。本文以域外恢復(fù)性司法理念為切入點(diǎn)，系統(tǒng)介紹我國(guó)刑事和解的獨(dú)有特點(diǎn)和制度價(jià)值，通過(guò)借鑒域外恢復(fù)性司法經(jīng)驗(yàn)和分析總結(jié)目前和解制度存在的問(wèn)題和不足，提出我國(guó)和解制度的完善建議，實(shí)現(xiàn)與我國(guó)刑事理念和政策的完美契合。本文正文分為三個(gè)部分： 第一章：刑事和解制度考察，探究了恢復(fù)性司法的由來(lái)、理念和刑事和解的淵源，對(duì)外國(guó)恢復(fù)性司法制度進(jìn)行了介紹，從理論和實(shí)踐兩角度對(duì)我國(guó)新刑訴法視野下的刑事和解制度做出解讀，分析了我國(guó)刑事和解的制度特點(diǎn)和價(jià)值。 第二章：我國(guó)刑事和解制度的問(wèn)題和不足，指出刑事和解缺失本土理論支撐和制度模式上存在欠缺，在司法實(shí)踐中有被異化之風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。 第三章：關(guān)于刑事和解制度的完善建議，提出要立足于中國(guó)法治思想，樹(shù)立刑事和解的和諧理念，彌補(bǔ)制度設(shè)計(jì)之不足，，通過(guò)立法構(gòu)建完善的刑事和解體系，通過(guò)司法解釋細(xì)化具體的操作規(guī)范，主張?jiān)谒痉▽?shí)踐中嚴(yán)格貫徹公開(kāi)透明原則和即時(shí)履行原則。
[Abstract]:The new Criminal procedure Law provides a special chapter on the procedure of criminal reconciliation, and the interpretation of criminal proceedings and the rules of high inspection have made relevant supplementary and meticulous treatment to the specific application of criminal reconciliation. It marks that the criminal reconciliation system has been formally established as an important special procedure. The criminal reconciliation system in China means that under the auspices or mediation of the public security and judicial organs, the two sides of the criminal procedure have reached an agreement through consultation. Under the policy background and legal concept of advocating the construction of a harmonious society in our country, the offender can obtain leniency or exemption from criminal punishment at the same time in fulfilling the compensation agreement. The criminal reconciliation system with the goal of realizing the protection of the victim's interests and the better return of the aggressor to the society has its value pursuit and unique angle of view sparkling with the light of reason and democracy. This paper takes the idea of extraterritorial restorative justice as the breakthrough point. This paper systematically introduces the unique characteristics and system value of criminal reconciliation in our country, and by drawing lessons from the experience of restorative justice abroad and analyzing and summarizing the problems and shortcomings existing in the present reconciliation system, puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of the reconciliation system in our country. The text of this paper is divided into three parts:. The first chapter: the investigation of criminal reconciliation system, explores the origin of restorative justice, the concept and the origin of criminal reconciliation, introduces the foreign restorative justice system. From the angle of theory and practice, this paper interprets the system of criminal reconciliation from the perspective of the new criminal procedure law, and analyzes the characteristics and value of the system of criminal reconciliation in our country. The second chapter: the problems and deficiencies of the criminal reconciliation system in China, pointing out that the lack of local theoretical support and institutional model of criminal reconciliation is deficient, and there is a risk of alienation in judicial practice. The third chapter: about the criminal reconciliation system consummation suggestion, proposed must base on the Chinese rule of law thought, establishes the criminal reconciliation harmonious idea, makes up the system design insufficiency, through the legislation constructs the perfect criminal reconciliation system, The principle of openness and transparency and the principle of immediate performance should be strictly carried out in judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 楊興培;;刑事和解制度在中國(guó)的構(gòu)建[J];法學(xué);2006年08期

2 顧敏康;;保護(hù)被害人權(quán)利:刑事司法改革的新里程[J];法學(xué);2007年06期

3 陳瑞華;;刑事訴訟的私力合作模式——刑事和解在中國(guó)的興起[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2006年05期

本文編號(hào)：1574873