本文選題：指定居所監(jiān)視居住　切入點(diǎn)：刑事訴訟法　出處：《蘇州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2012年3月，第十一屆全國(guó)人民代表大會(huì)對(duì)《中華人民共和國(guó)刑事訴訟法》進(jìn)行了第二次修改，，監(jiān)視居住強(qiáng)制措施部分也有了大幅修改，特別是增加了指定居所監(jiān)視居住措施，成為我國(guó)司法改革的又一亮點(diǎn)。修法之前的司法實(shí)踐中，監(jiān)視居住強(qiáng)制措施的適用率偏低，在適用過(guò)程中又出現(xiàn)變相羈押嫌疑人、被告人等諸多弊端，所以多年來(lái)法學(xué)界對(duì)監(jiān)視居住制度一直存在著“改造論”與“廢除論”兩種對(duì)立的觀點(diǎn)。新《刑事訴訟法》的修改采納了“改造論”的觀點(diǎn)，在監(jiān)視居住的適用范圍、適用條件與適用方式等方面進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的規(guī)定，并增加了指定居所監(jiān)視居住。這一新的規(guī)定也引起了社會(huì)各界廣泛關(guān)注。為保障犯罪嫌疑人的人權(quán)，有效防止偵查機(jī)關(guān)濫用公權(quán)力，本文在考察新刑訴法修訂實(shí)施為背景的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)指定居所監(jiān)視居住的適用條件、執(zhí)行場(chǎng)所與執(zhí)行方法、如何保障被指定居所監(jiān)視居住犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的合法權(quán)益，以及人民檢察院如何對(duì)指定居所監(jiān)視居住進(jìn)行監(jiān)督等問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了深入研究，探求在司法實(shí)踐中既能實(shí)現(xiàn)指定居所監(jiān)視居住的法定功能，又防止將其異化為羈押措施。希望通過(guò)本研究明析指定監(jiān)視居住制度存在的不足之處以及今后進(jìn)一步完善的方向。
[Abstract]:In March 2012, the eleventh session of the National People's Congress of the second amendment of the criminal procedure law of People's Republic of China < >, residential surveillance coercive measures are also part of the substantial changes, especially the increase of designated residential monitoring measures, has become another highlight of the judicial reform in our country. The judicial practice law before, the applicable rate of compulsory measures residential surveillance is low, and the emergence of disguised suspects in the application process, the defendant and other defects, so for many years the jurisprudence of the residential surveillance system has been the existence of "transformation theory" and "the abolition of the" two opposing points of view. The new "criminal procedural law > Modify adopted" transformation "theory point of view and in the scope of residential surveillance, the applicable conditions and applicable methods in detail, and an increase in the designated residence under surveillance. This new rule has also aroused the Attention. For the protection of the rights of criminal suspects, effectively prevent the investigation organs abuse of public power, based on the investigation of the new criminal procedure law for the implementation of the revised on the basis of the background of the specified conditions for residence under surveillance, the implementation of the place and the implementation method, how to guarantee the assigned residence under surveillance of criminal suspects, the legitimate interests of the defendant. The people's Procuratorate, and conducts an in-depth study on the problem of how to specify the residential monitoring supervision, explore in judicial practice can not only realize the specified legal functions of residence under surveillance, and prevent the alienation of custody measures. Want to specify the shortcomings of residential surveillance system as well as the future direction of further research by the analysis.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 孫煜華;;指定居所監(jiān)視居住的合憲性審視[J];法學(xué);2013年06期

2 蔡福華;嚴(yán)義挺;;論指定居所監(jiān)視居住在自偵案件中的正確運(yùn)用[J];福建法學(xué);2013年03期

3 張兆松;;論指定居所監(jiān)視居住適用中的若干爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題[J];法治研究;2014年01期

本文編號(hào)：1571265