本文選題：民事速裁　切入點(diǎn)：民事審判程序　出處：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：司法審判資源的匱乏和民商事案件爆炸性增長的矛盾,是當(dāng)前我國司法審判所面臨的典型矛盾之一。在這種矛盾的影響下,人民法院的審判工作也承受著巨大的壓力,僅利用傳統(tǒng)審判模式已經(jīng)難以滿足實(shí)際需求。為了緩解這一矛盾,改革現(xiàn)行的民事審判方式從而提高審判效率,在我國民事司法實(shí)踐中施行簡易快速裁判,即所謂的“民事速裁”,成為了解決這一矛盾的舉措之一,民事速裁程序的應(yīng)用也成為了我國民事司法審判實(shí)踐的必然選擇。本文通過運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)研究法、實(shí)證分析法、對比分析法以及歸納總結(jié)法等,對當(dāng)前我國民事速裁程序進(jìn)行了必要分析。文章首先介紹的是民事速裁程序的基本概念和性質(zhì),初步了解了速裁在我國民事訴訟法中的定位。通過對民事速裁的特征與設(shè)置原理的分析,認(rèn)識(shí)到了設(shè)置民事速裁程序的必要性。指出該程序同簡易、小額程序之間的關(guān)系,進(jìn)一步明確該程序存在的合理性；其次,本文對當(dāng)前域外兩大法系民事速裁的相關(guān)規(guī)定進(jìn)行了考察分析,同時(shí)歸納其特點(diǎn)并以資借鑒；接著,本文對我國目前民事速裁程序的現(xiàn)狀及運(yùn)行情況進(jìn)行了考察。通過考察發(fā)現(xiàn),我國實(shí)踐中的民事速裁程序存在著程序定位不清,當(dāng)事人程序選擇權(quán)有待保障以及我國民事速裁程序同非速裁程序轉(zhuǎn)換銜接機(jī)制尚不健全等一系列問題。本文認(rèn)為,為了解決上述問題,首先要從立法層面給予民事速裁程序合理定位,其次要從適用范圍和審級(jí)這兩方面保證當(dāng)事人的程序選擇權(quán),最后是要進(jìn)一步實(shí)現(xiàn)科學(xué)高效地程序轉(zhuǎn)換與銜接機(jī)制。本文研究的主要目的是能夠使人們對我國民事速裁程序有更加深刻地認(rèn)識(shí),通過完善民事速裁程序促使我國民事司法審判效率得以提升。
[Abstract]:The contradiction between the scarcity of judicial resources and the explosive growth of civil and commercial cases is one of the typical contradictions facing the judicial trial in our country at present. Under the influence of this contradiction, the trial work of the people's court is also under great pressure. It is difficult to satisfy the actual demand only by using the traditional trial mode. In order to alleviate this contradiction, to reform the current civil trial mode and to improve the trial efficiency, to implement the simple and fast judgment in the civil judicial practice of our country. The so-called "civil quick adjudication" has become one of the measures to solve this contradiction, and the application of civil adjudication procedure has become an inevitable choice in our country's civil judicial practice. In this paper, the author makes a necessary analysis of the civil quick adjudication procedure in our country by means of comparative analysis and inductive summing method. Firstly, this paper introduces the basic concept and nature of the civil quick adjudication procedure. This paper preliminarily understands the orientation of quick adjudication in the civil procedure law of our country. By analyzing the characteristics and setting principle of civil quick adjudication, it realizes the necessity of setting up civil quick adjudication procedure, and points out the relationship between this procedure and the simple and small amount procedure. To further clarify the rationality of the existence of the procedure; secondly, this paper reviews and analyzes the relevant provisions of the current civil speedup in the two foreign legal systems, and summarizes its characteristics and uses for reference. This paper investigates the current situation and operation of the civil quick adjudication procedure in our country. It is found that the civil quick adjudication procedure in our country has a unclear orientation in practice. There are a series of problems, such as the parties' choice of procedure to be protected, and the transition mechanism between the civil quick adjudication procedure and the non-quick adjudication procedure in our country are not perfect. This paper holds that, in order to solve the above problems, First of all, it is necessary to give a reasonable position to the civil adjudication procedure from the legislative level, and secondly, to guarantee the parties' choice of procedure from the two aspects of the scope of application and the level of trial. Finally, it is necessary to realize the scientific and efficient procedure conversion and convergence mechanism. The main purpose of this paper is to enable people to have a deeper understanding of the civil adjudication procedure in China. Improve the civil adjudication procedure to promote the efficiency of civil justice in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 葉蓮,梁文,周蹈;廣西法院系統(tǒng)適用簡易程序的調(diào)查與分析[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

2 朱五星;簡易程序適用范圍改革芻議[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

3 趙艷秋;;簡易程序的簡化及其相對獨(dú)立性特性研究[J];東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

4 劉超;李繼業(yè);;再論簡易程序之完善——以程序基本權(quán)的保障為視角[J];河北大學(xué)成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

5 張靜靜;;行政簡易程序初探[J];滄州師范�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

6 許芯;;外匯行政處罰簡易程序運(yùn)用現(xiàn)狀及改進(jìn)[J];金融縱橫;2012年10期

7 王俊;關(guān)于簡易程序答辯期的思考[J];上海市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年05期

8 初立君;兩岸民事訴訟簡易程序若干問題比較[J];湖南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

9 李華,相慶梅;論簡易程序中的人權(quán)保障[J];河南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

10 舒瑤芝;仲裁簡易程序適用探討[J];杭州商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前7條

1 歸東;何建軍;;適用簡易程序?qū)徖戆讣嬖诘膯栴}及對策[A];第三屆貴州法學(xué)論壇文集[C];2001年

2 歸東;何建軍;;適用簡易程序?qū)徖戆讣嬖诘膯栴}及對策[A];貴州法學(xué)論壇第三屆文集[C];2001年

3 樊紅凝;孟健;;公訴案件適用簡易程序工作機(jī)制研究[A];第八屆國家高級(jí)檢察官論壇論文集：審判程序的修改對公訴工作的挑戰(zhàn)[C];2012年

4 陳亮;;簡易程序出庭對公訴工作的挑戰(zhàn)及對策[A];第八屆國家高級(jí)檢察官論壇論文集：審判程序的修改對公訴工作的挑戰(zhàn)[C];2012年

5 古正宇;;公訴案件簡易程序下檢察監(jiān)督職能探析[A];第八屆國家高級(jí)檢察官論壇論文集：審判程序的修改對公訴工作的挑戰(zhàn)[C];2012年

6 張淑芳;;論行政簡易程序[A];中國法學(xué)會(huì)行政法學(xué)研究會(huì)2009年年會(huì)論文集（上冊）[C];2009年

7 熊文釗;吳e，

本文編號(hào)：1563972