本文關(guān)鍵詞： 電子證據(jù) 收集 證明過程 立法建議　出處：《天津師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：如今科技發(fā)展日新月異,發(fā)展速度更是超乎想象。伴隨而來的是電子證據(jù)在司法實(shí)踐中的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展受阻,立法明顯跟不上實(shí)踐前進(jìn)的步伐,也無法滿足當(dāng)事人的需要。相比較而言,我國關(guān)于電子證據(jù)的立法落后于西方國家,盡管近些年來各界學(xué)者和立法者做了不少努力,但總的來說,還不夠詳盡完善,存在諸多看法不一的地方。在我國,對于電子證據(jù)的存在著內(nèi)涵認(rèn)識不一的情況；在當(dāng)事人及其律師收集固定電子證據(jù)方面,法律條文缺乏實(shí)際性的指引作用；舉證、質(zhì)證環(huán)節(jié)以及認(rèn)證規(guī)則方面還存在著諸多的不完善的地方。為了解決這些問題,筆者比較分析了國外相關(guān)規(guī)定,結(jié)合我國立法和司法現(xiàn)狀,對電子證據(jù)相關(guān)立法提出建議,并對電子證據(jù)在司法實(shí)踐中遇到的問題進(jìn)行分析,以期對我國電子證據(jù)進(jìn)一步研究有所貢獻(xiàn)。 文章分為四個部分： 第一部分是電子證據(jù)概述,涉及的是電子證據(jù)的相關(guān)基礎(chǔ)性問題。主要介紹了電子證據(jù)的概念、特征及常見的關(guān)于電子證據(jù)的分類,并且在此基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合新《民事訴訟法》對法定證據(jù)類型的規(guī)定,針對目前可能存在的關(guān)于電子證據(jù)與視聽資料界定不清問題進(jìn)行探討,提出應(yīng)重新界定視聽資料內(nèi)涵的這一觀點(diǎn)。 第二部分是我國民事訴訟法視野下電子證據(jù)的收集與保全研究。主要分為兩個部分：首先是電子證據(jù)的收集,對收集的一般性原則和具體操作方法兩個方面進(jìn)行了全面的闡述,隨后指出了目前在我國電子證據(jù)收集過程中應(yīng)注意的兩個問題,即隱私權(quán)保護(hù)和電子證據(jù)收集范圍問題；其次是電子證據(jù)的保全,它屬于收集的繼續(xù),筆者主要對目前運(yùn)用較廣的電子證據(jù)的公證保全作了詳細(xì)論述。 第三部分是根據(jù)電子證據(jù)在證明過程中所必經(jīng)的環(huán)節(jié)進(jìn)行分析。首先是電子證據(jù)的舉證,在電子證據(jù)的舉證方面,對與電子證據(jù)舉證密切相關(guān)的兩個問題,即電子證據(jù)的“原件”與“復(fù)印件”認(rèn)定和舉證責(zé)任分擔(dān)進(jìn)行了分析：其次在電子證據(jù)質(zhì)證方面,針對電子證據(jù)存在的高科技性、無形性等特點(diǎn),為確保質(zhì)證環(huán)節(jié)的順利進(jìn)行,筆者提出了“專家輔助人制度”和多媒體示證的建議；最后分析電子證據(jù)認(rèn)證的內(nèi)容。 第四部分是關(guān)于電子證據(jù)相關(guān)立法研究,這是全文的落腳點(diǎn)和最終要解決的問題。首先是對電子證據(jù)的域外立法例考察,主要是對英美法系和大陸法系主要國家從宏觀和微觀的角度進(jìn)行比較研究,對下文中我國立法模式的選擇起到了參考作用。其后在總結(jié)我國現(xiàn)行電子證據(jù)相關(guān)立法現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上,指出電子證據(jù)規(guī)范的不足,并在此基礎(chǔ)上,對我國的電子證據(jù)立法提出建議,這也是本文的寫作目的所在。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of science and technology, the speed of development is beyond imagination. With this, the further development of electronic evidence in judicial practice has been blocked, and the legislation has obviously failed to keep up with the pace of the progress of practice. By comparison, our legislation on electronic evidence lags behind that of western countries. Although scholars and legislators from all walks of life have made a lot of efforts in recent years, on the whole, it is not complete enough. There are many different views. In our country, the existence of electronic evidence has different connotations; in the collection of fixed electronic evidence by the parties and their lawyers, the legal provisions lack of practical guidance; There are still many imperfections in cross-examination and authentication rules. In order to solve these problems, the author compares and analyzes the relevant provisions of foreign countries, and puts forward some suggestions on legislation related to electronic evidence combined with the current situation of legislation and judicature in our country. The problems of electronic evidence in judicial practice are analyzed in order to contribute to the further study of electronic evidence in China. The article is divided into four parts:. The first part is an overview of electronic evidence, which involves the basic issues related to electronic evidence. It mainly introduces the concept, characteristics and classification of electronic evidence, and on this basis, Combined with the provisions of the new Civil procedure Law on the types of legal evidence, this paper probes into the existing problems of unclear definition of electronic evidence and audio-visual materials, and puts forward the view that the connotation of audio-visual materials should be redefined. The second part is the research on the collection and preservation of electronic evidence in the field of civil procedure law of our country. It is mainly divided into two parts: first, the collection of electronic evidence, The general principles and concrete operation methods of collection are expounded comprehensively, and then two problems that should be paid attention to in the process of collecting electronic evidence in our country are pointed out, that is, the protection of privacy and the scope of electronic evidence collection. Secondly, the preservation of electronic evidence, which is the continuation of collection, is discussed in detail. The third part is according to the electronic evidence in the proof process essential link carries on the analysis. First, is the electronic evidence proof, in the electronic evidence proof aspect, is closely related to the electronic evidence proof two questions, That is, the "original" and "photocopy" of electronic evidence are identified and the burden of proof is shared. Secondly, in the aspect of electronic evidence cross-examination, aiming at the characteristics of high technology and intangibility of electronic evidence, in order to ensure the smooth progress of cross-examination, The author puts forward the suggestion of "expert Auxiliary system" and multimedia proof, and finally analyzes the content of electronic evidence authentication. The 4th part is about the electronic evidence related legislation research, this is the full text's foothold and the question which must solve finally. First, is to the electronic evidence extraterritorial legislation example inspection, This is mainly a comparative study of the major countries in the common law system and the civil law system from the macro and micro perspectives. Then, on the basis of summing up the current legislation situation of electronic evidence in our country, pointing out the deficiency of electronic evidence standard, and on this basis, It is also the purpose of this paper to put forward suggestions on the legislation of electronic evidence in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.13

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 潘亞奇;;電子證據(jù)證明力問題之法律思考[J];前沿;2010年23期

2 張謙;論電子證據(jù)在民事訴訟中的運(yùn)用[J];人民司法;2002年04期

3 梁靜;;電子證據(jù)在刑事訴訟中的收集與認(rèn)證[J];河南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2012年04期

4 甘其先;宋秀麗;;電子證據(jù)保全系統(tǒng)的設(shè)計與實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];信息安全與通信保密;2011年09期

5 全亮;;論原件與原本——兼辨復(fù)制件與副本[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年05期

6 沈益平;析數(shù)據(jù)電文的證據(jù)效力[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2000年04期

7 何月;;電子證據(jù)的歸屬及證明力研究[J];信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全;2010年11期

8 姜偉,史衛(wèi)忠;運(yùn)用多媒體示證的理論思考[J];中國法學(xué);2001年06期

9 何悅;劉云龍;;電子證據(jù)保全公證若干問題研究[J];中國發(fā)展;2012年02期

，

本文編號：1524706