附條件不起訴監(jiān)督考察制度研究
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 附條件不起訴 監(jiān)督考察 檢察機(jī)關(guān) 社會(huì)內(nèi)處遇 出處:《江西師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:附條件不起訴制度的宗旨是將少年罪錯(cuò)行為從審判程序中分流出去,讓其在社會(huì)中反省過錯(cuò),改正不良行為,修復(fù)被破壞的社會(huì)關(guān)系,反映了現(xiàn)代輕刑化、教育刑和恢復(fù)性司法理念。如何對(duì)附條件不起訴對(duì)象進(jìn)行監(jiān)督考察是附條件不起訴正確實(shí)施的關(guān)鍵。我國附條件不起訴制度實(shí)施的時(shí)間較短,對(duì)附條件不起訴對(duì)象的監(jiān)督考察制度研究還較少,監(jiān)督考察工作在各地的發(fā)展不均衡。在一些經(jīng)濟(jì)比較發(fā)達(dá)的地區(qū)的檢察機(jī)關(guān)開展了各具特色的監(jiān)督考察工作,如北京專門建設(shè)了專門的幫教考察基地,上海的一些基層檢察院則通過政府購買社工服務(wù)的形式來開展監(jiān)督考察工作,而更多地區(qū)的監(jiān)督考察工作存在流于形式的危險(xiǎn)。監(jiān)督考察是附條件不起訴制度的正確實(shí)施的保證,為了促進(jìn)附條件不起訴對(duì)象的監(jiān)督考察制度的理論研究和實(shí)踐發(fā)展,筆者從以下四部分對(duì)本制度進(jìn)行了論述。實(shí)踐離不開理論的指導(dǎo),第一部分筆者對(duì)附條件不起訴監(jiān)督考察制度的基本理論進(jìn)行了論述。梳理了附條件不起訴的發(fā)展歷程,并結(jié)合國內(nèi)外對(duì)附條件不起訴制度的實(shí)踐,明確了附條件不起訴制度的概念和特征,介紹了我國附條件不起訴監(jiān)督考察制度的基本法律規(guī)定。第二部分,探討了附條件不起訴監(jiān)督考察制度的基本任務(wù),應(yīng)該包括監(jiān)督管理、教育矯治、懲罰并預(yù)防犯罪、修復(fù)被破壞的社會(huì)關(guān)系、困難幫扶以及對(duì)監(jiān)督考察的質(zhì)量進(jìn)行評(píng)估。第三部分,以兩個(gè)市級(jí)檢察機(jī)關(guān)和三個(gè)基層檢察機(jī)關(guān)制定的附條件不起訴制度的實(shí)施細(xì)則為研究對(duì)象展開,并對(duì)比了國外有關(guān)做法,總結(jié)了當(dāng)前我國附條件不起訴監(jiān)督考察制度在司法實(shí)踐中的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與不足。當(dāng)前,我國檢察機(jī)關(guān)積極探索監(jiān)督考察工作,取得了一定的成績,值得肯定。同時(shí),對(duì)附條件不起訴對(duì)象監(jiān)督考察工作還存在一定的問題,如在監(jiān)督考察的形式上,缺乏專門的監(jiān)督考察機(jī)構(gòu)、專業(yè)專職的考察人員,社會(huì)力量參與幫教明顯不足,導(dǎo)致參與監(jiān)督考察的主體之間權(quán)責(zé)不明,多頭管理;在監(jiān)督考察內(nèi)容的設(shè)置上,存在重“懲罰”輕幫扶的傾向,各地檢察機(jī)關(guān)適用的差異較大,一些“法外”內(nèi)容值得警惕;在監(jiān)督考察的結(jié)果上,部分可撤銷條款可操作性不足,缺乏客觀量化的評(píng)估標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來對(duì)附條件不起訴對(duì)象的監(jiān)督考察質(zhì)量進(jìn)行評(píng)估,附條件不起訴制度的社會(huì)效果難以評(píng)判。第四部分,針對(duì)我國附條件不起訴對(duì)象的監(jiān)督考察制度中存在的問題,探求了完善之路徑。首先,應(yīng)當(dāng)根據(jù)實(shí)際情況,選擇監(jiān)督考察模式。檢察機(jī)關(guān)的單獨(dú)執(zhí)行模式中,應(yīng)當(dāng)加快建立具有獨(dú)立編制的未成年人刑事檢察機(jī)構(gòu),強(qiáng)化檢察機(jī)關(guān)執(zhí)行監(jiān)督考察的工作能力;檢察機(jī)關(guān)牽頭模式中,應(yīng)當(dāng)堅(jiān)持檢察機(jī)關(guān)主導(dǎo),并借助社區(qū)矯正、社工、志愿者的力量來幫助檢察機(jī)關(guān)進(jìn)行監(jiān)督考察,建立專門的關(guān)護(hù)幫教基地,對(duì)缺乏幫教條件的外來流動(dòng)人口的監(jiān)督考察。其次,在監(jiān)督考察內(nèi)容的設(shè)置中,要注意個(gè)別處遇與均衡處遇的均衡,法定義務(wù)必須要求履行,個(gè)別針對(duì)性義務(wù)選擇附加。最后,要積極構(gòu)建附條件不起訴對(duì)象監(jiān)督考察的質(zhì)量評(píng)估體系,要按照評(píng)估的一般過程,以守法狀況、社會(huì)適應(yīng)性、心理狀況、道德水平為評(píng)估指標(biāo)體系,介紹了四種評(píng)估方法,來指導(dǎo)監(jiān)督考察主體開展對(duì)附條件不起訴對(duì)象的評(píng)估工作。最后通過這三方面的完善建議,以期促進(jìn)我國附條件不起訴對(duì)象的監(jiān)督考察制度的完善。
[Abstract]:The conditional non prosecution system is the purpose of the juvenile crime and wrong behaviors streaming out from the trial procedure, let the society reflect fault, to correct bad behavior, repair damaged social relations, reflects the modern education punishment and light punishment, the concept of restorative justice. How to attach a non prosecution supervision object study is the key to the correct implementation of the conditional non prosecution. Our conditional non prosecution system is implemented in a relatively short time, the conditional non prosecution investigation system is less research of supervision object, supervision and inspection work in various parts of the development is not balanced. The procuratorial organs in some economically developed areas to carry out special supervision investigation work, such as Beijing and the specialized construction of the specialized research base, to carry out supervision and inspection work of some grass-roots procuratorates of Shanghai through the government purchase of social service form, and more areas Supervision and inspection work has become a mere formality. Dangerous supervision is a correct implementation of conditional non prosecution system guarantee, in order to promote the conditional non prosecution object supervision system of theoretical research and practical development, the author from the following four parts of this system are discussed. The practice cannot do without the guidance of theory, the basic theory of the first the non prosecution supervision system of conditions are discussed. The development of conditional non prosecution order, and combined with the practice at home and abroad of the conditional non prosecution system, defined the concept and characteristics of the conditional non prosecution system, introduces the basic law of our conditional non prosecution supervision system. The second part discusses the basic task of the conditional non prosecution supervision system, supervision and management should include education, treatment, punishment and prevention of crime, repair the corrupted Society Will the relationship, helping the difficulties and assessment of quality supervision and inspection. The third part begins with the detailed rules for the implementation of the conditions attached to formulate two municipal procuratorial organs and three basic non prosecution system as the research object, and compares the relevant foreign practice, summed up the deficiencies in China before and when the conditional non prosecution supervision the investigation system in the judicial practice experience. At present, China's procuratorial organs to actively explore the supervision and inspection work, and achieved certain results, worthy of recognition. At the same time, not to prosecute the object of supervision and investigation work also has some problems on the condition, such as in the supervision and inspection of the form, the lack of supervision and inspection agencies, inspection personnel professional full-time, social forces to participate in education is obviously insufficient, causes between the participants in the supervision and inspection of the unclear responsibilities, bull management; in the contents of supervision and investigation of the set, in heavy punishment " "The difference is helping the tendency of light, the procuratorial organs around the large, some" outside the law "should be vigilant; in the supervision and inspection of the results, some can revoke terms lack of maneuverability, lack of objective and quantitative evaluation standard of the conditional non prosecution object of the supervision and inspection of quality assessment, the conditional non prosecution system it is difficult to judge the social effect. The fourth part, according to the existing supervision of our conditional non prosecution object inspection system, improve the searching path. First of all, should be based on the actual situation, choice of supervision mode. Separate execution mode of procuratorial organs in, should speed up the establishment of the juvenile criminal prosecution institution with independent preparation strengthen the procuratorial organs, supervision and inspection of the implementation of work ability; procuratorial organs leading mode, the procuratorial organs shall adhere to the dominant, and with the help of community correction, social workers and volunteers The power to help the procuratorial organs supervision and inspection, the establishment of special care education base, study on the floating population and the lack of supervision conditions. Secondly, the contents of supervision and investigation setting, should pay attention to special treatment and equilibrium in the balance of legal obligation must fulfill the requirements of the individual, to the obligation to choose additional. Finally, to actively build quality evaluation system of conditional non prosecution supervision and inspection of the object, according to the general process of evaluation, the lawful status, social adaptability, psychological status, moral level evaluation index system, introduces four kinds of evaluation methods, to guide and supervise the investigation of the main development of the conditional non prosecution object evaluation work. Finally, through the three aspects of suggestions in order to perfect our conditional non prosecution object supervision system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:D925.2
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王新堂,原東梅;關(guān)于不起訴的法律問題探討[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期
2 王慧謙;淺議不起訴聽證的架構(gòu)[J];檢察實(shí)踐;2000年01期
3 周軼;在押被不起訴人在不起訴決定宣布后不宜立即釋放[J];檢察實(shí)踐;2000年03期
4 ;如何理解不服不起訴決定的被害人范圍[J];人民檢察;2001年06期
5 尹彥;論刑事不起訴救濟(jì)制度之完善[J];喀什師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期
6 沈春梅;暫緩不起訴不宜推行[J];人民檢察;2003年04期
7 王麗;不起訴聽證制度淺議[J];檢察實(shí)踐;2003年04期
8 王小玲;他被存疑不起訴[J];人民檢察;2004年09期
9 陳光中;;關(guān)于附條件不起訴問題的思考[J];人民檢察;2007年24期
10 楊學(xué)慧;;未成年人犯罪案件適用不起訴的有關(guān)問題探析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2008年10期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前4條
1 趙宏斌;金石;張建春;方靜雯;;附條件不起訴適用實(shí)證研究——以我省附條件不起訴試點(diǎn)工作為研究對(duì)象[A];第八屆國家高級(jí)檢察官論壇論文集:特別程序與檢察監(jiān)督[C];2012年
2 蘇長明;翟延平;;輕微農(nóng)民犯罪附條件不起訴問題探究[A];第八屆國家高級(jí)檢察官論壇論文集:其他[C];2012年
3 胡獻(xiàn)春;;論寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)刑事司法政策與不起訴的銜接[A];中國新時(shí)期思想理論寶庫——第三屆中國杰出管理者年會(huì)成果匯編[C];2007年
4 湯嘯天;;我國應(yīng)當(dāng)建立“和解不起訴”制度[A];中國犯罪學(xué)研究會(huì)第十四屆學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集(下冊(cè))[C];2005年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 本報(bào)實(shí)習(xí)生 李家志;附條件不起訴 流變及其方向選擇[N];人民法院報(bào);2009年
2 本報(bào)記者 王松苗;不起訴決定:要讓各方心服 不妨公開作出[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2000年
3 安徽省蕪湖市人民檢察院 陳廣計(jì);附條件不起訴 內(nèi)外監(jiān)督并行[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2013年
4 河南省鄭州市中原區(qū)人民檢察院 禹?xiàng)?附條件不起訴要建立配套制度[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2013年
5 全國首批檢察業(yè)務(wù)專家 四川省金堂縣檢察院檢察長 黃維智;附條件不起訴工作的實(shí)踐及反思[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2013年
6 北京市東城區(qū)人民檢察院 李文博;建立附條件不起訴被害人異議程序[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2013年
7 石建民;對(duì)不起訴案件的調(diào)研分析[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2014年
8 山東省濟(jì)南市天橋區(qū)人民檢察院 趙新 王曉敬;完善附條件不起訴適用配套措施[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2014年
9 何艷敏;不起訴聽證制度探微[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2001年
10 廖海生;“暫緩不起訴”的性質(zhì)分析[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2002年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 沙坤;刑事不起訴被害人自我救濟(jì)制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2009年
2 金然;我國附條件不起訴考驗(yàn)機(jī)制存在的問題及對(duì)策[D];延邊大學(xué);2015年
3 余其俐;附條件不起訴考察幫教機(jī)制研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2015年
4 陳宗玉;附條件不起訴監(jiān)督考察制度研究[D];江西師范大學(xué);2014年
5 申錢;協(xié)商不起訴模式構(gòu)建研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2009年
6 婁慧玲;我國裁量不起訴之研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年
7 曾琴;不起訴聽證制度研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2009年
8 顧小蒙;存疑不起訴的爭論與完善[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年
9 靳國強(qiáng);幾起附條件不起訴案件的法理分析[D];蘭州大學(xué);2011年
10 陳約丹;論附條件不起訴司法探索與制度構(gòu)建[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年
,本文編號(hào):1522102
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/1522102.html