本文關鍵詞： 不認罪 隔離式量刑 訴訟程序　出處：《中國社會科學院研究生院》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：從我國刑事訴訟法修改的歷程可以看出，我國正在逐步完善抗辯式訴訟程序、從實體正義轉(zhuǎn)向程序正義。在這樣的大背景下，訴訟程序的簡繁分流為合理、并且高效地解決各種類型的案件提供了可能。如有分流，那么不認罪案件的訴訟程序勢必不能和認罪案件混為一談，需要針對不認罪案件的特點進行單獨設計，體現(xiàn)這類案件的復雜性。本文研究的目的就是提出一個專門適用于不認罪案件的訴訟程序。 若想要設計的程序切實可行，必須要注重程序的實效性，若想收到良好的實效，則必須有針對性的構(gòu)造程序，這樣才能真正解決問題。而針對性要建立在全面把握這類案件實踐特點的基礎上，因此必須要走向?qū)嵺`。所以，，我在暑期進行了一個簡單的調(diào)研，收集了一些相關數(shù)據(jù)，從數(shù)據(jù)信息的整合上進一步發(fā)掘出不認罪案件的特點。 了解了這些特點，深度地挖掘問題，正確把脈問診，才能做到對癥下藥。發(fā)現(xiàn)了問題，就要及時努力地去解決，而解決問題必先剖析問題。因此，結(jié)合我國司法實踐，輔以理論分析，我進一步論證了在我國對不認罪案件單獨構(gòu)建程序的必要性與可行性，為程序的提出做好理論鋪墊。 解決問題必須全面、徹底。單純地構(gòu)思程序、設計程序并不難，但關鍵是如何使這一程序契合我國司法實踐、使外國先進的制度溶入到我國法治的血液當中，真正做到洋為中用、不落窠臼，就需要結(jié)合我國法治國情、充分考慮各種可能出現(xiàn)的情況，需要進行周密的設計、詳細的論證�？紤]到刑事訴訟注重各階段的銜接性，我將從偵查階段開始，一直到審判完成，對各個階段進行程序設計，以保障這一程序系統(tǒng)、全面。為了增強這一程序在我國的普適性，除了制度本身，我還充分考慮到可能需要的一些配套制度，作為補充完善。 終于，我在實證研究基礎上，通過借鑒相關學者的各種資料，進行吸收、消化、創(chuàng)新，形成了自己的觀點。本文的亮點如下：首先，相對于認罪案件而言，對于訴訟分流的另一個大方向——不認罪類案件進行研究，選題具有一定的實際意義。其次，本文采用實證研究的方法，深入基層，獲取了第一手資料，依靠數(shù)據(jù)進行論證，真實可靠。再次，在論文最后我提出了四個配套制度，數(shù)量雖不多，但其中的雙方出庭制度、重新認罪制度是自己思考總結(jié)所得。
[Abstract]:From the course of the revision of our criminal procedure law, we can see that our country is gradually perfecting the adversarial litigation procedure, from substantive justice to procedural justice. And the efficient resolution of various types of cases offers the possibility. If there is a diversion, the proceedings in the case of not pleading guilty are bound not to be confused with the case of confession, and need to be separately designed for the characteristics of the case of not pleading guilty. The purpose of this paper is to put forward a procedure that is suitable for pleading guilty cases. If you want to design a program that is feasible, you must pay attention to the effectiveness of the program, if you want to receive good results, you must have a targeted construction program, This is the only way to really solve the problem. And pertinence should be based on a comprehensive understanding of the practical characteristics of such cases, so we must go to practice. So, I conducted a simple survey during the summer and collected some relevant data. From the integration of data information further explore the characteristics of non-guilty cases. Only when we understand these characteristics, dig the problems in depth, and correctly examine the pulse, can we get the right remedy for the case. When we find a problem, we must try our best to solve it in a timely manner, and we must first analyze the problem. Therefore, in combination with our country's judicial practice, In addition to the theoretical analysis, I further demonstrate the necessity and feasibility of constructing a separate procedure for pleading not guilty cases in our country, and pave the way for the presentation of the procedure. The solution to the problem must be comprehensive and thorough. It is not difficult to design a program simply. But the key is how to fit this procedure with the judicial practice of our country, and how to integrate advanced foreign systems into the blood of our country's rule of law. In order to truly use foreign goods as China and not to be stereotyped, it is necessary to fully consider all kinds of possible situations in the light of the national conditions of the rule of law in our country, and to carry out careful design and detailed argumentations, taking into account the fact that criminal proceedings pay attention to the convergence of various stages, From the investigation stage to the completion of the trial, I will design the procedures for each stage in order to guarantee this procedural system, comprehensive... In order to enhance the universality of this procedure in our country, except the system itself, I also fully take into account the possible need for some supporting system, as a supplement to improve. Finally, on the basis of empirical research, I absorb, digest, innovate and form my own viewpoint by drawing on various materials from relevant scholars. The highlights of this paper are as follows: first, compared with the case of confession, It is of certain practical significance to study the non-guilty cases, another major direction of the diversion of litigation. Secondly, this paper adopts the method of empirical research to go deep into the grassroots, obtain first-hand information, and rely on data for demonstration. Thirdly, at the end of the paper, I put forward four supporting systems, although the number is not much, but the two parties appear in court system, replete guilty system is their own thinking summary.
【學位授予單位】：中國社會科學院研究生院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 冀祥德;張文秀;;從對抗轉(zhuǎn)向合作:中國控辯關系新發(fā)展[J];中國司法;2011年12期

2 陳衛(wèi)東;;論隔離式量刑程序改革——基于蕪湖模式的分析[J];法學家;2010年02期

3 王敏遠;;論我國刑事證據(jù)法的轉(zhuǎn)變[J];法學家;2012年03期

4 姚莉;認罪后的訴訟程序——簡易程序與辯訴交易的協(xié)調(diào)與適用[J];法學;2002年12期

5 王敏遠;;死刑案件的證明“標準”及《刑事訴訟法》的修改[J];法學;2008年07期

6 余劍;;被告人不認罪案件量刑程序模式選擇與程序展開[J];法學;2010年11期

7 陳衛(wèi)東;;量刑程序改革的一個瓶頸問題[J];法制資訊;2009年05期

8 竺常峗;;刑事訴訟嚴格證明與自由證明規(guī)則的構(gòu)建[J];華東政法大學學報;2009年04期

9 汪貽飛;;論量刑聽證程序的價值與功能——以美國法為范例的考察[J];時代法學;2010年01期

10 汪建成;;量刑程序改革中需要轉(zhuǎn)變的幾個觀念[J];中國檢察官;2010年09期

本文編號：1505578