本文關鍵詞： 行政訴訟受案范圍 訴訟功能模式 主觀公權利 客觀法秩序　出處：《東方法學》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：盡管新《行政訴訟法》一定程度上擴大了行政訴訟的受案范圍,但是,本次修改明顯帶有"權宜之計"的嫌疑,缺乏深層次的理論基礎,也必然帶來司法實踐中如何明確行政訴訟受案范圍的困惑。因此,以主觀公權利與客觀法秩序為兩條基本路徑探討行政訴訟受案范圍的基本邏輯,具有理論與現(xiàn)實基礎。在主觀公權利救濟模式下,一個行政行為是否納入行政訴訟受案范圍主要取決于一個最基本的邏輯,司法審查與被訴的行政行為之間的實質(zhì)上的關聯(lián)程度。在客觀法秩序模式下,行政訴訟受案范圍的基本邏輯,就是假定一切行政行為可以接受司法審查為原則,其最大化的結(jié)果就是被訴的行政行為與起訴人是否有利害關系無關,對行政行為是否遵守所有與行政行為相關的法律規(guī)范進行完全的司法審查。我國《行政訴訟法》應當立法明確雙層結(jié)構(gòu)的受案范圍標準,假定行政行為可以審查標準,立法排除司法審查的例外范圍。
[Abstract]:Although the new Administrative Litigation Law has to a certain extent expanded the scope of accepting cases in administrative litigation, this revision obviously has the suspicion of "expedient measures" and lacks a deep theoretical basis. It will inevitably lead to the confusion of how to clarify the scope of administrative litigation cases in judicial practice. Therefore, this paper discusses the basic logic of the scope of administrative litigation cases in two basic ways: subjective public rights and objective legal order. It has theoretical and practical foundation. Under the mode of subjective relief of public rights, whether an administrative act is included in the scope of administrative litigation mainly depends on a basic logic. In the mode of objective law order, the basic logic of the scope of administrative proceedings is to assume that all administrative acts can be subject to judicial review as the principle. The result of its maximization is that there is no relation between the administrative action and the interest of the prosecutor. Whether the administrative act is in compliance with all the legal norms related to the administrative act is subject to complete judicial review. Our country's Administrative procedure Law should legislate to clarify the standard of accepting the case of the two-tier structure. Assuming that administrative acts can be reviewed, legislation excludes the scope of exceptions to judicial review.
【作者單位】： 華東理工大學法學院;
【分類號】：D925.3
【正文快照】： 2014年迎來了我國《行政訴訟法》的首次修改,意欲擴大行政訴訟受案范圍。新修改的《行政訴訟法》在受案范圍上,主要在體現(xiàn)在三個方面:一是廢棄了“具體行政行為”的概念,確立了以“行政行為”為受案范圍的基準。二是通過列舉方式增加了或者修改了人民法院的受案范圍。例如,新

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 侯繼虎;;客觀法秩序維護模式:行政訴訟受案范圍擴大的理論基礎及其制度建構(gòu)[J];政治與法律;2011年12期

，

本文編號：1489059