本文關(guān)鍵詞： 激情犯罪 減輕責任 禮法兼治 量刑情節(jié)　出處：《遼寧大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：激情犯罪的界定在學術(shù)界一直并未給出明確統(tǒng)一的解釋。多數(shù)派觀點認為，所謂激情犯罪是指人在激情狀態(tài)下發(fā)生的殺人、傷人、毀物等暴力性犯罪行為。激情是一種爆發(fā)性的、短暫的、比較猛烈的情緒狀態(tài)如狂喜、振奮、憤怒、恐懼、絕望等，可分為積極和消極的兩種。行為人在激情狀態(tài)下對于“激情”的處理方式往往會選擇最直接、最極端的暴力方式，故行為人造成的后果也是較為嚴重的，，但行為人在激情狀態(tài)爆發(fā)時的控制力和辨認力相較其他類型的犯罪行為人，其反社會性較弱。而且在其實行完犯罪后，其情緒會趨于平靜且陷入極度后悔狀態(tài)。激情犯罪的社會危險性誠然是不容忽視的，但激情犯罪的成因卻也是對激情犯罪進行評價的重要因素，激情犯罪的成因也影響對激情犯罪的定罪量刑。各國刑法都對激情犯罪持一種比較寬容的態(tài)度，在處罰上往往輕于同種罪質(zhì)的一般故意犯罪。我國刑事立法與實踐上也體現(xiàn)出相同的態(tài)度，但我國刑法對激情犯罪并未作出明文規(guī)定，立法缺失導致法官判案沒有統(tǒng)一標準、法官自由裁量權(quán)過大等問題。由此可看出激情犯罪的定罪量刑問題我國是有立法價值的。 本文主要對激情犯罪量刑情節(jié)法定化問題進行研究討論，借由實際案例出發(fā)，第一部分先討論激情犯罪的概念以及激情犯罪的特點，繼而分析激情犯罪應(yīng)承擔刑事責任程度以及激情犯罪應(yīng)承擔減輕責任的理論依據(jù)，關(guān)于激情犯罪行為人應(yīng)承擔減輕責任的依據(jù)，試從犯罪心理學理論、刑事責任理論以及互動關(guān)系與被害人過錯理論對此進行說明。第二部分則對我國實踐中對于激情犯罪的處置情況進行分析，由于我國對激情犯罪未給出明文規(guī)定，實踐中易出現(xiàn)法官自由裁量權(quán)的濫用、法律適用缺乏統(tǒng)一的標準從而引發(fā)司法公正還有激情犯罪同其他犯罪的混淆。第三部分是通過激情犯罪域內(nèi)外立法的分析以此作為對我國激情犯罪立法的借鑒，各國對激情犯罪情節(jié)法定化方式、激情犯罪情節(jié)適用范圍等都有其特殊的規(guī)定，本文以美國、英國、德國為例，分析激情犯罪的域外立法。最后筆者將結(jié)合我國刑事立法現(xiàn)狀，從激情犯罪法定化方式、激情犯罪情節(jié)適用范圍以及激情因素的范圍及激憤程度的判斷標準對我國激情犯罪量刑情節(jié)法定化提出立法建議。
[Abstract]:The definition of passion crime has not been given a clear and unified explanation in academic circles. According to the majority view, the so-called passion crime refers to the killing and wounding of people in the state of passion. Violent crimes such as destruction. Passion is an explosive, transient, violent emotional state such as ecstasy, exhilaration, anger, fear, despair, etc. It can be divided into two kinds: positive and negative. The actors often choose the most direct and extreme ways to deal with "passion" in the state of passion, so the consequences caused by the perpetrator are more serious. However, the actors in the state of passion when the outbreak of control and recognition of the force of other types of perpetrators, its anti-social is weaker, and after its implementation of the crime. Its emotions tend to calm and fall into a state of extreme regret. The social danger of passion crime can not be ignored, but the cause of passion crime is also an important factor in the evaluation of passion crime. The cause of the crime of passion also affects the conviction and sentencing of the crime of passion. All countries have a more tolerant attitude to the crime of passion in criminal law. Our criminal legislation and practice also reflect the same attitude, but our criminal law does not make explicit provisions on passion crime. The lack of legislation leads to the lack of a unified standard for judges to adjudicate cases and the excessive discretion of judges. From this we can see that the conviction and sentencing of crimes of passion is of legislative value in our country. This article mainly studies and discusses the legalization of sentencing circumstances of passion crime. Based on actual cases, the first part discusses the concept of passion crime and the characteristics of passion crime. Then it analyzes the degree of criminal responsibility and the theoretical basis of reducing responsibility for the crime of passion. On the basis that the perpetrator of passion crime should bear the responsibility of lightening the responsibility, try from the theory of criminal psychology. The theory of criminal liability and the theory of interaction and victim fault explain this. The second part is the analysis of the disposition of passion crime in our practice. Because our country does not give the explicit stipulation to the passion crime, the judge discretion abuse is easy to appear in the practice. The lack of uniform standards in the application of the law leads to the confusion of judicial justice and passion crime with other crimes. The third part is the analysis of legislation inside and outside the field of passion crime as a reference to the legislation of passion crime in our country. Various countries have their own special provisions on the ways of legalizing the circumstances of passion crimes and the applicable scope of the circumstances of passion crimes. This article takes the United States, Britain and Germany as examples. Finally, the author will combine the present situation of our country's criminal legislation, from the passion crime legalization way. The scope of application of passion crime, the scope of passion factor and the judging standard of intensity of indignation put forward legislative suggestions on the legalization of sentencing circumstances of passion crime in our country.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.13;D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳航;對激情犯罪立法的比較研究[J];法學評論;1995年06期

2 陳和華;;激情犯罪不宜從輕處罰的心理學依據(jù)——從“藥家鑫殺人案”導入[J];法學;2011年05期

3 張西林;;淺談激情犯罪的成因及其對策[J];法制與社會;2009年07期

4 江仁寶;激情犯罪的特點與防治[J];青少年犯罪問題;2003年04期

5 武雁萍;;試論“激情犯罪”[J];中國公共安全(學術(shù)版);2007年02期

6 胡學相;許承余;;激情犯從寬處罰的應(yīng)然與實然論證[J];貴州社會科學;2012年12期

7 周振杰;;激情犯的基礎(chǔ)理論與立法問題研究[J];河北法學;2006年07期

8 宋術(shù);;論激情犯罪的成因與對策[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2007年05期

9 張麗佳;;激情犯罪若干問題研究[J];理論界;2006年07期

10 沈惠章,周桂琴;激情犯罪的特點及其預防[J];公安論壇;1997年04期

本文編號：1488804