本文關(guān)鍵詞： 證明妨礙行為 規(guī)制措施 證據(jù)收集 證明責(zé)任　出處：《寧波大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在民事訴訟中,證明妨礙行為作為一種非誠(chéng)信、非正義的行為,它對(duì)案件事實(shí)、當(dāng)事人訴訟權(quán)利和裁判公正都構(gòu)成了重大威脅。不管是從民事訴訟理論還是司法實(shí)踐,各國(guó)都致力于設(shè)置法律規(guī)制措施來(lái)掃除其給訴訟證明活動(dòng)所帶來(lái)的障礙,從而發(fā)現(xiàn)案件真實(shí),救濟(jì)當(dāng)事人受損的權(quán)利。本文從我國(guó)規(guī)制證明妨礙行為的現(xiàn)狀入手,結(jié)合兩大法系的有關(guān)規(guī)定,歸納與比較分析了證明妨礙行為規(guī)制的理論基礎(chǔ)、規(guī)制措施及配套制度,最后落腳于完善我國(guó)證明妨礙的規(guī)制。全文分為四個(gè)部分:文章第一部分是對(duì)我國(guó)規(guī)制證明妨礙行為的現(xiàn)狀分析,從現(xiàn)有規(guī)定與司法狀況兩個(gè)方面切入。首先對(duì)我國(guó)的立法規(guī)定作了梳理;其次,采用實(shí)證法學(xué)的研究方法,結(jié)合相關(guān)案例,分析說(shuō)明訴訟實(shí)務(wù)中證明妨礙行為的規(guī)制情況;最后,通過(guò)立法與司法的比較分析,歸納出存在的問(wèn)題。文章第二部分從理論層面剖析規(guī)制證明妨礙行為的原因。首先,介紹兩大法系相關(guān)的學(xué)說(shuō);其次,分析了我國(guó)規(guī)制證明妨礙行為的理論基礎(chǔ),主要從比較法的視角,分析兩大法系的學(xué)說(shuō)分歧及存在的原因,進(jìn)而確定我國(guó)規(guī)制證明妨礙行為的理論依據(jù)。文章第三部分考察并分析證明妨礙行為的規(guī)制措施及配套機(jī)制。同樣采用比較法的研究方法,先考察兩大法系民事訴訟對(duì)證明妨礙行為規(guī)制措施與配套機(jī)制的規(guī)定,再進(jìn)一步歸納分析兩種方式的不同之處,最后確定我國(guó)對(duì)證明妨礙行為規(guī)制措施與配套機(jī)制的路徑選擇。文章第四部分是結(jié)合我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段所存在的問(wèn)題,為我國(guó)完善證明妨礙行為規(guī)制提出建議。采用制度本身與配套制度并進(jìn)的思路,一方面明確妨礙行為的范圍,以一般性規(guī)定與具體法律效果相結(jié)合,豐富具體的規(guī)制措施;另一方面,完善相關(guān)的配套制度,擴(kuò)充當(dāng)事人收集證據(jù)的方法,確保資訊的對(duì)等性,以防御證明妨礙行為。
[Abstract]:In civil proceedings, proof of obstruction acts as a kind of dishonest, unjust behavior, it on the facts of the case. Both the litigant's right of action and the justice of the judge constitute a major threat. Whether from the theory of civil action or judicial practice, all countries are committed to setting up legal regulation measures to remove the obstacles to the litigation proof activities. In order to find that the case is true, relief the rights of the injured parties. This article starts with the current situation of proof of obstruction in our country, combined with the relevant provisions of the two major legal systems. Induces and compares the theory foundation, the regulation measure and the supporting system of the proof hindrance behavior regulation. The last part is to perfect the regulation of proof hindrance in our country. The full text is divided into four parts: the first part of the article is the analysis of the current situation of the regulation of proof hindrance in our country. From the existing provisions and the judicial situation in two aspects. First of all, the legislative provisions of our country have been combed; Secondly, using the research method of positivism, combined with the relevant cases, this paper analyzes and explains the regulation of proof obstruction in litigation practice. Finally, through the comparative analysis of legislation and judicature, the existing problems are summed up. The second part of the article analyzes the reasons of the regulation and proof of obstruction from the theoretical level. First, introduces the relevant theories of the two major legal systems; Secondly, it analyzes the theoretical basis of the regulatory obstruction behavior in China, mainly from the perspective of comparative law, analyzes the differences between the two legal systems and the reasons for their existence. Then determine the theoretical basis of the proof of obstruction in China. The third part of the article examines and analyzes the regulatory measures and supporting mechanisms of proof of obstruction. The same method of comparative study is used. First of all, the civil litigation of the two major legal systems of the provisions of regulatory measures and supporting mechanisms of proof obstruction, and then further summarized and analyzed the differences between the two ways. Finally, the article determines the path choice of the regulatory measures and supporting mechanisms of proof hindrance behavior in China. Part 4th is based on the existing problems at the present stage of our country. In order to improve the regulation of proof hindrance behavior in our country, we should adopt the train of thought of system itself and supporting system, on the one hand, make clear the scope of obstructing behavior, and combine the general provisions with the concrete legal effect. Enrich the specific regulatory measures; On the other hand, we should perfect the relevant supporting system, expand the method of collecting evidence, ensure the reciprocity of information, and defend against proof hindering behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條

1 張友好;;論證明妨礙法律效果之擇定——以文書(shū)提出妨礙為例[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2010年05期

2 田海鑫;劉建勛;;證明妨礙的理論基礎(chǔ)及適用——基于一則案例的思考[J];河北科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年02期

3 趙信會(huì);Ma Jing;;民事證明妨礙推定的法理及適用條件（英文）[J];China Legal Science;2014年01期

4 奚瑋;余茂玉;;論民事訴訟中的證明妨礙[J];河北法學(xué);2007年03期

5 朱思思;;論民事證明妨礙的程序性規(guī)制[J];廣州市公安管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

6 李代華;;論我國(guó)民事訴訟中的證明妨礙[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年30期

7 張曉霞;;論民事訴訟中的證明妨礙[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年S1期

8 李伯安;;證明妨礙制裁的正當(dāng)性與制度建構(gòu)[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

9 包冰鋒;;多元化適用:證明妨礙法律效果的選擇路徑[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2011年05期

10 崔麗;汲長(zhǎng)彪;;民事證明妨礙制度的構(gòu)建[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年02期

中國(guó)重要會(huì)議論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前2條

1 石珍;;跨越私法與公法的楚河漢界——民事證明妨害理論在行政法域中之司法續(xù)造與規(guī)范重塑[A];全國(guó)法院第25屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募汗痉ㄅc行政法實(shí)施問(wèn)題研究（下冊(cè)）[C];2013年

2 吳獻(xiàn)雅;;勞動(dòng)爭(zhēng)議訴訟中的證明妨礙問(wèn)題研究——兼評(píng)《勞動(dòng)爭(zhēng)議司法解釋(三)》相關(guān)規(guī)定[A];建設(shè)公平正義社會(huì)與刑事法律適用問(wèn)題研究-全國(guó)法院第24屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募ㄉ蟽?cè)）[C];2012年

中國(guó)重要報(bào)紙全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前2條

1 上海市閔行區(qū)人民法院 劉鋒;證明妨礙排除制度之司法適用[N];人民法院報(bào);2008年

2 江蘇省蘇州市相城區(qū)人民法院 王剛;證明妨礙的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及其排除規(guī)則探析[N];人民法院報(bào);2011年

中國(guó)碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條

1 朱軼;證明妨礙制度探析[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

2 楊青仙;證明妨礙制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

3 張紀(jì)紅;論證明妨礙行為的構(gòu)成及其法律后果[D];蘇州大學(xué);2012年

4 金新貴;論證明妨礙理論在醫(yī)療損害賠償訴訟中的適用[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

5 李君;論民事訴訟中的證明妨礙[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2015年

6 陳姿穎;民事訴訟之證明妨礙制度研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2010年

7 樊艷霞;論證明妨礙制度[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

8 孫麗華;關(guān)于民事訴訟中證明妨礙的研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2008年

9 產(chǎn)兵華;完善我國(guó)民事訴訟中證明妨礙制度之探究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2011年

10 張彬;論證明妨礙在醫(yī)療訴訟中的適用[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1486413