發(fā)布時間：2018-02-02 22:05

  本文關鍵詞： 民事再審程序 再審證據(jù)結構 主要證據(jù) 新證據(jù)　出處：《內(nèi)蒙古大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：我國《民事訴訟法》在2007年修改時,對申請再審證據(jù)和檢察院抗訴證據(jù)方面的規(guī)定進行了細化,及至2012年《民事訴訟法》修改時,在2007年變動的基礎上對申請再審證據(jù)和檢察院抗訴證據(jù)進行了微調(diào),這樣改造后的民事訴訟再審證據(jù)必然成為民事再審程序中濃墨重彩的一筆,由于再審程序是我國民事制度中的一種糾錯程序,因此在再審中對證據(jù)的把握與運用就顯得尤為重要。 民事訴訟再審證據(jù)主要涉及新證據(jù)和主要證據(jù),對于新證據(jù)理論界一直爭議頗多,但是對主要證據(jù)的認識與把握則筆墨較少。主要證據(jù)是原審認定案件事實的基本證據(jù),與新證據(jù)相較,在立法上對于主要證據(jù)的把握以及司法實務中明確的證明標準的界定都未能明言,對于主要證據(jù)與新證據(jù)的進一步把握有助于緩解法院再審案件積壓的重擔,節(jié)約司法資源,進而維護司法裁判的權威。因此,對再審主要證據(jù)和新證據(jù)這一再審證據(jù)結構的認識與把握勢在必行。 本文分四部分對再審證據(jù)結構進行論述： 第一部分,本部分通過對再審證據(jù)的基本理論的研究,了解再審證據(jù)與再審程序運行的關系,再通過與原審證據(jù)在涉及法律關系、法律規(guī)制的不同之處,闡釋我國民事訴訟再審證據(jù)的構成。 第二部分,借鑒域外國家在再審證據(jù)結構方面的有益經(jīng)驗,通過比較分析大陸法系和英美法系有關再審證據(jù)結構適用上的區(qū)別,為把握我國民事再審證據(jù)結構奠定基礎。 第三部分,總結概括我國民事訴訟學術界、民事訴訟立法以及司法解釋中有關我國民事訴訟再審證據(jù)構成的理論觀點和相關規(guī)定,指明在民事訴訟再審證據(jù)結構方面需要厘清的理論問題和民事訴訟立法以及司法解釋中需要把握的內(nèi)容,為下一部分我國民事訴訟再審證據(jù)的把握與運用壘實基礎。 第四部分是本文的核心,重點在于把握與運用我國民事訴訟再審運行過程中有關“主要證據(jù)”如何認定、關涉“基本事實”的證據(jù)、民事再審證據(jù)應達到的證明標準、因一方當事人提出新的證據(jù)引起民事再審造成對方當事人損失的補償規(guī)定程序、對民事當事人因客觀原因不能自行收集的證據(jù)規(guī)定的“客觀原因”在立法上進行界定,在動態(tài)證據(jù)觀理念指導下,把握界定民事再審證據(jù)結構應考量的具體因素,以民事訴訟司法實踐推動再審證據(jù)結構理論的深入研究,對我國民事訴訟再審證據(jù)結構在實踐中的適用具有積極意義。
[Abstract]:When the Civil procedure Law of our country was amended in 2007, the provisions on the application for retrial evidence and the procuratorate's protest evidence were refined, until 2012 when the Civil procedure Law was amended. On the basis of the changes in 2007, the application for retrial evidence and the procuratorate protest evidence were fine-tuned, so that the retrial evidence after the transformation of civil proceedings is bound to become a strong point in the civil retrial procedure. Since the retrial procedure is a kind of error correction procedure in our civil system, it is particularly important to grasp and apply the evidence in the retrial. Civil retrial evidence mainly involves new evidence and main evidence, for the new evidence theorists have been a lot of controversy. But the understanding and grasp of the main evidence is less. The main evidence is the basic evidence of the facts of the case in the original trial, compared with the new evidence. In legislation, the grasp of the main evidence and the clear definition of the standard of proof in judicial practice can not be clearly stated, and the further grasp of the main evidence and the new evidence will help to alleviate the heavy burden of the backlog of court retrial cases. Therefore, it is imperative to understand and grasp the structure of retrial main evidence and new evidence. This paper discusses the structure of retrial evidence in four parts: The first part, through the research of the basic theory of retrial evidence, understand the relationship between retrial evidence and the operation of retrial procedure, and then through the original trial evidence in relation to the legal relationship, legal regulation differences. Explain the constitution of retrial evidence in civil litigation in our country. The second part, draw lessons from the beneficial experience of foreign countries in the retrial evidence structure, through comparative analysis of civil law system and Anglo-American law system about the differences in the application of retrial evidence structure. In order to grasp the structure of civil retrial evidence in China lay the foundation. The third part summarizes the academic circles of civil litigation, civil litigation legislation and judicial interpretation of the composition of civil litigation retrial evidence in China's theoretical views and relevant provisions. It also points out the theoretical problems that need to be clarified and the contents to be grasped in the legislation of civil proceedings and the judicial interpretation in the aspect of the evidence structure of civil retrial. For the next part of our country's civil action retrial evidence grasp and use solid foundation. Part 4th is the core of this paper, which focuses on grasping and using the evidence of "main evidence" and "basic facts" in the operation of civil litigation retrial in our country. Civil retrial evidence should meet the standard of proof, because one of the parties to the new evidence caused by the civil retrial of the other party damage compensation procedures. Under the guidance of the concept of dynamic evidence view, the definition of "objective reasons" stipulated by the evidence that the civil parties cannot collect on their own for objective reasons is carried out in legislation. Grasp the specific factors that should be considered in defining the structure of civil retrial evidence, and promote the further study of the theory of retrial evidence structure with the judicial practice of civil litigation. It has positive significance to the application of the evidence structure of civil action retrial in our country in practice.
【學位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 趙敏;王俊;孫海峰;;對民事再審新證據(jù)的整體解讀[J];東方法學;2011年02期

2 羅飛云;;民事再審新證據(jù)的認定與運用[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2011年05期

3 李后龍;花玉軍;葛文;;關于對再審新證據(jù)認知的調(diào)研報告[J];法律適用;2010年Z1期

4 何利;;破解民事再審新證據(jù)認定之困境 以“證明負擔動態(tài)論”為路徑[J];法律適用;2011年06期

5 林文學;劉小飛;;論我國民事再審審查制度的完善[J];法律適用;2011年07期

6 李浩;;構建再審之訴的三個程序設計[J];法商研究;2006年04期

7 林鳳臨;;論民事再審的啟動主體[J];法制與社會;2009年05期

8 董少謀;;“新的證據(jù)”主觀要件作為再審事由的再認識[J];公民與法(法學版);2010年07期

9 陳杭平;;芻議本次民事訴訟法修改[J];公民與法(法學版);2012年09期

10 侯惠珍;;完善我國民事再審程序的理性思考[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年07期

，

本文編號：1485585