發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-01 04:56

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 刑事錯(cuò)案 刑事審判監(jiān)督程序 完善　出處：《四川省社會(huì)科學(xué)院》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在刑事訴訟中，審判監(jiān)督程序雖然只是一種特殊程序，它做為刑事訴訟中的一種救濟(jì)機(jī)制，不具有普通程序的普遍適用性。但是，在長(zhǎng)期的司法實(shí)踐中，刑事審判監(jiān)督程序?qū)τ诩m正司法錯(cuò)誤起到了獨(dú)到的作用。因此，刑事審判監(jiān)督程序在刑事訴訟的制度體系中占有重要地位。 近些年來(lái)，屢有重大刑事錯(cuò)案被媒體披露，有些刑事錯(cuò)案甚至十?dāng)?shù)年未得到糾正，而一些重大錯(cuò)案的糾正竟是依賴于真兇的出現(xiàn)或死者的復(fù)活，而并非通過(guò)正常途徑的刑事審判監(jiān)督程序獲得，如浙江蕭山五青年殺害出租汽車司機(jī)案，多年后真兇出現(xiàn)；遼寧黑山劉凱利殺害少女案，一個(gè)叫劉鐵軍的死刑犯臨刑前在遺書中說(shuō)明此案是自己所為，17年后，劉凱利由原先被判死緩改判無(wú)罪等等，一個(gè)個(gè)重大刑事錯(cuò)案，雖然發(fā)生率不高，但因長(zhǎng)期得不到糾正，，當(dāng)事人被嚴(yán)重錯(cuò)判甚至錯(cuò)殺，導(dǎo)致社會(huì)影響惡劣，這一切，使刑事審判監(jiān)督程序飽受詬病。 人們認(rèn)為，重大錯(cuò)案、冤案得不到及時(shí)有效的糾正，對(duì)當(dāng)事人、對(duì)司法公正和社會(huì)正義都將造成嚴(yán)重傷害。盡管刑事錯(cuò)案的發(fā)生在任何社會(huì)、任何國(guó)家都難以避免。但如何對(duì)待刑事錯(cuò)案是考量一個(gè)國(guó)家法治發(fā)展水平的重要因素。對(duì)此，我們不能以“一事不再理原則和既判力理論”，阻礙刑事錯(cuò)案的發(fā)現(xiàn)和糾正。當(dāng)然，盡管刑事錯(cuò)案的發(fā)生極大地削弱了人們對(duì)司法公正的信心，但從另一個(gè)角度看，卻也為改革司法體制提供了憑證和機(jī)會(huì)。我們可以從刑事錯(cuò)案中尋找推動(dòng)司法改革的現(xiàn)實(shí)方法。 作為刑事訴訟法中的刑事審判監(jiān)督程序又稱刑事再審程序，是對(duì)已生效裁判的重新審查及審理，對(duì)審判機(jī)關(guān)業(yè)已作出的錯(cuò)誤裁決進(jìn)行糾正，以達(dá)到保障公民的合法權(quán)益、實(shí)現(xiàn)司法的最終公正的目的。刑事再審程序的有效執(zhí)行將在對(duì)司法機(jī)關(guān)形象和權(quán)威的維護(hù)，增強(qiáng)人民群眾對(duì)國(guó)家司法機(jī)關(guān)的信任，以及全社會(huì)對(duì)法律的尊重等方面起到非常重要的作用。但目前，在我國(guó)的司法實(shí)踐中仍存在著諸多問(wèn)題,影響了刑事審判監(jiān)督功能正常、有效的發(fā)揮。 本文正是因近期披露的一系列刑事錯(cuò)案引發(fā)的司法思考，借鑒國(guó)外刑事再審制度的理念和做法，根據(jù)我國(guó)社會(huì)的司法理念、實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)等，剖析我國(guó)刑事審判監(jiān)督程序中存在的問(wèn)題，并從刑事申訴、再審啟動(dòng)、再審事由、再審機(jī)構(gòu)等多方面提出完善我國(guó)刑事審判監(jiān)督程序的對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:In criminal proceedings, the trial supervision procedures, although it is only a special program, it is a kind of relief mechanism in criminal litigation, does not have the universal applicability of the ordinary procedure. However, in the long-term judicial practice, criminal trial supervision procedure to a unique role to correct the judicial error. Therefore, important the status of the system of criminal trial supervision procedure in criminal proceedings.
In recent years, frequently a major criminal misjudged case was disclosed by the media, some criminal misjudged cases or even more than a decade has been corrected, and some misjudged cases correct actually appear to depend on the murderer or the resurrection of the dead, but not in the normal way of criminal trial supervision procedure, such as the Zhejiang Xiaoshan five young taxi driver killed the murderer case. After years of Liaoning Montenegro; Liu Kaili murdered girl case, Liu Tiejun called a death row before his death in a suicide note that in the case of their own, after 17 years, from the original Liu Kaili pipansihuan commuted innocence and so on, a major Criminal Misjudged case, although the incidence is not high, but because of the long-term not correct the party was a big mistake, even wrong to kill, cause social adverse effects, all of this, the criminal trial supervision procedure criticized.
People think that misjudged cases are not timely and effective, unjust case correction, the parties, the judicial justice and social justice will cause serious injury. Despite the occurrence of criminal crime in any society, it is difficult for any country to avoid. But how to deal with the Criminal Misjudged Case is an important factor of a national development level of the rule by law. In this regard, we cannot use the "idem principle and the theory of res judicata, hinder the Criminal Misjudged Case found and corrected. Of course, despite greatly misjudged criminal cases weakened people's confidence in the administration of justice, but from another point of view, but also provides vouchers and opportunities for the reform of the judicial system. You can find a realistic approach to promoting judicial reform from the Criminal Misjudged Case.
As the criminal procedure law in the criminal trial supervision procedure and criminal retrial procedure, is to re examination and hearing the effective judgment, judicial organs have made the wrong decision to correct, in order to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, realize justice eventually. The purpose of the effective implementation of the criminal retrial procedure in maintenance the image and authority of the judiciary, the judicial organs of the state to enhance people's trust, plays a very important role in the whole society and respect for the law and so on. But at present, in the judicial practice of our country there are still many problems, affecting the function of criminal trial supervision, effectively.
This is caused by a series of judicial consideration of Criminal Misjudged Cases recently disclosed, referring to the criminal retrial system of foreign ideas and practices, according to China's social justice concept, practical experience, analyzes the existing problems in the criminal trial supervision procedure, and from the criminal appeal, retrial, retrial, retrial mechanism etc. many aspects put forward countermeasures and suggestions of perfecting the criminal trial supervision procedure.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川省社會(huì)科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳學(xué)權(quán);刑事錯(cuò)案的三重標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年04期

2 王建中;;刑事審判監(jiān)督問(wèn)題初探[J];河北法學(xué);2010年02期

3 楊玉俊,胡春健;刑事審判監(jiān)督制度之完善[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

4 王敏遠(yuǎn);;刑事訴訟法學(xué)研究的轉(zhuǎn)型——以刑事再審問(wèn)題為例的分析[J];法學(xué)研究;2011年05期

5 沈德詠;江顯和;;刑事再審制度改革的理性思考——以一事不再理原則為視角[J];人民司法;2006年05期

6 黃士元,屈廣清;中德刑事再審制度之比較[J];法學(xué)論壇;2001年04期

7 陳瑞華;刑事再審程序研究[J];政法論壇;2000年06期

8 謝佑平,萬(wàn)毅;一事不再理原則重述[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2001年03期

9 錢云燦;;刑事審判監(jiān)督法律體系架構(gòu)芻議[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2011年01期

10 向澤選;;刑事審判監(jiān)督的制度缺陷與完善[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

本文編號(hào)：1480986