本文關(guān)鍵詞： 個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛 訴訟解決機制 民刑并行 電子訴訟　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：伴隨著個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸行業(yè)在監(jiān)管、誠信體系缺失的環(huán)境中迅猛發(fā)展,與互聯(lián)網(wǎng)深度融合的個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛數(shù)量急劇增長并大量進入訴訟。這一方面成為阻礙行業(yè)發(fā)展、影響社會穩(wěn)定的重要因素,另一方面則基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)化特點給訴訟程序帶來挑戰(zhàn)。有鑒于此,對于個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛訴訟解決的研究具有理論和實踐的雙重意義。本文主要分為五部分:第一部分,闡述了當(dāng)前個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛的基本特征。當(dāng)前個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛呈現(xiàn)出信息媒介的網(wǎng)絡(luò)化、法律關(guān)系的復(fù)雜化、數(shù)量的快速增長性、發(fā)生的群體性、化解依據(jù)的漸趨完善性等特征。信息媒介的網(wǎng)絡(luò)化是個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛較傳統(tǒng)群體性糾紛最為顯著的特點。第二部分,就個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛進行類型化分析。基于糾紛發(fā)生原因?qū)�體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛劃分為借款人逾期型糾紛、平臺違規(guī)欺詐型糾紛、平臺系統(tǒng)故障型糾紛。三者在發(fā)生規(guī)模、爭議復(fù)雜程度、涉案人數(shù)、社會影響等方面也有較大差異�；趥鶛�(quán)追索主體將個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛劃分為自行追索型糾紛和轉(zhuǎn)移追索型糾紛。兩類糾紛在訴訟當(dāng)事人數(shù)量以及專業(yè)能力等方面有較大差別。第三部分,分析了個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛訴訟解決過程中存在的問題。訴訟周期過長、群體性壓力化解不力、非訴程序難以發(fā)揮效用、在線解決機制落后是當(dāng)前個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛訴訟解決過程中存在的主要問題。第四部分,從價值主體出發(fā)確立個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛訴訟解決的應(yīng)然價值目標(biāo)——妥當(dāng)解決,兼顧全局。其中妥當(dāng)解決是內(nèi)部價值目標(biāo),強調(diào)個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛訴訟解決中法院的高效審理與當(dāng)事人的低訴訟負(fù)擔(dān);兼顧全局是外部價值目標(biāo),強調(diào)個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛訴訟解決對于社會秩序的維護以及對于行業(yè)治理的引導(dǎo)。第五部分,提出針對個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛特點的訴訟機制調(diào)整對策。健全個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛訴訟解決機制應(yīng)明確網(wǎng)貸平臺所在地可作為爭議實際聯(lián)系地、基于"民刑并行、民刑共存"協(xié)調(diào)民刑交叉案件審理程序、喚醒代表人訴訟程序、允許出借人與網(wǎng)貸平臺之間的任意訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)、充分發(fā)揮兩個非訴程序效用、健全電子訴訟機制。
[Abstract]:With the individual network lending industry in the regulatory, integrity system in the absence of the environment of rapid development. The number of individual online loan disputes that are deeply integrated with the Internet has increased sharply and entered litigation in a large number. This has become an important factor hindering the development of the industry and affecting social stability on the one hand. On the other hand, based on the characteristics of the network, it brings challenges to the proceedings. The study of individual online loan dispute resolution has both theoretical and practical significance. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part. This paper expounds the basic characteristics of the current individual online loan disputes. The current individual online lending disputes present the network of information media, the complexity of legal relations, the rapid growth of the number, and the occurrence of the group. The network of information media is the most prominent characteristic of individual network loan dispute than traditional group dispute. Part two. Based on the causes of the disputes, the individual online lending disputes are divided into overdue disputes for borrowers and fraudulent disputes for platform violations. Platform system malfunction dispute. Three in the scale, dispute complexity, involved in the number of people. Based on the subject of creditor's claim, the individual internet loan dispute is divided into self-recourse dispute and transfer recourse dispute. The number of litigant parties and the professional ability of the two types of disputes are also different. The third part is the third part. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the process of litigation settlement of individual network loan disputes. The litigation cycle is too long, the group pressure is not resolved effectively, and the non-litigation procedure is difficult to play its role. The backwardness of online resolution mechanism is the main problem in the process of individual online loan dispute litigation. 4th part. From the point of view of the value subject, it is necessary to establish the proper solution to the individual network loan dispute litigation, and to take into account the overall situation. Among them, the proper solution is the internal value goal. It emphasizes the efficient trial of the court and the low burden of the litigant in the settlement of the individual network loan dispute. Taking into account the overall situation is the external value goal, emphasizing the individual network loan dispute litigation for the maintenance of social order and the guidance of industry governance. Part 5th. The author puts forward some countermeasures to adjust the litigation mechanism for the characteristics of individual network loan disputes. To perfect the individual network loan dispute litigation resolution mechanism, it should be clear that the location of the online loan platform can be used as the actual contact place of disputes, based on the "civil and criminal law parallel". The coexistence of civil and criminal law "coordinates the trial procedure of civil and criminal cross cases, awakes the representative litigation procedure, allows the arbitrary litigation between the lender and the network loan platform, gives full play to the utility of the two non-litigation procedures, and perfects the electronic litigation mechanism."
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賈懷東;走出"非市場經(jīng)濟"困局[J];中外企業(yè)家;2004年09期

2 陳愛武;消費糾紛訴訟解決的困境及出路[J];江蘇商論;2005年09期

3 唐澤義;李乃燕;陳偉;;關(guān)閉信用社過程中的貸款糾紛訴訟案件探析[J];廣西金融研究;2005年12期

4 李琪;李波;;我國消費糾紛訴訟的完善[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2010年SB期

5 ;關(guān)于建立保險糾紛訴訟與調(diào)解對接工作試點的通知[J];中國保險;2013年01期

6 曲偉霞 ,王家中;謹(jǐn)防濫用撫育費糾紛訴訟權(quán)[J];農(nóng)民致富之友;2004年11期

7 忻力;新昌縣法律顧問處舉辦經(jīng)濟合同糾紛訴訟講座[J];法學(xué);1982年12期

8 侯麗艷;對我國環(huán)境糾紛訴訟制度的幾點思考[J];社會科學(xué)論壇;2003年05期

9 何紅梅;商業(yè)銀行借貸糾紛訴訟的法律風(fēng)險及防范[J];福建金融;2004年02期

10 于靜濤;;論農(nóng)村糾紛訴訟的研究維度[J];福建行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年03期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 劉淵;王麗;;一起車禍引發(fā)的輸血糾紛案例分析[A];中國輸血協(xié)會第四屆輸血大會論文集[C];2006年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前6條

1 記者 高嵩;探索科學(xué)的保險糾紛訴訟調(diào)解模式[N];中國保險報;2012年

2 記者 袁有瑋 通訊員 李衛(wèi);西寧啟動保險糾紛訴訟與調(diào)解對接機制[N];人民法院報;2013年

3 記者 楊濟澤 通訊員 季銳 譚健民;前七個月房產(chǎn)糾紛訴訟增多[N];連云港日報;2007年

4 記者　蔣勇　通訊員　嚴(yán)文淵　張杰　;余姚消費法庭成立兩年辦案近百件[N];浙江日報;2005年

5 ;關(guān)于期貨代理糾紛訴訟的幾點認(rèn)識[N];期貨日報;2003年

6 劉輝文;消費糾紛訴訟費用如何計算[N];法制日報;2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 秦立鑫;個體網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸糾紛訴訟解決機制論[D];山東大學(xué);2017年

2 朱敏;群體糾紛訴訟制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

3 武繼權(quán);我國教育民事糾紛訴訟調(diào)解必經(jīng)程序研究[D];重慶師范大學(xué);2008年

4 石朝晶;民事與行政關(guān)聯(lián)糾紛訴訟探析[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

5 蘇光;清代中葉婦女財產(chǎn)糾紛訴訟案研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1461133