本文關(guān)鍵詞： 司法改革 檢察職權(quán) 法律監(jiān)督 檢察職權(quán)配置 完善　出處：《淮北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：檢察職權(quán)配置是司法職權(quán)配置的重要內(nèi)容,也是司法改革的重要環(huán)節(jié)。檢察職權(quán)的有效運(yùn)行,很大程度上決定著我國司法體制的建立、健全與完善。然而檢察職權(quán)實(shí)際運(yùn)作過程中受到多方干擾,導(dǎo)致檢察職權(quán)不能有效行使。目前,我國檢察職權(quán)配置存在諸多問題,主要有內(nèi)部和外部兩方面因素影響檢察職權(quán)配置的優(yōu)化,文章將檢察機(jī)關(guān)定性為法律監(jiān)督機(jī)關(guān),基于此,筆者以司法改革為視角,剖析檢察職權(quán)配置中存在的法律問題和配置不足。通過完善立法、改革檢察體制、優(yōu)化職能范圍、提升檢察機(jī)關(guān)司法權(quán)威及公信力等相關(guān)措施,優(yōu)化檢察職權(quán)配置,防止權(quán)力濫用。本文分為六個部分:第一章:通過論述檢察權(quán)的性質(zhì)是司法權(quán),檢察制度是由人類發(fā)展而來為背景。我國從清末檢察制度的引進(jìn)到司法改革中檢察職權(quán)配置,我國檢察職權(quán)存在的配置缺陷,一直是法學(xué)理論界研究的課題。結(jié)合國內(nèi)外關(guān)于檢察職權(quán)配置研究現(xiàn)狀,試圖系統(tǒng)分析出我國檢察職權(quán)配置缺陷,探尋司法改革的良方。第二章:理論分析檢察職權(quán)的法理基礎(chǔ)是受到西方權(quán)力制約理論的影響,保障法律的統(tǒng)一適用和促進(jìn)司法公正同時作為檢察職權(quán)配置的法理基礎(chǔ),為檢察職權(quán)設(shè)置與改革提供理論支持。憲法性文件對檢察職權(quán)配置的定位、訴訟法的分散規(guī)定,以及檢察院組織法的細(xì)化,都對檢察職權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)做了自上而下的規(guī)定。第三章:論述司法改革視角下我國檢察職權(quán)配置存在的法律問題,從外部權(quán)力干涉檢察職權(quán)配置和內(nèi)部權(quán)力配置缺陷兩大方面出發(fā)分析原因,強(qiáng)調(diào)加快檢察職權(quán)配置的完善,以提高我國司法公正性。第四章:論述在司法改革視角下優(yōu)化檢察職權(quán)配置的建議宜從完善憲法出發(fā),修改完善相關(guān)法律規(guī)范,保障檢察職權(quán)配置的合理性。同時改革完善檢察體制、優(yōu)化檢察職權(quán)職能范圍以及提升檢察機(jī)關(guān)司法權(quán)威及公信力。第五章:鑒于檢察職權(quán)配置是為提高司法公正,然而檢察機(jī)關(guān)作為法律監(jiān)督機(jī)關(guān)享有監(jiān)督其他機(jī)關(guān)的權(quán)力,但是監(jiān)督檢察職權(quán)配置過程的機(jī)制應(yīng)不斷完善。本章為擴(kuò)大司法公開范圍、開放新媒體監(jiān)督平臺、強(qiáng)化紀(jì)檢部門監(jiān)督權(quán)三個方面探尋檢察職權(quán)濫用的監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制。第六部分:結(jié)語。
[Abstract]:The allocation of procuratorial power is an important part of judicial power allocation and also an important link of judicial reform. The effective operation of procuratorial power determines to a great extent the establishment of judicial system in our country. Perfect and perfect. However, there are many interference in the actual operation of procuratorial power, leading to the procuratorial power can not be effectively exercised. At present, there are many problems in the allocation of procuratorial power in China. There are two main internal and external factors affecting the optimization of procuratorial power allocation, the article will determine the procuratorial organ as a legal supervision organ, based on this, the author takes judicial reform as the perspective. Through perfecting the legislation, reforming the procuratorial system, optimizing the scope of functions, improving the judicial authority and credibility of procuratorial organs and other relevant measures. This paper is divided into six parts: the first chapter: by discussing the nature of procuratorial power is judicial power. The procuratorial system comes from the human development background. From the introduction of the procuratorial system in the late Qing Dynasty to the judicial reform, the allocation of procuratorial power in China is flawed. It has always been a research topic in the field of legal theory. Combined with the present situation of the domestic and foreign research on the allocation of procuratorial powers, this paper tries to systematically analyze the defects of the allocation of procuratorial powers in China. The second chapter: theoretical analysis of procuratorial powers of the legal basis is affected by the western theory of power constraints. Guarantee the unified application of the law and promote judicial justice as the legal basis for the allocation of procuratorial powers, and provide theoretical support for the establishment and reform of procuratorial powers. The decentralized provisions of the procedure law and the refinement of the law on the organization of the Public Prosecutor's Office. The third chapter discusses the legal problems existing in the disposition of procuratorial power in China from the perspective of judicial reform. From the external power interference procuratorial power allocation and internal power allocation defects from two major aspects of the analysis of reasons, emphasizing on speeding up the improvement of procuratorial power allocation. In order to improve the judicial fairness of our country. Chapter 4th: to discuss how to optimize the disposition of procuratorial powers from the perspective of judicial reform, from the point of view of improving the constitution, to modify and perfect the relevant legal norms. At the same time, we should reform and perfect the procuratorial system. Optimize the scope of procuratorial functions and enhance the judicial authority and credibility of procuratorial organs. Chapter 5th: since the allocation of procuratorial powers is to improve judicial justice. However, the procuratorial organ, as a legal supervision organ, has the power to supervise other organs, but the mechanism of supervising the disposition of procuratorial power should be improved continuously. This chapter is to expand the scope of judicial publicity and open the new media supervision platform. Strengthen the supervision power of discipline inspection departments from three aspects to explore the supervision and restriction mechanism of the abuse of procuratorial power. Part 6th: conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：淮北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D926.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張智輝;;檢察改革要以檢察職權(quán)優(yōu)化配置為核心[J];河南社會科學(xué);2011年03期

2 徐漢明;;我國檢察職權(quán)優(yōu)化配置的路徑選擇[J];人民檢察;2010年03期

3 熊霞;;淺議檢察職權(quán)配置的要求及實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑[J];甘肅警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

4 趙開年;;論刑事檢察職權(quán)之規(guī)訓(xùn):以內(nèi)部監(jiān)督制約為視角[J];中國刑事法雜志;2010年09期

5 向澤選;;檢察規(guī)律引領(lǐng)下的檢察職權(quán)優(yōu)化配置[J];政法論壇;2011年02期

6 施慶堂;;檢察職權(quán)之變遷與展望[J];海峽法學(xué);2010年03期

7 張朝霞;溫軍;賈曉文;;論檢察職權(quán)內(nèi)部配置的基礎(chǔ)與路徑[J];政法論壇;2009年01期

8 羅欣;晏磊;;案件集約管理:檢察職權(quán)優(yōu)化配置路徑選擇[J];人民檢察;2011年24期

9 尚愛國;;試論我國檢察職權(quán)的合理配置與完善[J];中國檢察官;2009年07期

10 買買提·玉素甫;;接受人大監(jiān)督 履行檢察職權(quán)——在自治區(qū)黨委人大工作會議上的發(fā)言[J];新疆人大;2002年01期

相關(guān)會議論文 前3條

1 熊霞;;檢察職權(quán)科學(xué)配置研究——以特定重大犯罪案件檢察職權(quán)的立法完善為視角[A];第五屆國家高級檢察官論壇論文集[C];2009年

2 熊霞;;論檢察職權(quán)配置的三個要求及其實(shí)現(xiàn)[A];第五屆國家高級檢察官論壇論文集[C];2009年

3 李凱俊;李濤;;關(guān)于修改人民檢察院組織法第五條檢察職權(quán)的思考[A];第七屆國家高級檢察官論壇會議文章[C];2011年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前5條

1 山東省膠州市檢察院檢察長 牟永和;影響檢察職權(quán)配置的三個因素[N];檢察日報(bào);2008年

2 李桂珍 記者 王吟;天柱縣檢察院“五主動、五禁止”為非公經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展護(hù)航[N];貴州政協(xié)報(bào);2010年

3 人民檢察博物館副館長 國家檢察官學(xué)院井岡山分院副院長 劉志成;人民檢察職權(quán)的歷史演進(jìn)[N];檢察日報(bào);2011年

4 王洪錄 記者 任小昌;蒼溪檢察官作出十二條廉政承諾[N];廣元日報(bào);2008年

5 記者　裴智勇;保管鑒定費(fèi)用不得向當(dāng)事人收取[N];人民日報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 劉俊;我國檢察職權(quán)配置研究[D];淮北師范大學(xué);2017年

2 解思思;我國檢察職權(quán)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2013年

3 黃紅梅;從檢察權(quán)的性質(zhì)看檢察職權(quán)的完善[D];蘇州大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1460348