本文關鍵詞： 刑事卷證 技術審判 口證　出處：《北方法學》2016年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：從證據(jù)手段在審判中的運用來看,以卷證為基礎的歐陸主要法治國家的刑事審判可以界定為一種技術審判,而英美以口證為主要手段的刑事審判大致屬于一種經(jīng)驗審判。我國普遍運用卷證的刑事審判也可歸為一種技術審判方式,但由于對卷證的過度依賴、司法者職業(yè)化和專業(yè)化程度不高和刑事卷證運用的程序性制約機制的欠缺,導致我國技術審判的異化。當下推行的以審判為中心的訴訟制度改革并非是對刑事卷證運用的根本否定,相反,為我國刑事卷證在審判中運用的制度改革奠定了基礎。
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the application of evidence means in the trial, the criminal trial in the main rule of law countries in Europe based on the volume of evidence can be defined as a kind of technical trial. The criminal trial with oral evidence as the main means in the United States and the United States generally belongs to one kind of experience trial. The criminal trial which is widely used in our country can also be classified as a kind of technical trial method, but due to excessive dependence on the documentary evidence. The professionalization and specialization of the judiciary is not high and the procedural restriction mechanism of the application of criminal documents is lacking. Leading to the alienation of technical trial in China. The current judicial litigation system reform is not a fundamental negation of the application of criminal documents, on the contrary. It lays a foundation for the system reform of the application of criminal document in the trial in our country.
【作者單位】： 云南大學法學院;
【基金】：作者主持的國家社科基金重點項目“技術審判原理下的刑事卷證本體與制度研究”(項目編號13AFX013) 教育部人文社科規(guī)劃項目“法院案件管理機制實證研究——以刑事審判為中心”(項目編號12YJA820050)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D925.2
【正文快照】： 刑事卷證是以文字為載體、以卷宗(證據(jù)卷)為形式所形成的證據(jù)材料。在我國,它包括公安檢察機關在偵查和起訴階段針對犯罪嫌疑人、被害人、證人的陳述所制作的訊問(詢問)筆錄,實施偵查措施或行為過程的筆錄,采集鑒定人的鑒定意見、調(diào)查過程收集的各類原始書證等系統(tǒng)化的書面證，

本文編號：1454254