本文關(guān)鍵詞：我國附條件不起訴制度的立法完善　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 附條件不起訴 公訴裁量權(quán) 條件

【摘要】：近些年來,我國經(jīng)濟(jì)快速發(fā)展,社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)發(fā)生巨大變化,政治經(jīng)濟(jì)文化轉(zhuǎn)型,舊的社會(huì)關(guān)系被打破,新的社會(huì)規(guī)范還未建立,社會(huì)矛盾沖突加劇,犯罪率也不斷上升。除此之外,新型犯罪、有組織犯罪、惡勢力犯罪越來越多,打擊和預(yù)防犯罪的任務(wù)艱巨。面對(duì)急劇上升的刑事案件,嚴(yán)格按照傳統(tǒng)的起訴模式難以適應(yīng)社會(huì)的需要。于是司法機(jī)關(guān)就在司法實(shí)踐中不斷探索創(chuàng)新更適合中國實(shí)際的司法方式或者途徑,并將一些較為成熟的方式上升為法律。2012年《刑事訴訟法》修改,附條件不起訴制度寫入我國刑事訴訟法。確立的附條件不起訴制度,這也是2012年新刑訴的一大亮點(diǎn)。眾所周知,程序法的目的不是宣示,而是適用,附條件不起訴制度入法兩年多以來,在現(xiàn)實(shí)的司法實(shí)踐中,適用在制度的案件卻并不多,這樣的現(xiàn)實(shí)讓我們不得不思考附條件不起訴的價(jià)值。起初在試點(diǎn)過程中,設(shè)立附條件不起訴制度目的在于通過擴(kuò)大檢察人員不起訴裁量權(quán),實(shí)現(xiàn)案件分流,減少進(jìn)入審判階段的案件數(shù)量,減輕司法壓力,同時(shí)也為了未成年犯罪嫌疑人能更好的回歸社會(huì)。在實(shí)踐初期,該制度確實(shí)取得了較好的法律效果和社會(huì)效果,但作為一項(xiàng)普遍制度在全國推廣之后,卻遭受冷遇。這說明我國的附條件不起訴制度在由于制度設(shè)計(jì)過于匆忙,制度設(shè)計(jì)還不夠合理科學(xué),配套制度還不夠完善,還有眾多方面有待完善。我國附條件不起訴制度是未成年犯罪領(lǐng)域的一小步嘗試,在實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)各種各樣的問題是難免的,附條件不起訴制度還需要不斷地改進(jìn)和完善,才能發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的作用。本文從我國附條件不起訴制度的法律規(guī)定出發(fā),參照對(duì)比國外相關(guān)制度建設(shè)經(jīng)驗(yàn),重新審視我國附條件不起訴制度在立法方面存在的缺陷與不足,本文立足我國國情,提出切實(shí)可行的立法完善建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, China's rapid economic development, social structure has undergone tremendous changes, political, economic and cultural transformation, old social relations have been broken, new social norms have not been established, social conflicts intensified. In addition, new types of crime, organized crime, evil forces are committing more and more crimes, and the task of cracking down and preventing crime is arduous. In the face of a sharp rise in criminal cases. Strict accordance with the traditional mode of prosecution is difficult to adapt to the needs of society, so the judicial organs in judicial practice constantly explore innovative more suitable for the actual Chinese judicial methods or ways. In 2012, the Criminal procedure Law was amended and the conditional non-prosecution system was written into the Criminal procedure Law of our country. This is also a bright spot of the new criminal suit in 2012. As we all know, the purpose of the procedural law is not to declare, but to apply, the conditional non-prosecution system into the law for more than two years, in the reality of judicial practice. There are not many cases that apply to the system, so we have to think about the value of conditional non-prosecution. At first, in the pilot process. The purpose of setting up the system of conditional non-prosecution is to reduce the number of cases entering the trial stage and reduce the judicial pressure by expanding the discretion of procuratorial personnel not to prosecute, realize the diversion of cases and reduce the number of cases entering the trial stage. At the same time, in order to the juvenile suspects can return to society better. In the initial stage of practice, the system did achieve better legal and social effects, but as a universal system in the country after the promotion. This shows that the system of conditional non-prosecution in our country is too hastily designed, the system design is not reasonable and scientific, and the supporting system is not perfect enough. There are many aspects to be improved. The system of conditional non-prosecution is a small attempt in the field of juvenile crime, and it is inevitable to have a variety of problems in practice. Conditional non-prosecution system also needs to be continuously improved and improved in order to play its due role. This paper reexamines the defects and shortcomings of the system of conditional and non-prosecution in our country, and puts forward some feasible suggestions on how to perfect the legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 彭少杰;;對(duì)附條件不起訴制度的思考[J];長春大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

2 劉柱;;新刑訴法下的附條件不起訴制度研究[J];山西警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

3 王德勝;黎曉露;資曉露;;附條件不起訴對(duì)象的考察與管理[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年11期

，

本文編號(hào)：1375012