本文關(guān)鍵詞：論認定財產(chǎn)無主程序　出處：《西南政法大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 認定財產(chǎn)無主程序 非訟程序 基本原則 規(guī)則設(shè)置

【摘要】：作為我國非訟程序的一種,認定財產(chǎn)無主程序?qū)τ跓o主財產(chǎn)權(quán)屬關(guān)系的重構(gòu)與恢復有著重大的意義。然而,司法實踐中對其應(yīng)用相對較少,且在適用的過程中該程序本身也存在著諸多問題,以至于對物權(quán)關(guān)系的應(yīng)有作用很難展現(xiàn)出來。之所以有此種法律適用上的困難,立法規(guī)則的粗陋是根源,主要包括:法律規(guī)定中概念的模糊、法律規(guī)則的籠統(tǒng)、與實體法中相關(guān)程序的銜接不明確,與實體法中相關(guān)規(guī)定有沖突。正是因為認定財產(chǎn)無主程序在司法實踐中暴露出了這些問題,使得該程序如今的處境比較尷尬。再加上長期重實體、輕程序的慣性思維,一些學者甚至認為該程序完全可以從民事訴訟法中刪掉。筆者在分析一些認定財產(chǎn)無主程序的案例中暴露出的問題的基礎(chǔ)上,對該程序的缺陷進行盡可能全面的解剖,并且以方便實現(xiàn)該程序“物盡其用”的價值為目的,就怎樣設(shè)置能使認定財產(chǎn)無主程序更科學、更合理提出筆者自己的建議。在文章的構(gòu)思上,第一部分是對認定財產(chǎn)無主程序的詳細概述。首先對認定財產(chǎn)無主程序的含義和條件進行闡述。其次,對其審理程序進行論述。其中分三個小部分,分別為:認定財產(chǎn)無主的啟動程序;審查請求和發(fā)出公告;案件的判決。最后,是認定財產(chǎn)無主案件的救濟程序。第二部分為認定財產(chǎn)無主的實例剖析。這一部分首先列舉上海、山東、北京的三個認定財產(chǎn)無主的案件,并分別分析這三個案例中反映出的認定財產(chǎn)無主程序中的一些問題。然后對其進行深入、全面的分析認定財產(chǎn)無主程序存在的缺陷:法律規(guī)則籠統(tǒng);法律概念的模糊;與實體法中相關(guān)程序銜接不明確;與實體法中的相關(guān)規(guī)定不統(tǒng)一等等。第三部分是對規(guī)范與完善現(xiàn)行認定財產(chǎn)無主程序的設(shè)想。其一,了解認定財產(chǎn)無主程序的原理;其二,基于第二部分的缺陷分析,提出規(guī)范與完善認定財產(chǎn)無主程序的構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:As a kind of noncontentious procedure, determining the property without the main program for the reconstruction of main property relationships is of great significance and recovery. However, in judicial practice, the application is relatively small, and in the application process of the program itself also has many problems, and should have effect on the relationship of property right it is difficult to show. This is the law applicable difficulty, legislative rules humble is the root, mainly including: the law of fuzzy concepts, general rules, procedures and cohesion in the substantive law is not clear, there is a conflict with relevant substantive law provisions. It is because the determination of ownerless property procedure in judicial practice exposed to these problems, the program makes the situation now embarrassing. Coupled with the long-term heavy entity light procedure, the inertia of thinking, some scholars even think that the program can completely from the civil litigation Delete the litigation law. Based on analysis of some exposed the author finds no property of the main program in the case of problems and defects of the program will make a comprehensive anatomy, and to facilitate the implementation of the program "best" value for the purpose of how to identify the property without setting can make the main program more scientific more reasonable, I put forward my own suggestions. In the design, the first part is a detailed overview of the main program without determining the property. The meaning and conditions of the main program without first determining the property described. Secondly, this paper elaborates on its trial procedure. Which is divided into three small parts, respectively: the property has been determined the main starting procedure; review request and issued a notice; the decision in the case. Finally, is the determination of ownerless property case relief program. The second part is the case analysis of determination of ownerless property. This part of the first list of Shanghai, Shandong, Three Beijing finds the property without the main case, and analysis finds the property reflects the three cases without some of the problems in the main program. Then its in-depth, comprehensive analysis finds no property defect programs exist: the rule of law in general; fuzzy concept of law; substantive law and related the program interface is not clear; not unified with the relevant provisions of substantive law and so on. The third part is to regulate imagination and improve the main program. The current determination of property, understand the principle of determining the property without the main program; second, defect analysis based on the second part of the proposed, standardize and improve the concept of property without the main program that.

【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 章武生;;非訟程序的反思與重構(gòu)[J];中國法學;2011年03期

2 夏旭麗;李華武;;認定財產(chǎn)無主程序與相關(guān)程序銜接關(guān)系之初探——從“認定財產(chǎn)無主程序”與“遺失物招領(lǐng)程序”的沖突說起[J];凱里學院學報;2010年01期

3 冀宗儒;;當事人主義、職權(quán)主義與合作主義——民事訴訟立法指導思想的發(fā)展[J];公民與法(法學版);2009年12期

4 張禮洪;;汶川地震后無主物的認定和歸屬[J];中州學刊;2008年05期

5 湯維建;王鴻雁;;我國非訟程序的立法問題及解決建議[J];廣東行政學院學報;2008年01期

6 陳葦;高偉;;我國內(nèi)地無人承受遺產(chǎn)制度之重構(gòu)——以中國內(nèi)地與港、澳、臺地區(qū)立法比較為視角[J];學術(shù)交流;2008年01期

7 廖中洪;;制定單行《民事非訟程序法》的建議與思考[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2007年03期

8 馬登科;民事特別程序基本問題比較研究[J];求索;2004年12期

9 譚啟平,蔣拯;遺失物制度研究[J];法學研究;2004年04期

10 蔡虹;非訟程序的理論思考與立法完善[J];華中科技大學學報(社會科學版);2004年03期

，

本文編號：1367199