關于有限責任公司股東資格確認的案例分析
發(fā)布時間：2019-06-27 16:34
【摘要】：近年來,隨著有限責任公司股東資格確認糾紛的增多,如何合理解決該類公司股東資格的具體認定已成為理論界和實務界日益關注的問題。由于現(xiàn)行立法缺乏對股東資格的清晰界定,最高人民法院也未出臺統(tǒng)一股東資格認定標準的司法解釋,司法實踐中法院各自為判,標準極不統(tǒng)一,一定程度損害了司法的權威。司法實務中面對此類糾紛,需要先厘清股東資格認定的指導原則,正確認識公司章程、股東名冊、出資證明書、公司登記、出資行為、享有股東權利等證據對股東資格的證明效力,然后區(qū)分公司內部糾紛和外部糾紛,依循民法的私法自治原則和商法的外觀主義原則,探求當事方的合意,保護善意第三方的利益,根據相關的表面證據和實質證據,公平合理地確認股東資格。在采信證據過程中,特別要注意根據案情正確認定公司登記的效力。應該認為公司登記對公司外的善意第三方具有昭示股東身份的公示力,即善意第三方基于對公司登記的信賴與被其記載的股東交易,即使該記載與事實不符,也不能因此使其交易歸于無效；但在僅涉及公司內部糾紛的法律關系中,公司登記并不能因其官方文件的屬性而被賦予創(chuàng)設股東資格的法效。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increase of disputes over the confirmation of shareholder qualification of limited liability companies, how to reasonably solve the specific identification of shareholder qualification of this kind of company has become a growing concern in the theoretical and practical circles. Due to the lack of a clear definition of shareholder qualification in the current legislation, the Supreme people's Court has not issued a unified judicial interpretation of the criteria for the identification of shareholder qualification. In judicial practice, the courts are judged by each other, and the standards are very different, which damages the judicial authority to a certain extent. In the face of such disputes in judicial practice, it is necessary to clarify the guiding principles of shareholder qualification identification, correctly understand the proof effect of evidence such as articles of association, shareholder register, capital contribution certificate, company registration, capital contribution behavior and enjoyment of shareholders' rights to shareholder qualification, and then internal disputes and external disputes of district branches, in accordance with the principle of private law autonomy of civil law and the externalism principle of commercial law, to explore the agreement of the parties. Protect the interests of bona fide third parties and confirm shareholder qualifications fairly and reasonably on the basis of relevant prima facie and substantive evidence. In the process of accepting evidence, special attention should be paid to the correct identification of the effectiveness of company registration on the basis of the case. It should be considered that the company registration has the public indication power to the bona fide third party outside the company, that is, based on the trust in the company registration and the shareholder transaction recorded by the company, the company registration can not invalidate the transaction even if the record is inconsistent with the facts. However, in the legal relationship involving only the internal disputes of the company, the company registration can not be given the legal effect of creating shareholder qualification because of the attribute of its official documents.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91
本文編號：2506969
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increase of disputes over the confirmation of shareholder qualification of limited liability companies, how to reasonably solve the specific identification of shareholder qualification of this kind of company has become a growing concern in the theoretical and practical circles. Due to the lack of a clear definition of shareholder qualification in the current legislation, the Supreme people's Court has not issued a unified judicial interpretation of the criteria for the identification of shareholder qualification. In judicial practice, the courts are judged by each other, and the standards are very different, which damages the judicial authority to a certain extent. In the face of such disputes in judicial practice, it is necessary to clarify the guiding principles of shareholder qualification identification, correctly understand the proof effect of evidence such as articles of association, shareholder register, capital contribution certificate, company registration, capital contribution behavior and enjoyment of shareholders' rights to shareholder qualification, and then internal disputes and external disputes of district branches, in accordance with the principle of private law autonomy of civil law and the externalism principle of commercial law, to explore the agreement of the parties. Protect the interests of bona fide third parties and confirm shareholder qualifications fairly and reasonably on the basis of relevant prima facie and substantive evidence. In the process of accepting evidence, special attention should be paid to the correct identification of the effectiveness of company registration on the basis of the case. It should be considered that the company registration has the public indication power to the bona fide third party outside the company, that is, based on the trust in the company registration and the shareholder transaction recorded by the company, the company registration can not invalidate the transaction even if the record is inconsistent with the facts. However, in the legal relationship involving only the internal disputes of the company, the company registration can not be given the legal effect of creating shareholder qualification because of the attribute of its official documents.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前7條
1 張振杰;;公司股東出資問題分析[J];法制與經濟(下半月);2008年05期
2 王嬙;;公司章程與股東資格的確認[J];法治研究;2008年05期
3 申蕾;;有限責任公司股東資格的認定應采用形式標準[J];今日南國(理論創(chuàng)新版);2009年01期
4 侯東德;;股東權的契約配置及基本框架[J];金融與經濟;2008年08期
5 傅穹;;法定資本制:詮釋、問題、檢討——從公司不同參與人的利益沖突與衡量觀察[J];南京大學法律評論;2002年01期
6 王東敏;王憲森;;《關于適用公司法若干問題的規(guī)定(一)》的理解與適用[J];人民司法;2006年06期
7 吳頡;熊平;;從自我履約協(xié)議看股東權益保護[J];特區(qū)經濟;2007年12期
，本文編號：2506969
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/sflw/2506969.html
