【摘要】： 對“體育”一詞的界定是探討體育法的概念和范圍的前提和基礎(chǔ)。目前在體育學(xué)界,對體育一詞的界定并沒有一個準確的答案,存在著各種不同的觀念,我們應(yīng)接受體育即“sport”的觀念,并且應(yīng)在對體育作廣義的理解,即體育不僅包括身體教育,還包括競技體育與大眾體育。在法學(xué)視野下界定體育這一概念亦存在著不同的模式。我國現(xiàn)行的《中華人民共和國體育法》也沒有對體育下一個嚴格的定義,我們認為只有部分體育行為才能進入體育法的視野。法律視野下的體育外延應(yīng)小于廣義的體育概念的外延。體育法是存在的,而且已經(jīng)是一個獨立的法律領(lǐng)域,這有大量的證據(jù)可以證明,據(jù)此,體育法是國家對體育進行管制的法律規(guī)則(如英國的制止足球流氓立法,我國的反興奮劑立法)和由體育運動的當(dāng)事人(包括體育行會)自己創(chuàng)造的用以調(diào)整他們彼此之間的體育關(guān)系的規(guī)則的總稱。前一類規(guī)則具有公力強制性的特點,而后一類規(guī)則具有自治性、專業(yè)性、以及非公力強制性的特點。 體育法具有自己的特征,第一是多元性,表現(xiàn)為體育法淵源的多元性和效力來源的多元性。第二是國際性,體育的國際性決定了體育法所具有的國際性,國際體育法正在形成。第三是技術(shù)性,體育作為一項專門性活動,它的技術(shù)性特征決定了體育法的技術(shù)性。體育法有自己獨特的研究范圍,國內(nèi)體育法教材對體育法范圍的界定各不相同,但基本上圍繞《中華人民共和國體育法》對體育所做的分類而進行論述。所發(fā)表的論文研究范圍比較廣泛,但不成體系,存在著大量的薄弱環(huán)節(jié)。在國外,對體育法范圍的界定一般比較寬泛,在美國、英國、加拿大、德國、日本等國,各種不同的體育法書籍討論了廣泛的體育法論題,對構(gòu)建我國的體育法學(xué)體系有重要的啟示。我們認為,體育法的范圍應(yīng)包括體育法基礎(chǔ)理論、體育實體法和體育程序法。體育法基礎(chǔ)理論研究包括對體育法的概念、特征、淵源、范圍、效力等的研究。體育實體法包括體育憲法、體育民商法、體育刑法、體育行政法等,體育程序法包括體育行會內(nèi)部糾紛解決程序、體育調(diào)解、興奮劑檢測程序、體育仲裁、體育訴訟等。
[Abstract]:The definition of the word "sports" is the premise and basis for discussing the concept and scope of sports law. At present, in the field of sports, there is no accurate answer to the definition of the term sports, and there are various different concepts. We should accept the concept of sports, that is, "sport", and should make a broad understanding of sports. That is, physical education includes not only physical education, but also competitive sports and mass sports. There are also different models to define the concept of sports from the perspective of law. There is no strict definition of sports in the current Sports Law of the people's Republic of China. We think that only part of the sports behavior can enter the vision of sports law. The extension of sports from the perspective of law should be smaller than the extension of the concept of sports in a broad sense. There is plenty of evidence that sports law exists and is already an independent field of law, according to which sports law is the legal rule of the state to regulate sports (such as British legislation against football hooligans). The anti-doping legislation of our country) and the general name of the rules created by the parties to sports (including sports guilds) to adjust their sports relationship with each other. The first kind of rules have the characteristics of public force mandatory, the latter kind of rules have the characteristics of autonomy, professionalism and non-public force mandatory. Sports law has its own characteristics, the first is pluralism, which is manifested in the pluralism of the origin of sports law and the pluralism of the source of effectiveness. The second is international. The internationality of sports determines the internationality of sports law, and international sports law is taking shape. The third is technical, sports as a specialized activity, its technical characteristics determine the technical nature of sports law. Sports law has its own unique research scope. The definition of the scope of sports law in domestic sports law textbooks is different, but it basically revolves around the classification of sports in the Sports Law of the people's Republic of China. The research scope of the published paper is extensive, but it is not systematic, and there are a lot of weak links. In foreign countries, the definition of the scope of sports law is generally relatively broad. In the United States, Britain, Canada, Germany, Japan and other countries, various sports law books discuss a wide range of sports law topics. It has important enlightenment to the construction of sports law system in our country. We think that the scope of sports law should include the basic theory of sports law, sports substantive law and sports procedure law. The research on the basic theory of sports law includes the study of the concept, characteristics, origin, scope and effectiveness of sports law. Sports substantive law includes sports constitution, sports civil and commercial law, sports criminal law, sports administrative law and so on. Sports procedure law includes internal dispute resolution procedure of sports guild, sports mediation, doping testing procedure, sports arbitration, sports litigation and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D922.16

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 秦毅;;對《中華人民共和國體育法》核心價值評析[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年12期

2 秦毅;;對體育法價值定義的探討[J];河北體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年02期

3 韓勇;;中國體育法學(xué)研究:從法解釋學(xué)到法社會學(xué)[J];體育科學(xué);2010年03期

4 呂偉;;一個屋檐下的體育法——體育法方法論的路徑選擇與思考[J];成都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年11期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李先燕;《中華人民共和國體育法》修改的價值取向研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 黃亮;體育法律領(lǐng)域中的“第三類規(guī)則”[D];湘潭大學(xué);2011年

2 趙懷志;臨時組織型體育風(fēng)險致害案件適用風(fēng)險自受原則的反思[D];中國政法大學(xué);2009年

3 宋猛;南京國民政府體育法制研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2012年

4 黃世昌;世界跆拳道聯(lián)盟法律問題研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：2485098