國際私法名稱初探
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-10 19:15
【摘要】： 國際私法的名稱問題是國際私法學(xué)中的一個基本的問題。在解決此問題上要同時注意本土視角和世界視角的研究方法的運用。國際私法范圍是決定國際私法名稱的內(nèi)在的決定性因素。其本體范圍應(yīng)當(dāng)只包括沖突規(guī)范，即法律適用規(guī)范或法律選擇規(guī)范。國際私法也就是決定于何種情形下適用何國法律及如何適用之具體法則。其它的相關(guān)的規(guī)范分屬獨立的國際民事訴訟法、國際商法、國際商事仲裁法等，而非國際私法。在我國，傳統(tǒng)的占主導(dǎo)地位的“國際私法”稱謂不符合國際私法的要求，體現(xiàn)在：第一、“國際”一詞不能使該稱謂包容區(qū)際私法。第二、“私法”一詞不能反映國際私法的本質(zhì)屬性，，且公、私法劃分方法本身也遠(yuǎn)非理想。其它的常見的“法則區(qū)別說”、“法律沖突法”、“涉外私法”、“法律適用法”等也存在問題，未能提供完全的答案�！坝螂H法律適用法”或“域際法律選擇法”的提法可認(rèn)為是其合適的稱謂�！坝螂H”既可指狹義之“地域”，也可以指廣義之“地域”、“時域”、“人域”。另外，“域際”還可指區(qū)際和國際。所以，“域際法律適用法”、“域際法律選擇法”可以同時指代除屬地性國際沖突法之外的屬地性區(qū)際法律沖突法、屬人性的人際法律沖突法、屬時性的時際法律沖突法等。并且，是符合“一國兩制”等中國特殊國情的�！胺蛇m用法”部分提法可放棄不合理的公、私法劃分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；反映了國際私法的性質(zhì)和精神實質(zhì)；符合術(shù)語單義性要求�？傮w上的“域際法律適用法”的提法可將公法沖突納入國際私法調(diào)整范疇；符合法律術(shù)語的“視窗”性要求；有利于本身及相關(guān)部門法和部門法學(xué)的形成和發(fā)展；符合中華民族的相關(guān)歷史、文化傳統(tǒng)和現(xiàn)實國情。
[Abstract]:The title of private international law is a basic problem in private international law. In solving this problem, we should pay attention to the application of both local and world perspective. The scope of private international law is an inherent decisive factor in determining the name of private international law. Its Noumenon scope should only include conflict norm, namely law application norm or law choice norm. Private international law is the specific law that determines under which circumstances the law of which country is applied and how to apply it. Other related norms are independent international civil procedure law, international commercial arbitration law and so on, not private international law. In our country, the traditional title of "private international law" does not conform to the requirements of private international law. Firstly, the term "international" cannot make the term "international" include private international law. Second, the term "private law" cannot reflect the essential attribute of private international law, and the method of dividing private law itself is far from ideal. Other common "law distinction", "conflict of laws", "private law concerning foreign affairs", "law application law" and so on also have problems, which fail to provide a complete answer. The formulation of the Interterritorial Law Application Law or the Interterritorial Law Choice Law can be regarded as a suitable term. "Interdomain" can not only refer to the narrow sense of "region", but also to the broad sense of "region", "time domain", "human domain". In addition, "Interregional" can also refer to interregional and international. Therefore, "Interterritorial Law Application Law" and "Interregional Law Choice Law" can simultaneously refer to the territorial inter-regional conflict law other than the territorial international conflict law, the interpersonal conflict law of human nature, the temporal law of inter-temporal conflict of law, and the law of inter-regional conflict of law, which belongs to human nature, and the law of intertemporal conflict of law, and so on. Moreover, it is in line with China's special national conditions such as "one country, two systems". Part of the formulation of the Law on the Application of Law may give up unreasonable criteria for the division of public and private law, reflecting the nature and spiritual essence of private international law and meeting the requirements of the simplistic nature of the term. On the whole, the formulation of "Interterritorial Law Application Law" can bring the conflict of public law into the scope of adjustment of private international law, accord with the requirement of "window" of legal terminology, be beneficial to the formation and development of its own and related sectoral law and departmental law. In line with the relevant history of the Chinese nation, cultural traditions and the reality of the national conditions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2003
【分類號】：D997
本文編號：2437931
[Abstract]:The title of private international law is a basic problem in private international law. In solving this problem, we should pay attention to the application of both local and world perspective. The scope of private international law is an inherent decisive factor in determining the name of private international law. Its Noumenon scope should only include conflict norm, namely law application norm or law choice norm. Private international law is the specific law that determines under which circumstances the law of which country is applied and how to apply it. Other related norms are independent international civil procedure law, international commercial arbitration law and so on, not private international law. In our country, the traditional title of "private international law" does not conform to the requirements of private international law. Firstly, the term "international" cannot make the term "international" include private international law. Second, the term "private law" cannot reflect the essential attribute of private international law, and the method of dividing private law itself is far from ideal. Other common "law distinction", "conflict of laws", "private law concerning foreign affairs", "law application law" and so on also have problems, which fail to provide a complete answer. The formulation of the Interterritorial Law Application Law or the Interterritorial Law Choice Law can be regarded as a suitable term. "Interdomain" can not only refer to the narrow sense of "region", but also to the broad sense of "region", "time domain", "human domain". In addition, "Interregional" can also refer to interregional and international. Therefore, "Interterritorial Law Application Law" and "Interregional Law Choice Law" can simultaneously refer to the territorial inter-regional conflict law other than the territorial international conflict law, the interpersonal conflict law of human nature, the temporal law of inter-temporal conflict of law, and the law of inter-regional conflict of law, which belongs to human nature, and the law of intertemporal conflict of law, and so on. Moreover, it is in line with China's special national conditions such as "one country, two systems". Part of the formulation of the Law on the Application of Law may give up unreasonable criteria for the division of public and private law, reflecting the nature and spiritual essence of private international law and meeting the requirements of the simplistic nature of the term. On the whole, the formulation of "Interterritorial Law Application Law" can bring the conflict of public law into the scope of adjustment of private international law, accord with the requirement of "window" of legal terminology, be beneficial to the formation and development of its own and related sectoral law and departmental law. In line with the relevant history of the Chinese nation, cultural traditions and the reality of the national conditions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2003
【分類號】：D997
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 謝石松;國際民事訴訟法學(xué)是一個獨立的法學(xué)部門[J];法學(xué)評論;1996年05期
2 高爾森,程寶庫;論國際經(jīng)濟(jì)法與國際公法、國際私法的關(guān)系[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)研究;1997年01期
3 宋春林;論國際私法是國際法的分支[J];煙臺大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1997年04期
4 張普;關(guān)于控制論與動態(tài)語言知識更新的思考(續(xù))[J];語言文字應(yīng)用;2002年01期
本文編號：2437931
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/sflw/2437931.html
