論《鹿特丹規(guī)則》單證托運(yùn)人制度及對(duì)FOB我國(guó)賣(mài)方的影響
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-02-26 18:52
【摘要】:國(guó)際貿(mào)易的80%以上由海上運(yùn)輸完成。2009年,中國(guó)超過(guò)德國(guó)成為全球最大的出口國(guó)。此后,我國(guó)的進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易進(jìn)入一個(gè)非;钴S的時(shí)期。由于我國(guó)國(guó)情特殊,出口方還大多以中、小貨主為主,所以在國(guó)際貨物買(mǎi)賣(mài)中,基本都會(huì)以FOB價(jià)格術(shù)語(yǔ)交易。但是我國(guó)《海商法》對(duì)出口方的權(quán)利保護(hù)方面還并不完善。 單證托運(yùn)人是《鹿特丹規(guī)則》新增設(shè)的概念!堵固氐ひ(guī)則》創(chuàng)設(shè)單證托運(yùn)人,實(shí)際上是試圖為交付貨物的,尤其是FOB貿(mào)易術(shù)語(yǔ)下的賣(mài)方,提供明確的法律上的保障,用來(lái)解決以往的,由于國(guó)際公約規(guī)定不明而造成的糾紛與爭(zhēng)議。所以,本文將以單證托運(yùn)人的概念、權(quán)利、義務(wù)為切入點(diǎn),討論單證托運(yùn)人制度對(duì)我國(guó)FOB賣(mài)方影響。重新審視我國(guó)《海商法》中的托運(yùn)人制度能不能適應(yīng)現(xiàn)代國(guó)際貨物貿(mào)易的發(fā)展,并且吸收《鹿特丹規(guī)則》單證托運(yùn)人制度的合理成份,適當(dāng)?shù)膶?duì)我國(guó)《海商法》提出修改建議。
[Abstract]:More than 80% of international trade is done by sea. In 2009, China overtook Germany as the world's largest exporter. Since then, China's import and export trade has entered a very active period. Due to the special situation of our country, the exporters are mainly medium and small cargo owners, so in the international sale of goods, they will basically trade in FOB price terms. However, China's Maritime Law is not perfect in protecting the rights of exporters. The documentary shipper is a new concept added to the Rotterdam rules. Creating a documentary shipper under the Rotterdam rules is, in fact, an attempt to provide clear legal safeguards for the delivery of goods, in particular the seller under the FOB trade term, Used to resolve disputes and disputes caused by the unclear provisions of international conventions. Therefore, based on the concept, rights and obligations of the documentary shipper, this paper discusses the influence of the documentary shipper system on the FOB seller in China. This paper re-examines whether the shipper system in China's Maritime Code can adapt to the development of modern international trade in goods, and absorbs the reasonable elements of the documentary shipper system in Rotterdam rules, and puts forward appropriate suggestions for amending China's Maritime Code.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D996.19;D922.294
本文編號(hào):2431047
[Abstract]:More than 80% of international trade is done by sea. In 2009, China overtook Germany as the world's largest exporter. Since then, China's import and export trade has entered a very active period. Due to the special situation of our country, the exporters are mainly medium and small cargo owners, so in the international sale of goods, they will basically trade in FOB price terms. However, China's Maritime Law is not perfect in protecting the rights of exporters. The documentary shipper is a new concept added to the Rotterdam rules. Creating a documentary shipper under the Rotterdam rules is, in fact, an attempt to provide clear legal safeguards for the delivery of goods, in particular the seller under the FOB trade term, Used to resolve disputes and disputes caused by the unclear provisions of international conventions. Therefore, based on the concept, rights and obligations of the documentary shipper, this paper discusses the influence of the documentary shipper system on the FOB seller in China. This paper re-examines whether the shipper system in China's Maritime Code can adapt to the development of modern international trade in goods, and absorbs the reasonable elements of the documentary shipper system in Rotterdam rules, and puts forward appropriate suggestions for amending China's Maritime Code.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D996.19;D922.294
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 許小鳳;;交貨托運(yùn)人及其法律問(wèn)題[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年32期
,本文編號(hào):2431047
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/sflw/2431047.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著