【摘要】：雇主責任制度是民法中以雇傭關(guān)系為基礎的一項基本制度。雇傭關(guān)系在海上運輸領(lǐng)域普遍存在,海商法又是民法的特別法,因而海上運輸領(lǐng)域的雇主制度也應當作為海商法的一項基本制度加以研究。筆者試以民法中的雇主責任理論為基礎,結(jié)合海商法的特殊性,對海上運輸中的雇主責任理論作較為系統(tǒng)的分析,以期完善我國海商法的理論基礎,更好的協(xié)調(diào)和理順民法、海商法與相關(guān)國際公約的關(guān)系,進而完善海上運輸領(lǐng)域的法律制度。 本文從基礎理論,基礎關(guān)系,主要問題以及發(fā)展趨勢等四個方面對海上運輸中的雇主責任進行了論述: 在基礎理論部分,對海上運輸中雇主責任的概念、范圍、性質(zhì)進行了界定,確認了無過錯責任是海上運輸中雇主責任的歸責原則;通過分析比較“Himalaya條款”與雇主責任制度的關(guān)系,得出了“Himalaya條款”是海商法與民法兩者價值理念的統(tǒng)一,是雇主責任制度在海上運輸領(lǐng)域特殊性的體現(xiàn);在基礎關(guān)系部分,對船員侵權(quán)行為、船員雇傭關(guān)系及船員職務行為等三項船方承擔雇主責任的基礎條件進行了全面系統(tǒng)的分析:在主要問題部分,就海上運輸中雇主責任制度較之民法雇主責任制度所存在的幾個特殊問題進行了討論,得出了海上運輸中雇主責任的幾個特點;在發(fā)展趨勢部分,分析了《運輸法草案》中“履約方”的責任對雇主責任的影響,鑒于受雇人有別于其他“履約方”的特殊經(jīng)濟:地位,實在不宜將其納入統(tǒng)一的“履約方”責任體系中,而是應當適用雇主責任制度。最后,結(jié)合全文的整體討論,對我國海上運輸中的雇主責任制度體系提出了立法建議。
[Abstract]:Employer liability system is a basic system based on employment relationship in civil law. Employment relationship exists generally in the field of maritime transport, and maritime law is the special law of civil law. Therefore, the employer system in maritime transport should also be studied as a basic system of maritime law. Based on the theory of employer's liability in civil law and the particularity of maritime law, the author makes a systematic analysis of the theory of employer's liability in maritime transportation in order to perfect the theoretical basis of maritime law of our country, better coordinate and straighten out the civil law. The relationship between maritime law and relevant international conventions, and then perfect the legal system in the field of maritime transport. This paper discusses the liability of employers in maritime transport from four aspects: basic theory, basic relations, main problems and development trends. This paper defines the concept, scope and nature of employer's liability in maritime transportation, and confirms that no-fault liability is the imputation principle of employer's liability in maritime transportation. By analyzing and comparing the relationship between "Himalaya clause" and employer's liability system, it is concluded that "Himalaya clause" is the unification of the value concept of maritime law and civil law, and the embodiment of the particularity of employer's liability system in the field of maritime transportation. In the basic relation part, the author makes a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the three basic conditions of the ship's responsibility for the employer: in the main problems, the author makes a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the basic conditions of the crew's tort, the crew's employment relationship and the crew's duties. This paper discusses several special problems existing in the system of employer's liability in maritime transport compared with the system of employer's liability in civil law, and obtains several characteristics of employer's liability in maritime transport. In the trend section, the impact of the liability of the "performing party" in the draft Transport Law on the liability of the employer is analysed, in view of the special economy of the employee as distinct from that of the other "performing parties": status, It is not suitable to bring it into the unified "performing party" liability system, but the employer liability system should be applied. Finally, combined with the whole discussion of the whole text, the author puts forward some legislative suggestions on the system of employer's liability in China's maritime transportation.
【學位授予單位】：大連海事大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：D913;D996.19

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前3條

1 王小明;船員人身傷亡工傷保險賠償問題研究[D];大連海事大學;2010年

2 吳源敢;中國船員服務機構(gòu)法律地位研究[D];大連海事大學;2011年

3 張禾;海上人身傷亡中的雇主責任研究[D];大連海事大學;2011年

，

本文編號：2375701