【摘要】： 保證人抗辯權(quán)是保證人基于為債務(wù)人的債務(wù)履行提供擔(dān)保而獲得的一項(xiàng)重要權(quán)利,也是保證人在保證關(guān)系中用以維護(hù)自身合法權(quán)益的首要法律武器。保證人抗辯權(quán),是指當(dāng)主合同債權(quán)人向保證人提出承擔(dān)保證責(zé)任的請(qǐng)求時(shí),保證人可以根據(jù)一定事由對(duì)抗債權(quán)人請(qǐng)求,拒絕、延緩、減輕或免除承擔(dān)保證責(zé)任的一種權(quán)利。保證法律關(guān)系中,主合同是保證合同的基礎(chǔ),保證合同從屬于主合同。由保證合同所引致的保證人抗辯權(quán)包括兩種類(lèi)型:一種是基于主債權(quán)人和主債務(wù)人之間締結(jié)的主合同而賦予債務(wù)人的一般抗辯權(quán);另一種是一般債務(wù)人不能享有的、專(zhuān)屬于保證人的專(zhuān)屬抗辯權(quán)。經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革以來(lái),我國(guó)已經(jīng)逐漸認(rèn)識(shí)到保障保證人抗辯權(quán)的重要性,有關(guān)保證人抗辯權(quán)的立法逐步完備,然而其缺陷依然存在,因此,針對(duì)其缺陷在制度上對(duì)保證人抗辯權(quán)進(jìn)行完善是非常有必要的。
[Abstract]:The guarantor's right of defense is an important right obtained by the guarantor on the basis of providing security for the debtor's performance of the debt. It is also the primary legal weapon used by the surety to safeguard his own legal rights and interests in the guaranty relationship. The guarantor's right of defense refers to the right of surety who can resist the creditor's request according to certain reasons when the main contract creditor makes a request to the guarantor to accept the guaranty liability. In the legal relationship of warranty, the main contract is the basis of the guarantee contract, and the guarantee contract is subordinate to the main contract. The guarantor's right of defense arising from the contract of guarantee includes two types: one is the general right of defense granted to the debtor on the basis of the main contract concluded between the principal creditor and the principal debtor; The other is the exclusive right of defense which the general debtor cannot enjoy, which belongs exclusively to the guarantor. Since the reform of the economic system, our country has gradually realized the importance of safeguarding the guarantor's right of defense, and the legislation on the guarantor's right of defense has been gradually completed, but its defects still exist, so, It is necessary to perfect the guarantor's right of defense in order to solve its defects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫學(xué)致;保證人權(quán)利若干問(wèn)題解析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年05期

2 吳建依,黃賢宏;試論保證人的一般抗辯權(quán)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年11期

3 吳建依;試論保證人的專(zhuān)屬抗辯權(quán)[J];河北法學(xué);2001年04期

4 王哲;論保證人的權(quán)利[J];前沿;2004年07期

5 于宏偉,李靜;淺論保證與物的擔(dān)保并存時(shí)的責(zé)任承擔(dān)——對(duì)《擔(dān)保法》第28條及其解釋第38條的質(zhì)疑與完善[J];廣東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

6 苑兆義;擔(dān)保合同中保證人的責(zé)任與權(quán)利[J];勝利油田師范專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

7 王進(jìn)軒;論保證人的抗辯權(quán)[J];蘭州商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

8 徐雅麗;略論保證人的權(quán)利[J];遼寧師專(zhuān)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

9 王登春,孫昌興;論保證的獨(dú)立性[J];同濟(jì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年01期

10 潘云華;反保證人的抗辯權(quán)[J];江南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2358840