【摘要】：承運(yùn)人無(wú)單放貨問(wèn)題是一個(gè)長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)始終存在頗多爭(zhēng)議的法律問(wèn)題，由此出現(xiàn)了各種不同的觀點(diǎn)和針對(duì)相似案件的不同判決。本文試圖通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)《海商法》相關(guān)規(guī)定的分析，，引申出海運(yùn)提單項(xiàng)下的提貨權(quán)的概念，并針對(duì)這一權(quán)利的理論問(wèn)題進(jìn)行闡述，從而為解決這些法律問(wèn)題提供一定的理論參考。 本文第1章從我國(guó)《海商法》的規(guī)定出發(fā)，比較分析相關(guān)法律規(guī)定，引伸出海運(yùn)提單項(xiàng)下提貨權(quán)的概念。第2章論述海運(yùn)提單項(xiàng)下提貨權(quán)的來(lái)源，比較分析了有關(guān)海運(yùn)提單項(xiàng)下提貨權(quán)來(lái)源的不同觀點(diǎn)，并提出了自己的主張。第3章論述海運(yùn)提單項(xiàng)下提貨權(quán)的屬性，結(jié)合海運(yùn)提單項(xiàng)下提貨權(quán)的特點(diǎn)論述了提貨權(quán)的債權(quán)性，并分析了提單質(zhì)押時(shí)權(quán)利質(zhì)權(quán)的標(biāo)的及其性質(zhì)。第4章結(jié)合我國(guó)法律的規(guī)定論述了主張?zhí)嶝洐?quán)的條件，并特別分析了指示提單情況下提貨權(quán)的權(quán)利主體及對(duì)提單持有人的正確理解。第5章分析了海運(yùn)提單項(xiàng)下提貨權(quán)行使的相關(guān)問(wèn)題。第6章將海運(yùn)提單項(xiàng)下提貨權(quán)的理論運(yùn)用到無(wú)單放貨問(wèn)題的分析中，指出無(wú)單放貨侵犯的客體是提貨權(quán)，提出無(wú)單放貨賠償請(qǐng)求的人必須具有提單項(xiàng)下的提貨權(quán)。
[Abstract]:The carrier's delivery of goods without bill is a controversial legal issue for a long time, resulting in different viewpoints and different judgments on similar cases. Through the analysis of the relevant provisions of Maritime Law of China, this paper attempts to extend the concept of the right to pick up goods under the bill of lading, and to expound the theoretical problems of this right, so as to provide a certain theoretical reference for solving these legal problems. The first chapter of this paper starts from the provisions of China's Maritime Law, compares and analyzes the relevant legal provisions, and extends the concept of the right to pick up goods under the maritime bill of lading. Chapter 2 discusses the origin of the right to pick up goods under the bill of lading, compares and analyzes the different viewpoints of the right of delivery under the bill of lading, and puts forward its own opinion. The third chapter discusses the property of the right to pick up goods under the bill of lading, discusses the creditor's rights of the right of delivery according to the characteristics of the right of delivery under the item of bill of lading, and analyzes the object and nature of the right of pledge when the bill of lading is pledged. Chapter 4 discusses the conditions of the right to pick up goods in combination with the provisions of Chinese law, and especially analyzes the subject of the right to pick up goods and the correct understanding of the holder of the bill of lading in the case of instructive bill of lading. Chapter 5 analyzes the related problems of the right of delivery under the bill of lading. Chapter 6 applies the theory of right of delivery under bill of lading to the analysis of the problem of delivery without bill of lading, and points out that the object of non-bill of lading infringement is the right to pick up goods, and the person who puts forward the claim for delivery of goods without bill of lading must have the right to pick up goods under bill of lading.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2004
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 劉麗媛;論國(guó)際海上貨物運(yùn)輸合同中的控制權(quán)[D];大連海事大學(xué);2005年

2 陳文清;《運(yùn)輸法公約草案》中貨物交付問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2007年

3 王媛媛;論國(guó)際海上貨物運(yùn)輸合同下的提貨義務(wù)[D];大連海事大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：2353899