【摘要】：海事賠償責(zé)任限制制度是海商法特有的制度。為了更好的發(fā)揮該實(shí)體法制度的功能,我國(guó)在海事訴訟法中構(gòu)建專(zhuān)門(mén)海事賠償責(zé)任限制基金程序制度配合之適用,有力地促進(jìn)了我國(guó)海事賠償責(zé)任限制類(lèi)案件的解決。而債權(quán)人會(huì)議制度是海事賠償責(zé)任限制基金程序制度的重要組成部分,其在協(xié)商船舶價(jià)款、海事賠償責(zé)任限制基金分配方案及簽訂受償協(xié)議方面發(fā)揮著重要作用。 然而,由于我國(guó)立法上制度構(gòu)建的不完善甚至是缺失,導(dǎo)致了其在司法實(shí)踐中缺乏可操作性；債權(quán)人會(huì)議制度及其相關(guān)程序在海事立法及司法實(shí)踐中的邏輯混亂,更導(dǎo)致了這一制度設(shè)計(jì)目的不能實(shí)現(xiàn)。加之,在海事司法實(shí)踐中運(yùn)用這一制度解決相關(guān)問(wèn)題的機(jī)會(huì)較少,這就導(dǎo)致這一制度在海事訴訟立法和實(shí)踐中較少為人關(guān)注。 本文從債權(quán)人會(huì)議的概念分析出發(fā),系統(tǒng)討論了債權(quán)人會(huì)議制度在海事賠償責(zé)任限制基金程序中設(shè)立的必要性,主要體現(xiàn)在保護(hù)債權(quán)人的合法權(quán)益、平衡海事事故當(dāng)事方間的利益及使基金程序更加體系化等方面。接著,本文以債權(quán)人會(huì)議的運(yùn)作流程為分析基點(diǎn),在對(duì)該制度在程序上的運(yùn)作流程進(jìn)行深入分析和研究的基礎(chǔ)上,指出債權(quán)人會(huì)議制度在參會(huì)主體、開(kāi)會(huì)議題、會(huì)議功能,及其與確權(quán)訴訟關(guān)系等方面的問(wèn)題所曾現(xiàn)出來(lái)的內(nèi)在邏輯性混亂、制度構(gòu)建的不周延性等問(wèn)題。同時(shí),本文以挪威法海事賠償責(zé)任限制基金程序下基金會(huì)議的運(yùn)作流程為參考,從該制度的基本運(yùn)作流程為出發(fā)點(diǎn),系統(tǒng)闡述基金會(huì)議的運(yùn)作流程,并總結(jié)出了基金會(huì)議制度在會(huì)議召集期限、基金會(huì)議前的工作、參會(huì)主體及該制度與其相關(guān)程序方面所具有顯著特點(diǎn)。本論文在對(duì)我國(guó)債權(quán)人會(huì)議制度和挪威基金會(huì)議制度進(jìn)行深入研究的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)這兩種制度進(jìn)行比較研究。最后,本文從系統(tǒng)構(gòu)建我國(guó)海事賠償責(zé)任限制基金程序下債權(quán)人會(huì)議制度的全局出發(fā),在上述研究的基礎(chǔ)上指出挪威法下基金會(huì)議制度對(duì)我國(guó)債權(quán)人會(huì)議制度在調(diào)整債權(quán)人會(huì)議制度和確權(quán)訴訟關(guān)系和強(qiáng)化法院在債權(quán)人會(huì)議前的責(zé)任等方面具有的可借鑒之處,并在針對(duì)我國(guó)債權(quán)人會(huì)議制度構(gòu)建本身及其實(shí)踐中存在的問(wèn)題給出完善的具體措施。
[Abstract]:The limitation system of maritime liability is a special system of maritime law. In order to give full play to the function of the substantive law system, our country constructs the special maritime claim liability limitation fund procedure system in the maritime procedural law to cooperate with it, which has promoted the solution of the maritime claim liability limitation case in our country. The system of creditors' meeting is an important part of the procedure system of the limitation fund for maritime claim liability, which plays an important role in negotiating the price of the ship, the allocation scheme of the limitation fund for maritime claim liability and the signing of the indemnity agreement. However, due to the imperfection or even lack of system construction in our country's legislation, it lacks operability in judicial practice, and the creditors' meeting system and its related procedures are in confusion in maritime legislation and judicial practice. Even more, the design of this system can not be achieved. In addition, there are few opportunities to use this system to solve related problems in maritime judicial practice, which leads to less attention to this system in maritime litigation legislation and practice. Based on the analysis of the concept of creditors' meeting, this paper systematically discusses the necessity of establishing the system of creditors' meeting in the procedure of limitation of liability for maritime claims, which is mainly embodied in the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of creditors. Balance the interests between the parties involved in maritime accidents and make the fund procedure more systematic. Then, based on the analysis of the operation process of the creditors' meeting, on the basis of the in-depth analysis and study of the procedure of the system, the paper points out that the creditors' meeting system is in the main body of the meeting, the meeting topic, the meeting function, the main body of the meeting, the subject of the meeting and the function of the meeting. The inherent logic confusion and the inefficiency of the construction of the system have appeared in the relationship between the system and the right of confirmation. At the same time, based on the operational process of the fund meeting under the Norwegian law maritime claims limitation fund procedure, and starting from the basic operation process of the system, this paper systematically expounds the operation process of the fund meeting. The paper also sums up the remarkable characteristics of the meeting system of the Fund in terms of the duration of the meeting, the work before the meeting of the Fund, the participants and the relevant procedures of the system. This paper makes a comparative study of the creditor meeting system and the Norwegian fund meeting system. Finally, this paper starts from the overall situation of constructing the creditors' meeting system under the procedure of limitation of liability for maritime claims in China. On the basis of the above research, the paper points out that the meeting system of the fund under Norwegian law can be used for reference in the aspects of adjusting the system of creditors' meeting and confirming the litigation relation of the creditor's rights and strengthening the court's responsibility before the creditors' meeting. The author also puts forward some concrete measures to perfect the problems existing in the construction and practice of the creditors' meeting system in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 許俊強(qiáng);;確權(quán)訴訟程序法律問(wèn)題研究[J];法律適用;2006年Z1期

2 鄧麗娟;;論實(shí)現(xiàn)海事賠償責(zé)任限制權(quán)利程序的完善[J];集美大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2007年04期

3 施文,伍載陽(yáng);海事賠償責(zé)任限制的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)研究;1994年03期

4 許俊強(qiáng);析限制海事賠償責(zé)任的方式[J];人民司法;2001年03期

5 肖建國(guó);;程序效益論[J];訴訟法論叢;1998年02期

6 鄧松,敖小勇,趙偉;船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)與海事賠償責(zé)任限制[J];水運(yùn)管理;2005年05期

7 崔巖;;淺析海事賠償責(zé)任限制權(quán)利的喪失[J];中國(guó)水運(yùn)(學(xué)術(shù)版);2006年10期

8 董紅;;關(guān)于破產(chǎn)債權(quán)人會(huì)議制度的思考[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年06期

9 邢娜;;美國(guó)海事責(zé)任限制的法律適用[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年05期

10 劉怡如;船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)和海事賠償責(zé)任限制的沖突和解決[J];法治論叢;2004年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 雷霆;海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序制度研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2001年

2 祝默泉;論完善我國(guó)海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序制度[D];大連海事大學(xué);2003年

3 賀洪龍;海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2007年

4 蔡琬彬;海事訴訟之確權(quán)訴訟研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2287933