【摘要】：正 中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制的改革,經(jīng)過(guò)十多年來(lái)的探索和試驗(yàn),終于確立了市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的目標(biāo)模式。市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)機(jī)制有序有效地運(yùn)行,則以一整套體系完備、內(nèi)容合理的交易規(guī)則與公平競(jìng)爭(zhēng)機(jī)制的形成為先決條件,在這一點(diǎn)上法學(xué)界達(dá)成了前所未有的共識(shí),加強(qiáng)以商品經(jīng)濟(jì)為核心,以人的權(quán)利意識(shí)和主體意識(shí)為基礎(chǔ)的民商立法成為人們的普遍主張。但在具體立法模式上,即究竟采取民商合一主義還是民商分立主義以及別種模式的具體構(gòu)想等問(wèn)題的理論研究上,都與完善市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)法律體系的實(shí)踐要求相距甚遠(yuǎn),本文在此僅就這一問(wèn)題作一探討,以求同仁指正。一、民商分立歷史根源的分析在現(xiàn)代法律中,不論立法模式如何,商法作為調(diào)整商
[Abstract]:The reform of China's economic system, after more than ten years of exploration and experiment, has finally established the target mode of market economy. The orderly and effective operation of the market economy mechanism presupposes the formation of a complete set of transaction rules with reasonable contents and a fair competition mechanism. On this point, the legal community has reached an unprecedented consensus. Strengthening the civil and commercial legislation with commodity economy as the core and people's right consciousness and subject consciousness as the basis has become a popular proposition. However, the theoretical research on the specific legislative model, that is, whether to adopt the doctrine of integration of the civil and commercial, the separation of the civil and commercial, and the specific conception of the alternative mode, is far from the practical requirement of perfecting the legal system of the market economy. This article only makes a discussion to this question, in order to seek the colleague to correct. An Analysis of the Historical causes of the Separation of Civil and Commercial Affairs; in modern law, regardless of the legislative model, commercial law is used as a regulator of business.

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 屈廣清;;中國(guó)海事法律適用法修改的具體建議[J];海峽法學(xué);2011年02期

2 吳敬軒;;中國(guó)公司減資制度研究[J];北方文學(xué)(下半月);2011年06期

3 王海明;;中W破u#法曑於企im重生Qiz.制度的移植，

本文編號(hào)：2235854