【摘要】： 本文通過(guò)案例分析,并借鑒國(guó)外立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出了處理有限責(zé)任公司瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題的建議,以期對(duì)司法實(shí)踐有所幫助。本文僅討論有限責(zé)任公司中由于出資瑕疵形成的股權(quán)在轉(zhuǎn)讓中涉及到的股東資格、轉(zhuǎn)讓效力和轉(zhuǎn)讓后的責(zé)任問(wèn)題。 本文除導(dǎo)言、結(jié)語(yǔ)外主要分為三章,分別從一個(gè)典型案例出發(fā),闡述本文涉及的三個(gè)主題。 第一章,瑕疵股權(quán)的股東資格問(wèn)題。列出案例后,首先介紹了瑕疵股權(quán)的概念和分類(lèi)；其次詳細(xì)分析了瑕疵股權(quán)是否可以否定其股東資格的問(wèn)題,本文認(rèn)為,不能因瑕疵出資否定其股東資格,但是可以限制其股東權(quán)的行使；最后對(duì)本章案例進(jìn)行評(píng)述。 第二章,瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的效力問(wèn)題。列出案例后,首先介紹了瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的概念,股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同及其轉(zhuǎn)讓行為生效的問(wèn)題,其次列舉了瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓效力的四種觀點(diǎn),接著對(duì)上述四種觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了辯證分析,最后在此基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合本章案例提出本文對(duì)上述觀點(diǎn)的發(fā)展——“嚴(yán)格可撤銷(xiāo)說(shuō)”。 第三章,瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后的責(zé)任問(wèn)題。列出案例后,在對(duì)責(zé)任承擔(dān)的四種觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行批判分析的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合本章案例得出本文觀點(diǎn)：即在遵循民商法辯證統(tǒng)一的理念基礎(chǔ)上,區(qū)別股權(quán)對(duì)內(nèi)、對(duì)外轉(zhuǎn)讓兩種情況下予以具體分析。 實(shí)踐中,因?yàn)闆](méi)有明確的法律規(guī)定予以指導(dǎo),瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓糾紛爭(zhēng)議特別大。本文在此僅做試探性討論,期望相關(guān)法規(guī)盡早出臺(tái)。
[Abstract]:Based on the analysis of cases and the experience of foreign legislation, this paper puts forward some suggestions to deal with the legal problems related to the transfer of defective shares in limited liability companies, in order to help the judicial practice. This paper only discusses the qualification of shareholders, the validity of transfer and the liability after transfer of equity in limited liability company due to the defect of capital contribution. In addition to the introduction, the conclusion is mainly divided into three chapters, starting from a typical case, this paper expounds the three topics involved. The first chapter is about the shareholder qualification of defective shares. After listing the cases, it introduces the concept and classification of defective equity, and then analyzes in detail whether defective equity can negate its shareholder qualification. However, it can restrict the exercise of shareholders' rights. Finally, the case of this chapter is reviewed. The second chapter is about the validity of the transfer of defective shares. After listing the cases, this paper first introduces the concept of defective equity transfer, the issue of the validity of equity transfer contract and its transfer behavior, then enumerates four viewpoints on the validity of defective equity transfer, and then makes a dialectical analysis of the above four views. On the basis of this, this paper puts forward the development of the above-mentioned viewpoint-"strictly revocable theory" combined with the case of this chapter. The third chapter is about the liability after the transfer of defective shares. After listing the cases, on the basis of critical analysis of the four viewpoints of responsibility, combined with the case of this chapter, the author draws the opinion of this article: that is, on the basis of the dialectical unity of civil and commercial law, the equity right is different from the inside. Foreign transfer under two circumstances to specific analysis. In practice, due to the lack of clear legal provisions to guide, the dispute over the transfer of defective shares is particularly controversial. This article is only a tentative discussion, hoping that the relevant laws and regulations will be issued as soon as possible.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 趙紅巧;有限責(zé)任公司瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

2 王斌;瑕疵出資股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓法律問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2226243