【摘要】：自1993年《海商法》施行以來,我國海上運輸中承運人的貨物留置權(quán)問題,就一直是理論與實務(wù)界的一個熱門話題,由于法律規(guī)定不明確及理論研究的局限性,司法實踐中存在著普遍的困惑。對該問題的研究,經(jīng)歷了不同的幾個階段。在《合同法》出臺前,理論與實務(wù)界比較一致的意見是海上運輸中承運人只能留置債務(wù)人所有的貨物;隨著《合同法》的實施,該問題一度“柳暗花明”;但隨著《擔保法》司法解釋的頒布,該解釋中關(guān)于“善意留置”的規(guī)定實難適用于貨物運輸合同中。承運人的貨物留置權(quán)真猶如“鏡花水月”難以援用。中國《海商法》規(guī)定承運人貨物留置權(quán)的真意是什么?其法源在何處?其與一般的民事留置權(quán)的成立要件相同嗎?其行使的程序當如何?這些問題正是本文研究的內(nèi)容。借助傅郁林老師充分和深入的研究,作者提出了自己對此問題的理解,及完善我國海運承運人貨物留置權(quán)制度的設(shè)想,希望借《海商法》修改東風此設(shè)想能成為現(xiàn)實。本文共分四章,第一章介紹我國海運承運人貨物留置權(quán)制度立法和理論研究的逐步發(fā)展。我國海上運輸中的承運人貨物留置權(quán)制度是逐步發(fā)展起來的。其發(fā)展可分為3個階段,第1階段為《合同法》實施前,第2階段為《合同法》實施至《擔保法司法解釋》出臺前,第3階段為《擔保法司法解釋》施行后即當前。第二章詳細介紹和分析大陸法各國的海運承運人貨物留置權(quán)制度。通過比較的方法,了解各國為達到保護承運人債權(quán)的目的,如何通過設(shè)置不同的留置權(quán)制度和其它制度的配合來實現(xiàn)的。第三章考察和分析我國《海商法》規(guī)定的海運承運人貨物留置權(quán)制度的法源、性質(zhì)、構(gòu)成要件及其行使。我國《海商法》規(guī)定的海運
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of Maritime Law in 1993, the issue of carrier's lien on goods in maritime transport in China has been a hot topic in the field of theory and practice. There is a general confusion in judicial practice. The study of this problem has gone through several different stages. Before the "contract Law" came into being, the theory and practice agreed that the carrier could only keep all the goods of the debtor in the maritime transport, and with the implementation of the contract Law, the problem was once "bright and dark". However, with the promulgation of the judicial interpretation of the guarantee Law, it is difficult to apply the "bona fide lien" in the interpretation to the contract of carriage of goods. The carrier's right of lien on the goods is as difficult to invoke as the "Mirror Flower Moon". What is the true meaning of China's Maritime Law under the carrier's lien on goods? Where is the source of its law? Is it the same as the common civil lien? What is the procedure for its exercise? These problems are the contents of this paper. With the help of teacher Fu Yu-lin 's full and in-depth research, the author puts forward his own understanding of this problem and the idea of perfecting the system of lien on goods by sea carriers in China. It is hoped that the idea of modifying Dongfeng by means of Maritime Law can become a reality. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter introduces the gradual development of the legislation and theoretical research on the lien of goods by sea carrier in China. The system of carrier's lien on goods in maritime transport in China has been developed step by step. Its development can be divided into three stages: the first stage is before the implementation of the contract Law, the second stage is the implementation of the contract Law to the Judicial interpretation of the Guaranty Law, and the third stage is the current one after the implementation of the guarantee Law Judicial interpretation. Chapter two introduces and analyzes the system of lien of goods of marine carrier in various countries of continental law in detail. By means of comparison, we can find out how to achieve the purpose of protecting the carrier's creditor's rights by setting up different lien systems and the cooperation of other systems. Chapter three investigates and analyzes the legal source, nature, constitution and exercise of the lien system of goods of sea carriers stipulated in Maritime Law of China. Maritime Transport in the Maritime Law of China
【學位授予單位】：華東政法學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2004
【分類號】：D922.294

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 伊媛媛;論環(huán)境侵權(quán)構(gòu)成要件的調(diào)整[J];江漢大學學報(人文科學版);2005年02期

2 樓曉;賈群增;;淺析我國的公司法人人格否認制度[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2007年17期

3 畢曉平;;論債權(quán)人的代位權(quán)及其完善[J];現(xiàn)代企業(yè)教育;2007年18期

4 閻慰萱;趙亮亮;;淺析我國公司法人人格否認制度[J];黑龍江對外經(jīng)貿(mào);2008年03期

5 馬克清;;淺析侵占罪的概念及構(gòu)成要件[J];新疆廣播電視大學學報;2009年03期

6 賀，

本文編號：2125536