本文選題：托運(yùn)人 + 第二種托運(yùn)人��； 參考：《上海海運(yùn)學(xué)院》2001年碩士論文

【摘要】： 在海上運(yùn)輸合同中，托運(yùn)人是一個(gè)十分重要的主體�，F(xiàn)行的《海商法》對(duì)托運(yùn)人作了兩種定義。在具體的法律適用中，對(duì)托運(yùn)人這一主體已經(jīng)形成了分歧意見。《海商法》對(duì)托運(yùn)人的兩種定義意味著什么?會(huì)不會(huì)同時(shí)存在第二種托運(yùn)人?第二種托運(yùn)人存在的條件和法律后果是什么? 本文通過一般法律原則，現(xiàn)有的海商法理論以及航運(yùn)業(yè)務(wù)的實(shí)踐來論證第二種托運(yùn)人現(xiàn)象的可能性和現(xiàn)實(shí)性，，并就此提出了自己的看法，著重解決第二種托運(yùn)人的法律適用問題，分析了法律適用時(shí)必須在航運(yùn)業(yè)務(wù)中予以澄清的若干問題。試圖通過這一思考過程，能對(duì)《海商法》的定義有更清晰的認(rèn)識(shí)，并希望以此減少一些在實(shí)際業(yè)務(wù)中對(duì)相關(guān)問題的困惑。 文章根據(jù)現(xiàn)有的理論對(duì)第二種托運(yùn)人的現(xiàn)象作了初步分析和歸納，認(rèn)為在現(xiàn)行的《海商法》體系下，運(yùn)輸合同中除了通常的“訂立合同”的托運(yùn)人之外，在一定條件下還會(huì)存在第二種“向承運(yùn)人交付貨物”的托運(yùn)人，指出在同一個(gè)海上貨物運(yùn)輸合同中，只要“訂立運(yùn)輸合同”的行為與“將貨物交給承運(yùn)人”的行為相分離，即可從兩個(gè)完全獨(dú)立的角度去理解托運(yùn)人。 為對(duì)問題能有較全面的認(rèn)識(shí)，文章具體分析了國(guó)內(nèi)理論界以及司法實(shí)踐對(duì)這一問題的看法以及各種看法的演變過程，通過對(duì)比其中的一些分歧意見，論證了第二種托運(yùn)人存在的必然性和法律適用的客觀趨勢(shì)。文章還對(duì)設(shè)立第二種托運(yùn)人的目的進(jìn)行了探討，并針對(duì)這一目的的通常觀點(diǎn)談了一些個(gè)人的體會(huì)，著重從具體航運(yùn)業(yè)務(wù)的角度來闡述立法設(shè)立第二種托運(yùn)人的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義，也從一個(gè)側(cè)面對(duì)第二種托運(yùn)人的法律適用提出了個(gè)人的觀點(diǎn)。 最后，根據(jù)自己若干年來的業(yè)務(wù)實(shí)踐和親身體會(huì)，針對(duì)現(xiàn)有的分歧意見，以理論聯(lián)系實(shí)際的方法提出自己的看法或解決方案，同時(shí)較系統(tǒng)地從運(yùn)輸合同的成立、提單的記載、提單的簽發(fā)、運(yùn)費(fèi)的支付和托運(yùn)人過錯(cuò)的承擔(dān)等存在爭(zhēng)議的環(huán)節(jié)，分析了運(yùn)輸合同中兩種不同類型托運(yùn)人的聯(lián)系和區(qū)別，從而達(dá)到對(duì)第二種托運(yùn)人能有一種較完整的、科學(xué)的認(rèn)識(shí)。
[Abstract]:In the contract of carriage by sea, the shipper is a very important subject. The current Maritime Code defines shipper in two ways. In the specific application of the law, there have been divergent views on the shipper as the subject. What does the two definitions of shipper mean in the CMR? Could there be a second kind of shipper at the same time? What are the conditions and legal consequences for the existence of the second type of shipper? This paper demonstrates the possibility and reality of the second kind of shippers' phenomenon through the general legal principles, the existing maritime law theory and the practice of shipping business, and puts forward its own views. The application of the second kind of shipper's law is mainly solved, and some problems which must be clarified in shipping operation are analyzed. Through this thinking process, we can have a clearer understanding of the definition of Maritime Code, and hope to reduce the confusion of some related problems in the actual business. According to the existing theories, this paper makes a preliminary analysis and induction of the second kind of shippers' phenomenon, and concludes that under the current system of Maritime Law, the contract of carriage is in addition to the usual "contract conclusion" shipper. Under certain conditions, there will also be a second type of shipper "delivering goods to the carrier", noting that in the same contract of carriage of goods by sea, as long as the act of "entering into a contract of carriage" is separated from the act of "handing the goods over to the carrier", The shipper can be understood from two completely independent perspectives. In order to have a more comprehensive understanding of the problem, the article concretely analyzes the views of the domestic theorists and judicial practice on this issue and the evolution of various views. It demonstrates the inevitability of the second kind of shipper and the objective trend of the application of law. The article also discusses the purpose of establishing the second kind of shipper, and discusses some personal experiences in the light of the general viewpoint of this purpose, and emphatically expounds the practical significance of legislating the establishment of the second kind of shipper from the point of view of specific shipping business. It also puts forward a personal view on the application of the second kind of shipper's law from one side. Finally, according to my own business practice and personal experience over the past several years, in view of the existing differences of opinion, I put forward my own views or solutions by combining theory with practice, and at the same time, more systematically from the establishment of the contract of carriage, the recording of bills of lading, The issue of bill of lading, the payment of freight and the liability of the shipper's fault are discussed in this paper. The connection and difference between the two different types of shippers in the contract of carriage are analyzed, so as to have a complete relationship with the second kind of shipper. Scientific understanding.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海海運(yùn)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2001
【分類號(hào)】：D996.19

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 余妙宏;海上貨物運(yùn)輸合同中托運(yùn)人法律制度研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 陳莉莉;論FOB賣方在海上貨物運(yùn)輸下的利益保護(hù)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

2 張茜;論海上危險(xiǎn)品運(yùn)輸承托雙方法律責(zé)任劃界問題[D];大連海事大學(xué);2011年

3 周美榮;交貨托運(yùn)人法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2008年

4 宋海華;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》單證托運(yùn)人權(quán)利義務(wù)研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：2036822