本文選題：保證 + 明示保證��； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2005年碩士論文

【摘要】：保證,起源于英國(guó)海上保險(xiǎn)�！�1906年海上保險(xiǎn)法》共有九條有關(guān)保證的 規(guī)定。在我國(guó),保證是海上保險(xiǎn)合同中特有的一項(xiàng)規(guī)章制度。但是在《保險(xiǎn)法》 和《海商法》中都沒(méi)有對(duì)保證這一概念做出定義。我國(guó)法律中僅有的關(guān)于保證的 內(nèi)容就是《海商法》第235條關(guān)于違反保證條款的后果的規(guī)定。這種立法上的疏 漏與保證在保險(xiǎn),特別是在海上保險(xiǎn)中的重要地位不相稱(chēng),也由此導(dǎo)致了海上保 險(xiǎn)實(shí)務(wù)與司法實(shí)踐中的一些問(wèn)題。 本文總結(jié)了英國(guó)、美國(guó)、德國(guó)和挪威海上保險(xiǎn)法中有關(guān)保證以及與保證相 關(guān)的法律制度的規(guī)定,并參考實(shí)踐中普遍使用的海上保險(xiǎn)合同條款,分析了當(dāng)今 國(guó)際海上保險(xiǎn)業(yè)中保證的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。同時(shí)結(jié)合我國(guó)現(xiàn)有立法及保險(xiǎn)條款中有關(guān)保 證的規(guī)定,對(duì)我國(guó)《海商法》及海上保險(xiǎn)條款中有關(guān)保證規(guī)定的修改提出建議。 本文通過(guò)研究認(rèn)為,保證在我國(guó)《海商法》中仍應(yīng)存在,而且《海商法》中 應(yīng)對(duì)保證的定義進(jìn)行明確。但對(duì)于違反保證的法律后果不宜過(guò)于嚴(yán)厲�！逗Ｉ谭ā� 中不宜規(guī)定保證的具體事項(xiàng),應(yīng)留待在保險(xiǎn)條款中進(jìn)行約定。而在保險(xiǎn)條款中, 保證的事項(xiàng)也應(yīng)進(jìn)行適當(dāng)控制,以達(dá)到既能合理控制風(fēng)險(xiǎn),又能均衡保險(xiǎn)合同雙 方權(quán)利和義務(wù)的目的。
[Abstract]:Warranty, originated in British marine insurance. < 1906 Marine Insurance Act, there are nine warranty provisions. In our country, warranty is a special regulation in marine insurance contract. However, the concept of warranty is not defined in the Insurance Act and the Maritime Code. The only content of warranty in Chinese law is Article 235 of Maritime Law on the consequences of breach of warranty. Such legislative gaps are not commensurate with the importance of security in insurance, especially in marine insurance, It also leads to some problems in marine insurance practice and judicial practice. This paper summarizes the provisions of the maritime insurance laws of the United Kingdom, the United States, Germany and Norway concerning warranties and the legal systems relating to warranties. Referring to the terms of marine insurance contracts which are widely used in practice, the development trend of international marine insurance guarantee is analyzed. At the same time, in combination with the existing legislation and the provisions of the insurance clause, the author puts forward some suggestions on the modification of the warranty provisions in the Maritime Law and the Marine Insurance Clause in China. This paper holds that the guarantee should still exist in the Maritime Law of our country, and the definition of guarantee should be clearly defined in the Maritime Law of China. However, the legal consequences of breach of warranty should not be too strict. In the insurance clause, the guarantee should also be properly controlled so that the risk can be reasonably controlled. The purpose of double-party rights and obligations of insurance contract can be balanced.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.294;D922.284

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 劉春宇;海上保險(xiǎn)中保證法律制度研究[D];哈爾濱工程大學(xué);2010年

2 張慶明;海上保險(xiǎn)國(guó)際統(tǒng)一法律制度構(gòu)建研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2010年

3 李正;海上保險(xiǎn)法最大誠(chéng)信原則變革研究——談我國(guó)相關(guān)法律制度完善[D];大連海事大學(xué);2011年

4 陳朗;論我國(guó)海上保險(xiǎn)法律中保證制度的構(gòu)建[D];大連海事大學(xué);2008年

5 楊瑩穎;保險(xiǎn)合同法中的保證義務(wù)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

6 高新雪;海上保險(xiǎn)保證制度變革及對(duì)我國(guó)立法的借鑒[D];大連海事大學(xué);2008年

7 趙穎;建立我國(guó)海上保險(xiǎn)保證制度的相關(guān)問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2009年

8 褚寧;保險(xiǎn)合同保證條款制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2035687