本文選題：性 + 性別�。� 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：性騷擾問題是世界性的社會(huì)難題，在國人的眼里性騷擾也不是什么新鮮的事物。隨著現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的發(fā)展以及人們維權(quán)意識的提高，性騷擾現(xiàn)象慢慢進(jìn)入人們的視野并引起人們的極大關(guān)注。然而，人們卻逐漸意識到該問題出現(xiàn)的嚴(yán)重性，盡管有關(guān)性騷擾的案件時(shí)有發(fā)生，在當(dāng)時(shí)也會(huì)引起很大的轟動(dòng)，但往往最后卻“無疾而終”。受害者的無奈、騷擾者的僥幸，自始至終都圍繞在性騷擾的周圍，讓它在成為媒體關(guān)注焦點(diǎn)的同時(shí)，也成為了立法的難題和難點(diǎn)。 有關(guān)性騷擾問題的基礎(chǔ)理論研究起源于美國，性騷擾概念的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展與女性主義運(yùn)動(dòng)密不可分，可以說，，對性騷擾問題的研究是由女性主義運(yùn)動(dòng)和女性主義法學(xué)醞釀而來的。當(dāng)時(shí)的激進(jìn)女性主義法學(xué)家從性騷擾不僅違背道德，而且具有可訴性的角度出發(fā)，認(rèn)為性騷擾是對女性的性別歧視，應(yīng)該盡早結(jié)束在職場中對女性的歧視和性騷擾現(xiàn)象。然而，介于當(dāng)時(shí)的政治和經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境，這些研究基本上都圍繞著有關(guān)工作場所的性騷擾問題，在民商法領(lǐng)域展開討論，結(jié)果導(dǎo)致對于性騷擾的概念認(rèn)識有很大的差異。因此，對于性騷擾問題的研究最重要的就是弄清楚性騷擾的概念，性騷擾現(xiàn)象的出現(xiàn)帶來了怎樣的法律問題，對此又應(yīng)該用什么樣的法律手段去解決。 本文從女性主義法學(xué)的視角出發(fā)，對女性主義法學(xué)性騷擾的概念進(jìn)行界定、對性騷擾問題的法律價(jià)值進(jìn)行分析，并試圖對中國的反性騷擾提出一些立法方面的建議。具體的寫作思路如下：第一部分梳理一下女性主義法學(xué)的性騷擾概念，對其概念進(jìn)行三方面的探討；第二部分對性騷擾問題的法律價(jià)值進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的闡述，主要是從性、性別與法律、傳統(tǒng)的公共/私人領(lǐng)域的二元?jiǎng)澐�，尤其是女性主義法學(xué)的性別觀等三個(gè)層次來分析性騷擾現(xiàn)象的本質(zhì)問題；第三部分是對性騷擾問題進(jìn)行理論的研究后，將視線轉(zhuǎn)移回對反性騷擾的立法提出建議，列舉我國發(fā)生的一些性騷擾案例，指出現(xiàn)階段我國反性騷擾立法存在的困境，借鑒女性主義法學(xué)關(guān)于性騷擾問題的立法實(shí)踐，對中國的反性騷擾立法從理論和實(shí)踐上提出自己的一些建議。用立法的方式對性騷擾問題進(jìn)行規(guī)制，是應(yīng)對當(dāng)下出現(xiàn)的越來越多性騷擾案例的現(xiàn)實(shí)選擇。對性騷擾的概念進(jìn)行界定，提出適合我國國情的性騷擾概念，在解決立法難題的同時(shí)，也能為司法實(shí)踐提供更多理論上的支持。
[Abstract]:Sexual harassment is a worldwide social problem, in the eyes of Chinese sexual harassment is not a new thing. With the development of modern society and the improvement of people's awareness of human rights, the phenomenon of sexual harassment has gradually entered people's vision and aroused people's great concern. However, people are gradually aware of the seriousness of the problem, although sexual harassment cases occur from time to time and cause a great stir at that time, they often end up in the end. The helplessness of the victim and the fluke of the harasser have been around the sexual harassment from beginning to end, which make it become the focus of media attention, but also become a difficult problem of legislation. The basic theoretical research on sexual harassment originated in the United States. The emergence and development of the concept of sexual harassment is closely related to the feminist movement. It can be said that the study of sexual harassment is originated from the feminist movement and feminist jurisprudence. From the point of view that sexual harassment is not only against morality but also actionable at that time, the radical feminist jurists thought that sexual harassment is sexism against women and should end the discrimination and sexual harassment against women in the workplace as soon as possible. However, in the political and economic environment of the time, these studies were basically focused on sexual harassment in the workplace and were discussed in the field of civil and commercial law, which resulted in a very different understanding of the concept of sexual harassment. Therefore, the most important thing in the study of sexual harassment is to find out the concept of sexual harassment, what kind of legal problems have been brought about by the appearance of sexual harassment, and what legal means should be used to solve this problem. From the perspective of feminist jurisprudence, this paper defines the concept of sexual harassment in feminist jurisprudence, analyzes the legal value of sexual harassment, and tries to put forward some legislative suggestions on anti-sexual harassment in China. The specific writing ideas are as follows: the first part combs the concept of sexual harassment in feminist jurisprudence, discusses the concept of sexual harassment in three aspects; the second part elaborates the legal value of sexual harassment in detail, mainly from the perspective of sex, Gender and law, the traditional dual division of the public / private sphere, especially the gender perspective of feminist jurisprudence, are three levels to analyze the nature of sexual harassment. The third part is the theoretical study of sexual harassment. This paper puts forward some suggestions on the legislation of anti-sexual harassment, enumerates some cases of sexual harassment in China, points out the difficulties existing in the legislation of anti-sexual harassment in our country at present, and draws lessons from the legislative practice of feminist jurisprudence on the issue of sexual harassment. Some suggestions on anti-sexual harassment legislation in China are put forward theoretically and practically. Regulating sexual harassment by way of legislation is the realistic choice to deal with more and more sexual harassment cases. To define the concept of sexual harassment and put forward the concept of sexual harassment suitable to the situation of our country, it can also provide more theoretical support for judicial practice while solving the legislative problems.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊立新,張國宏;論構(gòu)建以私權(quán)利保護(hù)為中心的性騷擾法律規(guī)制體系[J];福建師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

2 王雪梅;;社會(huì)性別視角下的性騷擾定義淺析[J];婦女研究論叢;2006年05期

3 李秀華;;從性別視角對性騷擾立法模式的反思[J];婦女研究論叢;2006年S2期

4 耿殿磊;;性騷擾概念的產(chǎn)生和流變——國際視角的分析[J];婦女研究論叢;2010年01期

5 李寶珍;我國性騷擾問題的現(xiàn)狀及其法律思考[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年06期

6 耿殿磊;;美國的性騷擾概念及其發(fā)展[J];河北法學(xué);2010年04期

7 顧敏康;性騷擾的民事責(zé)任初探[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2004年03期

8 莊渝霞;后現(xiàn)代主義與女權(quán)主義的交鋒 試論后現(xiàn)代女權(quán)主義的解構(gòu)[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年07期

9 管斌;工作場所性騷擾的法律思考[J];律師世界;2003年08期

10 楊莉馨;試論西方女權(quán)主義理論走向[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年04期

本文編號：1792384