發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-04 21:40

  本文選題：股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同　切入點(diǎn)：解除權(quán)　出處：《中國法學(xué)》2017年02期

【摘要】：《合同法》第174條并未明確對其他有償合同所參照的買賣合同有關(guān)規(guī)定的范圍,理論界和實(shí)務(wù)部門對股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同是否能直接參照買賣合同相關(guān)規(guī)定都存在爭議。通過對第67號指導(dǎo)案例以及同類股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓案件的分析,可以總結(jié)出該類案件的法律適用規(guī)則:首先,作為特殊標(biāo)的物,股權(quán)的移轉(zhuǎn)和交付方式?jīng)Q定了其轉(zhuǎn)讓合同不應(yīng)當(dāng)適用《合同法》第167條規(guī)定的分期付款解除權(quán);其次,在適用其他法定解除權(quán)時(shí),應(yīng)當(dāng)從商事交易的特殊性角度出發(fā),從嚴(yán)把握解除權(quán)的適用條件。由于商法與民法體系之間的價(jià)值取向各有側(cè)重,商法更偏重效率價(jià)值以及外觀主義而民法更偏重追求當(dāng)事人間的公平正義,導(dǎo)致了同一行為的內(nèi)外部價(jià)值評價(jià)出現(xiàn)矛盾,因此,從行為本身的屬性來判斷異類規(guī)則的適用性和適用程度是更為合理的解決方式。
[Abstract]:Article 174 of the contract Law does not clearly define the scope of the relevant provisions of the contract of sale referred to in other paid contracts, and there is a dispute in the theoretical and practical sectors as to whether the contract of transfer of shares can directly refer to the relevant provisions of the contract of sale and purchase.Through the analysis of the guiding case No. 67 and the case of similar equity transfer, we can conclude the applicable rules of the law of this kind of cases: first, as a special subject matter,The transfer and delivery of equity determines that the transfer contract should not apply the right to release the installment payment as stipulated in Article 167 of the contract Law; secondly, when applying other statutory dissolution rights, it should proceed from the perspective of the particularity of the commercial transaction.Strictly grasp the applicable conditions of the right of rescission.Because the value orientation between commercial law and civil law system has its own emphasis, commercial law pays more attention to efficiency value and appearance doctrine, and civil law pays more attention to the pursuit of fairness and justice between the parties, which leads to the contradiction between internal and external value evaluation of the same behavior.It is more reasonable to judge the applicability and applicability of the rule from the nature of the behavior itself.
【作者單位】： 北京外國語大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D923.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王衛(wèi)民;;淺析股權(quán)交易的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制[J];法制與社會;2010年07期

2 葉錫環(huán);周俊朗;;溫州試水“股權(quán)投資”[J];浙江人大;2010年06期

3 嚴(yán)德軍;王云龍;焦中華;;關(guān)于股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓稅收管理的研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究參考;2011年57期

4 葉開;;股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓風(fēng)險(xiǎn)規(guī)避和制度完善[J];市場周刊(理論研究);2011年12期

5 周友蘇;鄭，

本文編號：1711782