本文選題：商號(hào)　切入點(diǎn)：商標(biāo)　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 從各國(guó)的商法實(shí)踐中,可以看到商號(hào)權(quán)法律制度一直是各國(guó)商事立法中的重頭戲——各國(guó)均把商號(hào)權(quán)的保護(hù)作為本國(guó)商事立法的一個(gè)極其重要的方面。商號(hào)權(quán)的保護(hù)關(guān)乎整個(gè)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)良性循環(huán)地發(fā)展,對(duì)于我國(guó)建立良好的商業(yè)秩序起著不可替代的作用。在當(dāng)代中國(guó),不法侵害人以各種各樣的途徑侵犯商號(hào)權(quán)人對(duì)商號(hào)的使用權(quán),對(duì)原權(quán)利人造成了重大的損害,但中國(guó)相關(guān)法規(guī)缺乏對(duì)商號(hào)侵權(quán)案件的規(guī)制。通過(guò)本論題的研究,一方面可以對(duì)商號(hào)權(quán)諸多糾紛進(jìn)行梳理,另一方面通過(guò)對(duì)中國(guó)與發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家商號(hào)權(quán)立法的比較,找出中國(guó)商號(hào)立法的不足,并針對(duì)這些不足提出自己的一些拙見(jiàn)。 論文從一開(kāi)始就宏觀地介紹了一下中國(guó)在商號(hào)權(quán)立法上的現(xiàn)狀,讓讀者有一個(gè)初步的認(rèn)識(shí)。對(duì)整篇文章起著一個(gè)提攜作用。為了讓文章更易接受,緊接著介紹了商號(hào)權(quán)的基本內(nèi)涵,并詳細(xì)指出了商號(hào)權(quán)與其他近似權(quán)利的區(qū)別,以平緩的方式自然過(guò)度到商號(hào)權(quán)在實(shí)踐及理論上的現(xiàn)狀。對(duì)于商號(hào)權(quán)現(xiàn)狀問(wèn)題,主要是介紹了中外商號(hào)權(quán)立法實(shí)踐及理論上的現(xiàn)狀,這部分基本上涵蓋了世界上大部分國(guó)家的商號(hào)權(quán)立法實(shí)踐情況,對(duì)在宏觀上把握商號(hào)權(quán)保護(hù)的現(xiàn)狀有重要的作用。從商號(hào)權(quán)的現(xiàn)狀中,細(xì)致分析一下就可以發(fā)現(xiàn)中國(guó)商號(hào)權(quán)立法的不足。這種不足是由于多種因素造成的,如商號(hào)立法效力層次不夠,各種商號(hào)權(quán)立法的體系性不足等。集中表現(xiàn)在以下幾個(gè)方面:其一是我國(guó)商事法規(guī)對(duì)于商號(hào)權(quán)的定性不甚明朗;其二是我國(guó)商號(hào)權(quán)立法的位階層次不夠,效力不高。其三是我國(guó)商法對(duì)于商號(hào)權(quán)的保護(hù)的范圍及程度與其他國(guó)家相比,相對(duì)較為狹窄。在找出中國(guó)商事立法缺陷與不足的情況下,本文立足比較法,從中外商事立法在商號(hào)權(quán)保護(hù)的比較中出發(fā),進(jìn)一步闡述中國(guó)商號(hào)權(quán)立法的不足,使得讀者的認(rèn)識(shí)更為深刻。在比較中,我們不難發(fā)現(xiàn),中國(guó)商事立法存在的問(wèn)題是復(fù)雜多樣的。中國(guó)商號(hào)權(quán)立法在選用原則、保護(hù)的范圍、不正當(dāng)使用商號(hào)的形態(tài)以及商號(hào)轉(zhuǎn)讓的債務(wù)承擔(dān)上所暴露出來(lái)的問(wèn)題是中國(guó)商事立法所從未涉及的。要解決商號(hào)權(quán)立法中所存在的問(wèn)題,不得不對(duì)商號(hào)權(quán)進(jìn)行細(xì)致、透徹的分析,從而在本質(zhì)上找出商號(hào)權(quán)與其他權(quán)利所不同之處,這有助于解決中國(guó)商號(hào)權(quán)諸多問(wèn)題。從源頭與本質(zhì)上分析商號(hào)權(quán),是開(kāi)啟中國(guó)商號(hào)權(quán)與諸多權(quán)利糾紛的鑰匙。本文前四個(gè)部分分別從不同角度提出了中國(guó)商號(hào)權(quán)立法的不足,是一種宏觀、抽象的列舉,使我們對(duì)于商號(hào)權(quán)立法的不足有著更加深刻的認(rèn)知。 最后我們針對(duì)前面論述中所提出的問(wèn)題,綜合、系統(tǒng)的提出了多種解決問(wèn)題的方式和方法,如為中國(guó)商號(hào)權(quán)立法建立一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的原則、在中國(guó)的商號(hào)權(quán)立法上明確中國(guó)商號(hào)權(quán)的性質(zhì)、完善統(tǒng)一中國(guó)的商號(hào)權(quán)立法、并建議在以后的中國(guó)商號(hào)權(quán)立法實(shí)踐中盡量吸取外國(guó)商號(hào)權(quán)立法及理論中所獲得的寶貴實(shí)踐,希望為中國(guó)商號(hào)權(quán)的立法實(shí)踐、理論研究和廣大商號(hào)權(quán)人的維權(quán)提供了新的思路和途徑。
[Abstract]:From the practice of commercial law, we can see the legal system of trade name has been the business of major legislation, all countries have the right of trade name protection as a matter of national legislation is extremely important. The protection of trade name rights in relation to the whole market economy to develop a virtuous circle, in order to establish a good business I play irreplaceable role. In modern Chinese, illegal violations of the right to use the right of business firms in a variety of ways, the right to cause significant damage, but China regulations lack of regulation of trade name infringement cases. Through the research of this thesis, one can sort of trade name right a lot of disputes, on the other hand, through the comparison of the right of trade name China with developed countries legislation, find out the Chinese firm legislation, and solve these problems put forward some of his views.
From the beginning to introduce a macro situation in China trade name right legislation, let readers have a preliminary understanding. Plays the role of a carrying of the whole article. In order to make the article more accepted, then introduces the basic connotation of the right of trade name, and pointed out to right and other the approximate right difference, current situation in order to smooth the way over to the firm a natural right in practice and theory. The status quo for the right firms, mainly introduces the current situation of Chinese foreign trade name right legislation practice and theory, this part basically covers most countries in the world trade name right of the legislative practice, have important the role of the situation in the macro name right protection. From the present situation of the right of trade name, the detailed analysis can be found that lack of China name right legislation. This is due to many factors, such as trade legislation. The force level is not enough, a variety of business legislative system is inadequate. Concentrated in the following aspects: one is qualitative for the right of trade name of commercial law in China is not very clear; the second is a right of legislation of our business class is not enough, the effectiveness is not high. The third is the scope of protection of commercial law in China for business the right and extent compared with other countries, the relatively narrow. The defects China commercial legislation and deficiencies, based on the comparison, from the Chinese and foreign commercial legislation in the protection of the right of trade name, further elaborates the lack of China legislative power firm, has a more profound understanding of the reader in the comparison. And it is not difficult to find, there Chinese commercial legislation problems are complex. Chinese trade name right legislation in the selection principle, the scope of protection, the improper use of debt in the form of firm and firm commitment on the transfer The problems exposed are China business has never been involved in legislation. In order to solve the existing legislation of the right of trade name, trade name right to conduct detailed and thorough analysis, which in essence, find the right business rights with other differences, which helps to solve many problems China name right from the right of trade name. The source and nature, is open China firm right and many rights disputes key. This paper first four part puts forward the Chinese firm right legislation from different angles, is a macro, abstract list, so that we have a more profound understanding for the lack of the trade name right legislation.
At last we discussed earlier in the comprehensive questions, put forward a variety of system and the ways to solve the problems, such as the establishment of a unified principle Chinese firm right legislation, clear the nature of the right of trade name in the China China firm right legislation, perfect unity of the right of trade name legislation, and suggests that in after the China trade name right in legislation and practice to learn valuable practice for foreign trade name right legislation and theory, hope for Chinese legislative practice of the right of trade name, and provides a new way for theoretical research and the trade name right of human rights.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D923.43

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 聶凌;論商號(hào)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1661277