本文選題：船舶經(jīng)營人　切入點(diǎn)：船舶登記　出處：《大連海事大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2017年2月頒布實(shí)施的《中華人民共和國船舶登記辦法》(以下簡稱《船舶登記辦法》)取消了我國船舶經(jīng)營人的登記。而船舶經(jīng)營人作為《中華人民共和國海商法》(以下簡稱《海商法》)規(guī)定的重要海事主體之一,在實(shí)踐中依然廣泛存在且因相關(guān)法律規(guī)定模糊容易引發(fā)糾紛。識別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不明確導(dǎo)致實(shí)踐中無法以統(tǒng)一標(biāo)準(zhǔn)識別船舶經(jīng)營人,尤其對于與其從事類似活動(dòng)的主體難以排除,致使海事賠償責(zé)任限制的主體不明確。對此,本文意在通過研究《海商法》下船舶經(jīng)營人登記取消后識別方式的變化、船舶經(jīng)營人含義的理解以及船舶經(jīng)營人的特征,以期明確船舶經(jīng)營人的識別標(biāo)準(zhǔn),適應(yīng)新形勢的變化。最后對于與船舶經(jīng)營人從事類似經(jīng)營活動(dòng)的相關(guān)海事主體進(jìn)行嘗試性分析,探討其是否可以納入船舶經(jīng)營人的范疇,從而享受船舶經(jīng)營人的相關(guān)權(quán)利。引言部分簡要分析了船舶經(jīng)營人的識別在法律規(guī)定與實(shí)踐中的情況,闡述了本文的選題背景、研究任務(wù)以及寫作思路。第一章提出問題,分析了船舶經(jīng)營人在實(shí)踐中的存在情況以及引發(fā)的問題,針對最新出臺的《船舶登記辦法》取消船舶經(jīng)營人登記的情況,分析了當(dāng)前船舶經(jīng)營人登記中存在的問題,最后探討了明確船舶經(jīng)營人識別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的重要性。第二章解釋了船舶經(jīng)營人在《海商法》下的含義,首先界定了本文研究對象的范圍,之后從船舶經(jīng)營人含義在學(xué)術(shù)界及司法實(shí)踐中的現(xiàn)狀入手,總結(jié)界定船舶經(jīng)營人含義的爭議焦點(diǎn)問題;通過對《海商法》中船舶經(jīng)營人的立法意圖的分析確定船舶經(jīng)營人的理解角度;最后分析厘清存在爭議的問題,對我國《海商法》中的船舶經(jīng)營人含義作出本文的解釋。第三章探討了船舶經(jīng)營人的識別依據(jù),首先分析了船舶經(jīng)營人登記取消對于其識別的影響。從船舶經(jīng)營人經(jīng)營權(quán)的來源、經(jīng)營行為的要求以及收入的來源三個(gè)方面入手分析了船舶經(jīng)營人的特征并將其推導(dǎo)為船舶經(jīng)營人識別的主要依據(jù)。最后擬定出適應(yīng)新形勢的船舶經(jīng)營人識別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)并提出船舶委托經(jīng)營合同的改進(jìn)對策。第四章進(jìn)一步對實(shí)際從事船舶經(jīng)營的相關(guān)海事主體包括船舶管理人、無船承運(yùn)人、船舶掛靠人、船舶融資租賃人以及方便旗船經(jīng)營人進(jìn)行辨析,分析其是否可以納入《海商法》所規(guī)定的船舶經(jīng)營人的范疇,承擔(dān)船舶經(jīng)營人的責(zé)任,享受船舶經(jīng)營人的權(quán)利。
[Abstract]:In February 2017, the regulations of the people's Republic of China on ship Registration (hereinafter referred to as "methods of ship Registration") cancelled the registration of Chinese ship operators, and the ship operators as the "Maritime Law of the people's Republic of China" (. "hereinafter referred to as" Maritime Law ") as one of the important maritime subjects, In practice, it still exists widely and it is easy to cause disputes because of the ambiguity of relevant laws and regulations. The identification standard is not clear enough to identify the ship operator with the unified standard in practice, especially for the subjects engaged in similar activities, especially for the subjects who engage in similar activities. The main body of the limitation of liability for maritime claims is not clear. In view of this, this paper intends to study the change of the identification mode after the cancellation of the registration of the ship operator under the Maritime Law, the understanding of the meaning of the ship operator and the characteristics of the ship operator. In order to make clear the identification standard of ship operator and adapt to the change of new situation, this paper makes a tentative analysis on the relevant maritime subject engaged in similar business activities with ship operator, and discusses whether it can be brought into the category of ship operator. The introduction briefly analyzes the identification of ship operators in the legal provisions and practice, expounds the background of this topic, research tasks and writing ideas. The first chapter puts forward questions. This paper analyzes the existing situation of ship operator in practice and the problems caused by it. In view of the situation of canceling the registration of ship operator, the problems existing in the registration of ship operator are analyzed. Finally, it discusses the importance of identifying the ship operator. Chapter two explains the meaning of the ship operator under the Maritime Law, and defines the scope of the research object. Then, from the current situation of the meaning of ship operator in the academic and judicial practice, the paper summarizes the controversial focus of defining the meaning of ship operator; Through the analysis of the legislative intention of the ship operator in the Maritime Law, the author determines the understanding angle of the ship operator, and finally analyzes and clarifies the controversial issues, The meaning of ship operator in Maritime Law of China is explained in this paper. Chapter three discusses the identification basis of ship operator. Firstly, this paper analyzes the influence of the cancellation of ship operator's registration on its identification. This paper analyzes the characteristics of ship operators and deduces them as the main basis for the identification of ship operators. Finally, the identification criteria for ship operators adapted to the new situation are worked out. In Chapter 4th, the relevant maritime subjects engaged in ship management, including the ship manager, are further discussed in Chapter 4th. The non-ship carrier, the ship operator, the vessel financing charterer and the convenience flag vessel operator shall be differentiated and analyzed, and whether they can be brought into the scope of the ship operator stipulated in the Maritime Law, and bear the responsibility of the ship operator, Enjoy the rights of the ship's operator.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高專;;船舶經(jīng)營人的國際化傾向[J];航海科技動(dòng)態(tài);1996年03期

2 武寒霜;;船舶物料和備品供應(yīng)合同糾紛案——DLSS貿(mào)易有限公司訴LYKK船務(wù)有限公司、LH船舶物料和備品供應(yīng)合同糾紛案[J];世界海運(yùn);2014年01期

3 張麗敏;;船舶經(jīng)營人與船舶管理人之辨析[J];廣東交通職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

4 張運(yùn)鑫;;論海商法中船舶經(jīng)營人的概念[J];珠江水運(yùn);2008年01期

5 ;ISM Code簡介[J];水路運(yùn)輸文摘;2001年02期

6 周靜;;船舶經(jīng)營人在船舶碰撞中的法律地位[J];珠江水運(yùn);2007年03期

7 曲濤;;論船舶經(jīng)營人在船舶碰撞中的責(zé)任主體地位[J];中國海商法年刊;2008年00期

8 何麗新;錢小敏;;“船舶經(jīng)營人”的識別——兼評《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理海事賠償責(zé)任限制相關(guān)糾紛案件的若干規(guī)定》第12條[J];中國海商法年刊;2011年01期

9 ;中華人民共和國海上海事行政處罰規(guī)定[J];中國海商法年刊;2003年00期

10 張姍姍;保險(xiǎn)人賠付的正當(dāng)性及船舶經(jīng)營人之貸損責(zé)任承擔(dān)[J];中國船檢;2005年04期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 翁齊斌;;海事責(zé)任承擔(dān)與海上保險(xiǎn)合同效力研究[A];中國律師2005年海商法研討會論文集[C];2005年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 朱婧;希望可以看到有中國的組織加入[N];中國水運(yùn)報(bào);2007年

2 張洪瑞;綿陽建立淘汰機(jī)制[N];中國水運(yùn)報(bào);2007年

3 上海海事法院 季剛;追問船舶經(jīng)營人損害賠償?shù)呢?zé)任[N];國際商報(bào);2011年

4 王守仁;燃油漲價(jià) 在航運(yùn)業(yè)的口袋燒了個(gè)洞[N];中國水運(yùn)報(bào);2006年

5 李宏;FMC向中國、日本施壓[N];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)消息;2002年

6 向遠(yuǎn);打造一流船舶經(jīng)營人[N];中國遠(yuǎn)洋報(bào);2007年

7 楊成兵 蔣靜;四川洪射三船主受重罰[N];中國安全生產(chǎn)報(bào);2005年

8 楊光;國際石油海運(yùn)論壇首次造訪中國[N];中國交通報(bào);2007年

9 通訊員鐘臨軍;浙江規(guī)范運(yùn)輸船舶委托經(jīng)營管理行為[N];中國水運(yùn)報(bào);2003年

10 宋偉　記者 張?zhí)m;我市明確客渡運(yùn)輸相關(guān)補(bǔ)助規(guī)定[N];瀘州日報(bào);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張馨;船舶經(jīng)營人在我國《海商法》下的識別問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2017年

2 耿新穎;船舶經(jīng)營人的識別及其法律地位[D];大連海事大學(xué);2006年

3 楊安山;“船舶經(jīng)營人”研究[D];上海海事大學(xué);2006年

4 趙偉;船舶經(jīng)營人的識別及相關(guān)法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2003年

，

本文編號：1641959