瓊瑤訴于正案之評(píng)析
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-07-31 12:48
【摘要】：瓊瑤訴于正案爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)主要集中于三個(gè)方面:一是被告是否構(gòu)成侵權(quán);二是判賠數(shù)額是否合理;三是是否應(yīng)該判處被告停止侵權(quán)。是否構(gòu)成實(shí)質(zhì)性相似是判斷構(gòu)成著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),不僅要使情節(jié)脫離整體結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行比較,而且要從宏觀和微觀進(jìn)行綜合比較。本案在基于侵權(quán)者非法所得的條件下,判賠金額偏少。對(duì)于既是侵權(quán)作品,又具有獨(dú)創(chuàng)性的演繹作品來(lái)說(shuō),判處"禁播"的處罰過(guò)重。
[Abstract]:Qiongyao's complaint is mainly focused on three aspects:first, whether the defendant constitutes an infringement;Second, whether the amount of claim is reasonable;The third is whether the defendant should be sentenced to stop the infringement. Whether or not to constitute the substantive similarity is the criterion of determining the infringement of copyright, not only to make the plot separate from the overall structure for comparison, but also from macroscopic and micro comparison. In this case, under the condition of illegal income from the infringer, the amount of claim is less. For both infringing and original work, the punishment of``No Broadcast'' is too heavy.
【作者單位】： 江蘇師范大學(xué);
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41
，
本文編號(hào)：2521334
[Abstract]:Qiongyao's complaint is mainly focused on three aspects:first, whether the defendant constitutes an infringement;Second, whether the amount of claim is reasonable;The third is whether the defendant should be sentenced to stop the infringement. Whether or not to constitute the substantive similarity is the criterion of determining the infringement of copyright, not only to make the plot separate from the overall structure for comparison, but also from macroscopic and micro comparison. In this case, under the condition of illegal income from the infringer, the amount of claim is less. For both infringing and original work, the punishment of``No Broadcast'' is too heavy.
【作者單位】： 江蘇師范大學(xué);
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41
，
本文編號(hào)：2521334
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2521334.html
最近更新
教材專著
