解讀與重構(gòu):《物權(quán)法》第五十三條中的國家機(jī)關(guān)財(cái)產(chǎn)使用權(quán)
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-05 22:27
【摘要】：在我國,國有財(cái)產(chǎn)屬于全民所有,國有財(cái)產(chǎn)的使用直接關(guān)系著國家利益和人民福祉。國家機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)擔(dān)著重要的社會管理和公共服務(wù)職能,客觀上需要大量的國有財(cái)產(chǎn)作為其職能履行的物質(zhì)手段。我國《物權(quán)法》在第五章規(guī)定了國有財(cái)產(chǎn)的歸屬和使用問題,在第五十三條明確規(guī)定了國家機(jī)關(guān)對國有財(cái)產(chǎn)的使用權(quán)。但是,遺憾的是法條并沒有明確國家機(jī)關(guān)財(cái)產(chǎn)使用權(quán)的性質(zhì)和類型,未能實(shí)現(xiàn)該權(quán)利的有名化和明確化,導(dǎo)致了國家機(jī)關(guān)對國有財(cái)產(chǎn)使用的混亂狀況和司法實(shí)踐上的困惑未能全部解決。筆者通過分析國家機(jī)關(guān)使用的國有財(cái)產(chǎn)的性質(zhì)并考察國外國對家機(jī)關(guān)國有財(cái)產(chǎn)使用的立法例,認(rèn)為俄羅斯法上的業(yè)務(wù)管理權(quán)以其獨(dú)特的法權(quán)構(gòu)造在國有財(cái)產(chǎn)利用方面有著較大的優(yōu)勢,值得我國借鑒。并通過對俄羅斯法上業(yè)務(wù)管理權(quán)的產(chǎn)生背景、權(quán)利性質(zhì)、權(quán)利客體、權(quán)利特征、適用主體等多個(gè)方面進(jìn)行分析研究,建議在其基礎(chǔ)上以業(yè)務(wù)管理權(quán)對我國《物權(quán)法》中的國家機(jī)關(guān)使用權(quán)進(jìn)行重構(gòu),以此實(shí)現(xiàn)我國國家機(jī)關(guān)財(cái)產(chǎn)使用權(quán)的有名化和權(quán)能結(jié)構(gòu)的完善。本文除了引言、致謝外,正文共有七個(gè)部分。第一部分為國家機(jī)關(guān)財(cái)產(chǎn)使用權(quán)客體的范圍及特征,通過研究羅馬法、法國法、德國法、日本法、俄羅斯法和我國臺灣地區(qū)法律中有關(guān)國有財(cái)產(chǎn)使用的立法例進(jìn)一步明晰國家機(jī)關(guān)國有財(cái)產(chǎn)使用權(quán)的客體范圍與特征;第二部分是對國家機(jī)關(guān)財(cái)產(chǎn)使用權(quán)性質(zhì)的剖析,主要介紹了關(guān)于國家機(jī)關(guān)財(cái)產(chǎn)使用權(quán)性質(zhì)的公權(quán)利說、私權(quán)利說與綜合說;第三部分是對我國《物權(quán)法》第五十三條中國家機(jī)關(guān)財(cái)產(chǎn)使用權(quán)的解讀與反思,指出我國《物權(quán)法》中國家機(jī)關(guān)財(cái)產(chǎn)使用權(quán)存在的問題及原因;第四部分是對俄羅斯法上業(yè)務(wù)管理權(quán)制度的介紹,從權(quán)利的產(chǎn)生背景、適用主體、特點(diǎn)和內(nèi)容等多個(gè)角度出發(fā)對這一權(quán)利架構(gòu)進(jìn)行全面認(rèn)識;第五部分為在我國《物權(quán)法》中構(gòu)建業(yè)務(wù)管理權(quán)制度的路徑探討,主要從在我國《物權(quán)法》中建構(gòu)業(yè)務(wù)管理權(quán)的必要性與可能性兩個(gè)方面出發(fā)進(jìn)行論證;第六部分為我國《物權(quán)法》中國家機(jī)關(guān)業(yè)務(wù)管理權(quán)制度的本土化建構(gòu)問題,即結(jié)合我國實(shí)際從概念、權(quán)利性質(zhì)、權(quán)利客體、權(quán)利主體、權(quán)利內(nèi)容方面構(gòu)建適合我國的業(yè)務(wù)管理權(quán);第七部分為結(jié)語部分,在肯定《物權(quán)法》中業(yè)務(wù)管理權(quán)制度對國有財(cái)產(chǎn)使用將產(chǎn)生有益作用的前提下,提出在將來?xiàng)l件成熟時(shí)建立對國有財(cái)產(chǎn)利用統(tǒng)一管理的國有財(cái)產(chǎn)法的構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:In our country, the state-owned property belongs to the whole people, and the use of state-owned property is directly related to the national interests and the well-being of the people. State organs bear important social management and public service functions, and objectively need a large number of state-owned property as the material means for the performance of their functions. The fifth chapter of the property Law of our country stipulates the ownership and use of state-owned property, and Article 53 clearly stipulates the right to use state-owned property by state organs. Unfortunately, however, the law does not clarify the nature and type of property use rights of state organs, and fails to realize the naming and clarity of this right, As a result, the confusion of the use of state-owned property by state organs and the confusion in judicial practice have not been completely solved. By analyzing the nature of state-owned property used by state organs and investigating the legislative examples of the use of state-owned property by state-owned organs in foreign countries, It is considered that the business management right in Russian law has great advantages in the utilization of state-owned property because of its unique legal right structure, which is worth drawing lessons from in our country. And through the Russian law business management power generation background, the right nature, the right object, the right characteristic, the applicable subject and so on many aspects carries on the analysis and research, On the basis of it, it is suggested that the right to use the state organs in the property Law of our country should be reconstructed with the right of business management, so as to realize the nominalization of the right to the use of the property of the state organs in our country and the perfection of the structure of the right to use the property. In addition to the introduction and thanks, there are seven parts of the text. The first part is the scope and characteristics of the object of the right to use property of state organs, through the study of Roman law, French law, German law, Japanese law, The legislative examples of the use of state-owned property in Russian law and the law of Taiwan in China further clarify the scope and characteristics of the object of the right to use state-owned property in state organs. The second part is the analysis of the nature of the right to use the property of state organs, mainly introduces the theory of public rights, the theory of private rights and the comprehensive theory of the nature of the right to use property of state organs. The third part is the interpretation and reflection of Article 53 of the property Law of China, and points out the problems and causes of the right to use the property of Chinese household organs in the property Law of our country. The fourth part is the introduction of the business management power system in Russian law, from the background of the emergence of rights, applicable subjects, characteristics and content and other angles to carry out a comprehensive understanding of this right structure; The fifth part is to discuss the path of constructing the business management right system in the property Law of our country, mainly from two aspects: the necessity and the possibility of constructing the business management right in the property Law of our country. The sixth part is the localization construction of the business management power system of Chinese household organs in the property Law of our country, that is, according to the reality of our country, the concept, the nature of the right, the object of the right, the subject of the right, In terms of the content of rights, the construction of business management power suitable for our country; The seventh part is the conclusion part, on the premise that the business management power system in the property Law will have a beneficial effect on the use of state-owned property, This paper puts forward the idea of establishing a state-owned property law for the unified management of the utilization and management of state-owned property when the conditions are ripe in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.2
本文編號：2493866
[Abstract]:In our country, the state-owned property belongs to the whole people, and the use of state-owned property is directly related to the national interests and the well-being of the people. State organs bear important social management and public service functions, and objectively need a large number of state-owned property as the material means for the performance of their functions. The fifth chapter of the property Law of our country stipulates the ownership and use of state-owned property, and Article 53 clearly stipulates the right to use state-owned property by state organs. Unfortunately, however, the law does not clarify the nature and type of property use rights of state organs, and fails to realize the naming and clarity of this right, As a result, the confusion of the use of state-owned property by state organs and the confusion in judicial practice have not been completely solved. By analyzing the nature of state-owned property used by state organs and investigating the legislative examples of the use of state-owned property by state-owned organs in foreign countries, It is considered that the business management right in Russian law has great advantages in the utilization of state-owned property because of its unique legal right structure, which is worth drawing lessons from in our country. And through the Russian law business management power generation background, the right nature, the right object, the right characteristic, the applicable subject and so on many aspects carries on the analysis and research, On the basis of it, it is suggested that the right to use the state organs in the property Law of our country should be reconstructed with the right of business management, so as to realize the nominalization of the right to the use of the property of the state organs in our country and the perfection of the structure of the right to use the property. In addition to the introduction and thanks, there are seven parts of the text. The first part is the scope and characteristics of the object of the right to use property of state organs, through the study of Roman law, French law, German law, Japanese law, The legislative examples of the use of state-owned property in Russian law and the law of Taiwan in China further clarify the scope and characteristics of the object of the right to use state-owned property in state organs. The second part is the analysis of the nature of the right to use the property of state organs, mainly introduces the theory of public rights, the theory of private rights and the comprehensive theory of the nature of the right to use property of state organs. The third part is the interpretation and reflection of Article 53 of the property Law of China, and points out the problems and causes of the right to use the property of Chinese household organs in the property Law of our country. The fourth part is the introduction of the business management power system in Russian law, from the background of the emergence of rights, applicable subjects, characteristics and content and other angles to carry out a comprehensive understanding of this right structure; The fifth part is to discuss the path of constructing the business management right system in the property Law of our country, mainly from two aspects: the necessity and the possibility of constructing the business management right in the property Law of our country. The sixth part is the localization construction of the business management power system of Chinese household organs in the property Law of our country, that is, according to the reality of our country, the concept, the nature of the right, the object of the right, the subject of the right, In terms of the content of rights, the construction of business management power suitable for our country; The seventh part is the conclusion part, on the premise that the business management power system in the property Law will have a beneficial effect on the use of state-owned property, This paper puts forward the idea of establishing a state-owned property law for the unified management of the utilization and management of state-owned property when the conditions are ripe in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王鍇;;德國法的經(jīng)驗(yàn)對完善我國公共財(cái)產(chǎn)制度的啟示[J];行政與法;2012年03期
2 鄭顯華;;物權(quán)法催生國有財(cái)產(chǎn)分類管理體制的建立——兼論法人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的性質(zhì)[J];前沿;2011年20期
3 張建文;;作為法主體之國家:理論、實(shí)踐與批判——以國家的民事主體地位為中心[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)法論叢;2010年02期
4 劉藝;;公物法中的物、財(cái)產(chǎn)、產(chǎn)權(quán)——從德法公物法之客體差異談起[J];浙江學(xué)刊;2010年02期
5 肖澤晟;;中國公物立法初探[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2010年01期
6 張建文;;俄羅斯法上公共機(jī)構(gòu)的財(cái)產(chǎn)責(zé)任問題[J];武漢科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2009年06期
7 張力;;論國家所有權(quán)理論與實(shí)踐的當(dāng)代出路——基于公產(chǎn)與私產(chǎn)的區(qū)分[J];浙江社會科學(xué);2009年12期
8 張建文;;《物權(quán)法》視角下高校法人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的反思與重構(gòu)[J];政法學(xué)刊;2009年02期
9 張力;;社會轉(zhuǎn)型期俄羅斯的公共所有權(quán)制度——兼論公共所有權(quán)與私人所有權(quán)的制度關(guān)系[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年02期
10 譚啟平;朱濤;;論物權(quán)主體[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 呂瑞云;公法法人財(cái)產(chǎn)所有權(quán)問題研究[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2011年
，本文編號：2493866
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2493866.html
最近更新
教材專著
