【摘要】：在道路上自由通行,在公園、景區(qū)、海灘游玩嬉戲,在城市的綠化中享受清新的空氣和愉悅的感官體驗(yàn),這些都是與人們?nèi)粘Ｉ蠲芮邢嚓P(guān)的公眾用財(cái)產(chǎn)的一般利用情形。當(dāng)人口稀少,資源充足時(shí),個(gè)人能夠以一種自給自足、相對(duì)獨(dú)立的生活方式充分的享受到公眾用財(cái)產(chǎn)帶來的福利。但隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的發(fā)展,人口激增,資源匱乏,個(gè)人的社會(huì)依賴性日漸突顯,這種生活方式的轉(zhuǎn)變,不僅使得公眾用財(cái)產(chǎn)的供給顯得緊張,也使管理者對(duì)公眾用財(cái)產(chǎn)的管理變得捉襟見肘。資源的緊張,管理的不足,導(dǎo)致了不同主體之間的利益無法得到均衡的保護(hù),而制度的匱乏,則進(jìn)一步加深了利益的沖突。如何在“物盡其用”的理念下,追求公眾用財(cái)產(chǎn)公用效益的最大化,確保國家對(duì)公民生存照顧責(zé)任的實(shí)現(xiàn)?如何在既有的法律背景下調(diào)和矛盾、化解糾紛,保障公眾的對(duì)公眾用財(cái)產(chǎn)進(jìn)行一般利用的合法權(quán)益?基于以上問題,本文將以轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期《物權(quán)法》的二元性為視角,對(duì)國有財(cái)產(chǎn)中的公眾用財(cái)產(chǎn)的一般利用問題進(jìn)行民法緯度的思考,以期對(duì)國有財(cái)產(chǎn)利用保障機(jī)制的建構(gòu)提供少許思路。除引言和結(jié)語外,本文主要包含四部分內(nèi)容。第一部分,以公眾用財(cái)產(chǎn)的定位和一般利用的界定為切入點(diǎn),探尋公眾用財(cái)產(chǎn)一般利用的基本價(jià)值,奠定行文的理論基礎(chǔ)。第二部分,對(duì)域外公物一般利用制度相關(guān)的理論和學(xué)說進(jìn)行梳理、分析,以期對(duì)一般利用制度有更加深入和系統(tǒng)的認(rèn)識(shí),進(jìn)而為我國公眾用財(cái)產(chǎn)一般利用制度的構(gòu)建提供有益的借鑒。第三部分,從幾個(gè)較為典型案件的分析出發(fā),對(duì)一般利用問題在我國的司法實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行梳理,對(duì)一般利用糾紛中的主要問題進(jìn)行總結(jié),并探尋造成這些問題的原因。第四部分,結(jié)合前三部分的分析研究,對(duì)公眾用財(cái)產(chǎn)一般利用制度的構(gòu)建進(jìn)行了民法緯度的思考和研究,嘗試明晰一般利用財(cái)產(chǎn)性人格權(quán)的法律地位,理清一般利用中具體的權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:Free passage on the road, play in parks, scenic spots, beaches, enjoy fresh air and pleasant sensory experience in the greening of the city, these are the general use of public property closely related to people's daily life. When the population is scarce and the resources are sufficient, individuals can fully enjoy the benefits of public property in a self-sufficient and relatively independent way of life. However, with the development of economy and society, the population is surging, the resources are scarce and the social dependence of individuals is becoming more and more prominent. The change of life style not only makes the supply of public property tight. It also makes the management of public property stretched by managers. Due to the shortage of resources and management, the interests of different subjects can not be protected in a balanced manner, while the lack of system further deepens the conflict of interests. Under the concept of "making the best use of things", how to pursue the maximization of the public benefit of public property, and to ensure the realization of the responsibility of the state to take care of the survival of citizens? How to reconcile contradictions under the existing legal background, resolve disputes, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the public in the general use of property? Based on the above problems, this paper will think about the general use of public property in state-owned property from the perspective of the duality of property Law in the transitional period. In order to provide some ideas for the construction of state-owned property utilization guarantee mechanism. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper mainly consists of four parts. The first part, taking the orientation of public property and the definition of general use as the starting point, explores the basic value of the general use of public property, and lays the theoretical foundation of the text. The second part combs and analyzes the theories and theories related to the general utilization system of foreign public property, in order to have a deeper and systematic understanding of the general utilization system. Then it provides a useful reference for the construction of the general utilization system of public property in our country. The third part, starting from the analysis of several typical cases, combs the present situation of the judicial practice of the general utilization problem in our country, summarizes the main problems in the general utilization dispute, and explores the causes of these problems. The fourth part, combined with the analysis and research of the first three parts, thinks and studies the construction of the general utilization system of public property in civil law, and tries to clarify the legal status of the general use of property personality right. Clarify the specific relationship between rights and obligations in general use.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李國際;田強(qiáng);;知情權(quán)的權(quán)利屬性及其憲法保護(hù)[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年03期

2 李孟春;;知情權(quán)的憲法權(quán)利屬性及其實(shí)現(xiàn)——“政府信息公開第一案”引發(fā)的憲法學(xué)思考[J];中共樂山市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

3 林愛s，

本文編號(hào)：2489827