發(fā)布時間：2019-05-19 13:13

【摘要】：我國技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度實務(wù)運作還存在許多爭議問題,尚存在人數(shù)過少、程序地位不清、可能導(dǎo)致專利訴訟的主導(dǎo)權(quán)發(fā)生偏向、可能與當(dāng)事人主義產(chǎn)生矛盾等不足。其理想的運作模式在于法官、技術(shù)調(diào)查官、當(dāng)事人及訴訟代理人間的良好合作互動。其改革與精進需調(diào)整選任方式以擴大技術(shù)調(diào)查官來源、合理設(shè)置技術(shù)調(diào)查官的輪調(diào)年限、增加法庭上技術(shù)調(diào)查官人數(shù)、促進技術(shù)調(diào)查官與專利代理人的專業(yè)雙向交流�？陀^制度上需給予技術(shù)調(diào)查官妥善的限制,避免其成為影子法官�；谠V訟當(dāng)事人的程序權(quán)保障,應(yīng)強制技術(shù)調(diào)查官對當(dāng)事人發(fā)問,促進雙方充分言詞辯論,同時還應(yīng)強制法官公開心證,避免突襲性裁判的發(fā)生。
[Abstract]:There are still many controversial problems in the practical operation of the technical investigators system in our country, there are still too few people and unclear procedural status, which may lead to the bias of the leading power of patent litigation, and may contradict the litigant doctrine and so on. Its ideal mode of operation lies in the good cooperation and interaction among judges, technical investigators, parties and litigants. The reform and refinement need to adjust the mode of selection and appointment in order to expand the source of technical investigators, reasonably set up the rotation life of technical investigators, increase the number of technical investigators in court, and promote the professional two-way communication between technical investigators and patent agents. In the objective system, technical investigators should be given proper restrictions to avoid becoming shadow judges. Based on the protection of the procedural rights of the litigants, the technical investigators should be forced to question the litigants and promote the full debate between the two sides. At the same time, the judges should be forced to disclose their evidence to avoid the occurrence of raging decisions.
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學(xué);
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金項目“合作主義視野中城鎮(zhèn)基層糾紛解決實證研究”(13XFX015) 2015年重慶市研究生科研創(chuàng)新項目“民事裁判中的司法控制與結(jié)果導(dǎo)向方法研究”(YKC201501083) 重慶市研究生科研創(chuàng)新項目“技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度的實務(wù)運作與再精進”(CYS16105)
【分類號】：D923.4

【相似文獻】

中國碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前4條

1 黃琨;論我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判中技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度的再造[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2016年

2 賀偉;專利訴訟中技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2016年

3 竇川;中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度研究[D];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué);2016年

4 蔣竹婷;關(guān)于我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法院技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度思考[D];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號：2480755