【摘要】：作為民事私力救濟方式之一的自助行為在現(xiàn)實社會中大量存在,它在權(quán)利的實現(xiàn)與保護過程中發(fā)揮了積極的作用,它本身帶有的合理性也日益受到人們的認可。但是,由于現(xiàn)行民事立法沒有正面規(guī)范自助行為制度,使得客觀存在的自助行為常常因為缺乏法律必要的規(guī)制,而被認定為違法行為。如何通過規(guī)則設計發(fā)揮自助行為的積極作用,劃清其與違法行為的界限,對司法實踐有著重要意義。本文通過對自助行為的概念、性質(zhì)及構(gòu)成要件等諸要素進行分析論證,希望能對如何界定自助行為認定標準及對正在制定的民法典草案有所裨益。筆者認為,自助行為在民事權(quán)利的實現(xiàn)和保護過程中正在發(fā)揮著不可替代的作用,應該把它作為民事權(quán)利保障和實現(xiàn)體系的重要組成部分來加以完善,不僅有利于明確對司法實踐中此類問題的認定和裁判標準,劃清與侵權(quán)的界限,而且對完善民法體系權(quán)利救濟體系也是有積極意義的。在文章的結(jié)構(gòu)體系編排上,作者首先分析了國內(nèi)外學者對自助行為的有關(guān)理論研究和有關(guān)自助行為的立法實踐,緊接著又指明了我國有關(guān)自助行為的理論認識和實踐發(fā)展,并對兩者進行比較,然后以民法的本質(zhì)及法理價值為基礎,圍繞自助行為的概念界定、制度的必要性及自助行為應遵循的基本原則、構(gòu)成要件、類型化設計、行為限度,配套制度建設等方面展開論述,最后在前文論述基礎上對于在我國民事立法上設立自助行為規(guī)則進行了探討,希望通過類型化,能為實踐中的自助行為界定明確的判斷標準,劃清其與不當自助行為的界限,促進自助行為的法制化和體系化,從而在總體上促進我國民事私力救濟體系的發(fā)展和完善。
[Abstract]:As one of the ways of civil private relief, self-help behavior exists in a large number of real society, it has played a positive role in the realization and protection of rights, and its own rationality has been increasingly recognized by people. However, because the current civil legislation does not positively regulate the self-help behavior system, the objective existence of self-help behavior is often recognized as illegal because of the lack of necessary legal regulation. How to give full play to the positive role of self-help behavior through the design of rules and make clear the boundary between self-help behavior and illegal act is of great significance to judicial practice. Based on the analysis and demonstration of the concept, nature and constituent elements of self-help behavior, this paper hopes to be beneficial to how to define the identification standard of self-help behavior and to the draft civil code being formulated. The author believes that self-help behavior is playing an irreplaceable role in the realization and protection of civil rights, and it should be improved as an important part of the protection and realization system of civil rights. It is not only helpful to clarify the identification and adjudication standards of this kind of problems in judicial practice, and to draw the boundary between infringement and infringement, but also has positive significance to perfect the right relief system of civil law system. In the arrangement of the structure and system of the article, the author first analyzes the relevant theoretical research on self-help behavior and the legislative practice of self-help behavior by scholars at home and abroad, and then points out the theoretical understanding and practical development of self-help behavior in our country. And compare the two, and then on the basis of the nature and legal value of civil law, around the concept of self-help behavior definition, the necessity of the system and the basic principles that should be followed by self-help behavior, constituent elements, typed design, behavior limits, This paper discusses the construction of supporting system and so on. Finally, on the basis of the previous discussion, this paper probes into the establishment of self-help behavior rules in the civil legislation of our country, hoping that through typology, it can define the clear judgment standard of self-help behavior in practice. Draw the boundary between it and improper self-help behavior, promote the legalization and systematization of self-help behavior, so as to promote the development and perfection of civil private relief system in our country as a whole.
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 蘇賀新;;論民法上的自助行為[J];黑河學刊;2008年03期

，

本文編號：2475217